Corporations Control and Conversations

Public Market Some new friends and I talked yesterday about their company’s needs with regards to new media and community building. The two people tasked with the roles of bringing podcasting and community to the organization were both smart, had many of the right ideas, and were already marching down a reasonable path. What I felt after our conversation, however, was that their organization wasn’t really convinced that they should make the move fully into this new relationship economy. Here were their sticking points.

Control

It’s hard for a big organization to understand that information isn’t meant to be horded. In fact, control overall is a hallmark of a big old company worrying about their future, but not ready to let go of the wheel a little bit to get there. For those seeking to convince a company to let go, small bites is what I recommend. Find some smaller segment of the whole that they can use as a test bed, and then see what the benefits are. Another point: make sure all sides have benefits. Companies aren’t in business to give the store away.

Conversations

My new friends told me about the challenge of their organization wanting to participate in conversations around their products, but then being sensitive to criticisms. In all cases, the conversation abruptly stopped. Both friends knew that this meant the conversation continued elsewhere, only now out of sight of the company, and without a strong tie back to the people who created the products.

This is a difficult experience. Opening one’s self up for criticism is hard. And there are all kinds of ways that a big organization can be targeted unfairly. Someone from an opposing organization or with a clear benefit to criticizing the company can come on and make trouble. There are lots of reasons people can come on and poison the talk. And yet, other companies have survived and thrived with open conversation mechanisms in place.

Again, seek the upside for all parties. In this case, sometimes the criticisms are real, and deserve consideration for your products. Other times, they’re meant to be harmful. Choose to discredit these, and reinforce your organization’s method.

Navigating the New Relationship Economy

It’s funny how much of these conversations are devoted to technology. These new digital relationship tools do take a little understanding, and knowing when to use which becomes important as well. I found that these two knew what they wanted to accomplish and had selected great tools, but that they could probably use a little more support from the main technology group at the organization. Their projects worked great on the smaller scale, and then there would have to be a larger agreement before creating a project to scale them out to the whole organization.

Also surprising was hearing that companies still have the same debates about blogs (whether or not to do them, internal or external, who gets access). Didn’t we determine this years ago? Evidently not.

What About YOUR Organization?

If you wanted to provide advice to a big company seeking to move into this Relationship Economy world of ours, what would you tell them about social media, social networking, and the ways we choose to enhance our digital life?

And if you’re enjoying this blog, please consider subscribing for free.

Related posts:

  1. You Control People’s Perceptions
  2. Podcast- Digital Conversations
  3. Conversations not Searches – Google vs. Technorati

ChrisBrogan.com runs on the Genesis Framework

Genesis Theme Framework

The Genesis Framework empowers you to quickly and easily build incredible websites with WordPress. Whether you're a novice or advanced developer, Genesis provides you with the secure and search-engine-optimized foundation that takes WordPress to places you never thought it could go.

With automatic theme updates and world-class support included, Genesis is the smart choice for your WordPress website or blog.

Become a StudioPress Affiliate

  • http://www.relationship-economy.com Jay Deragob

    We are entering into a subject matter that is wide and deep. In our initial research we found little reference to a Relationship Matrix in context to the emergence of a networked world other than references to the movie the matrix.

    As such this subject matter covers a series of analysis in context to the emergence of the relationship economy. The new economy is being facilitated by convergence of technological mediums aimed at enabling transactions of economic value through relationships.

    First the definition of “Relationship” defined as connection or association; the condition of being related. Second the definition of “Matrix” defined as something within or from which something else originates, develops, or takes form. And third the definition of “Factors” defined as elements which actively contribute to the production of a result.

    The relationship matrix is used to determine one relationship factor to another and the subsequent value proposition aimed at producing a result. Desired results are defined by the individuals, institutions, organizations and governments within the matrix. Results can also be defined by the interaction of all relationships collectively.Our initial analysis identified the initial set of factors currently influencing the emergence of the relationship economy. Taken within a matrix the combined factors illustrate the potential of over 400 possible interactions which both define and impact end results.

    Using the Matrix

    The purpose of the matrix is to provide a basis for market segments of the relationship economy to define which factors provide the most influence to achievement of an end result. Using other management tools such as a prioritization matrix, affinity diagramming and systemic mapping, the organization of factors can be aligned strategically. Using these tools, the alignment of relationships and efforts to maximize opportunities can be done with clarity of purpose and in context to achievement of specific goals. The dynamics of the current “networking space” is filled with reactionary responses to the stimulus of opportunity fueled by both the hype and adoption of users to the new medium.

    These dynamics are creating a wave of change yet to be defined but speculated as significant and disruptive to say the least.In the coming era, doing the exactly right next thing is far more fruitful than doing the same thing twice. Today’s market of networks appears to be “copying” what others are doing with few leaping ahead with innovative models that enhance multiple factors and improve results for specific or all stakeholders.

    The most influential factor for success is leveraging multiple factors within the matrix and doing so expediently. More details on this subject in the near future.

    What say you?

    to see the matrix illustration visit http://www.relationship-economy.com

  • http://www.relationship-economy.com Jay Deragob

    We are entering into a subject matter that is wide and deep. In our initial research we found little reference to a Relationship Matrix in context to the emergence of a networked world other than references to the movie the matrix.

    As such this subject matter covers a series of analysis in context to the emergence of the relationship economy. The new economy is being facilitated by convergence of technological mediums aimed at enabling transactions of economic value through relationships.

    First the definition of “Relationship” defined as connection or association; the condition of being related. Second the definition of “Matrix” defined as something within or from which something else originates, develops, or takes form. And third the definition of “Factors” defined as elements which actively contribute to the production of a result.

    The relationship matrix is used to determine one relationship factor to another and the subsequent value proposition aimed at producing a result. Desired results are defined by the individuals, institutions, organizations and governments within the matrix. Results can also be defined by the interaction of all relationships collectively.Our initial analysis identified the initial set of factors currently influencing the emergence of the relationship economy. Taken within a matrix the combined factors illustrate the potential of over 400 possible interactions which both define and impact end results.

    Using the Matrix

    The purpose of the matrix is to provide a basis for market segments of the relationship economy to define which factors provide the most influence to achievement of an end result. Using other management tools such as a prioritization matrix, affinity diagramming and systemic mapping, the organization of factors can be aligned strategically. Using these tools, the alignment of relationships and efforts to maximize opportunities can be done with clarity of purpose and in context to achievement of specific goals. The dynamics of the current “networking space” is filled with reactionary responses to the stimulus of opportunity fueled by both the hype and adoption of users to the new medium.

    These dynamics are creating a wave of change yet to be defined but speculated as significant and disruptive to say the least.In the coming era, doing the exactly right next thing is far more fruitful than doing the same thing twice. Today’s market of networks appears to be “copying” what others are doing with few leaping ahead with innovative models that enhance multiple factors and improve results for specific or all stakeholders.

    The most influential factor for success is leveraging multiple factors within the matrix and doing so expediently. More details on this subject in the near future.

    What say you?

    to see the matrix illustration visit http://www.relationship-economy.com

  • http://www.jonglassett.com Jon Glassett

    Very timely little piece for me personally. I’m dealing with these very issues where I work.

    Thanks for sharing it.

    -Jon

  • http://www.jonglassett.com Jon Glassett

    Very timely little piece for me personally. I’m dealing with these very issues where I work.

    Thanks for sharing it.

    -Jon

  • http://specialization.isforinsects.com/ Seth Woodworth

    …Stock photo. It’s a neat sign, but a picture of the pike place market sign is one of the most commonly used stock photos. I can think of two online photo editing websites that use it as a demo, a couple banner ads that have used it, and far too many blog posts. Many of these examples are even using the exact same photo. I think the picture of yours is actually from a different angle.

    Use Creative Commons material. There is tons and tons of it on flickr and wikipedia. Drop me a line, and I’ll even help you find pictures for your articles. It’d be fun!

  • http://specialization.isforinsects.com/ Seth Woodworth

    …Stock photo. It’s a neat sign, but a picture of the pike place market sign is one of the most commonly used stock photos. I can think of two online photo editing websites that use it as a demo, a couple banner ads that have used it, and far too many blog posts. Many of these examples are even using the exact same photo. I think the picture of yours is actually from a different angle.

    Use Creative Commons material. There is tons and tons of it on flickr and wikipedia. Drop me a line, and I’ll even help you find pictures for your articles. It’d be fun!

  • http://www.chrisbrogan.com chrisbrogan

    That photo came from my own camera. I can show you the original and/or where it was on Flickr. Sorry to disappoint. I can see why it’s a common shot. But that came from my photo tour of Seattle, which is *also* on Flickr (http://flickr.com/photos/chrisbrogan). Thanks for the accusation.

  • http://www.chrisbrogan.com chrisbrogan

    That photo came from my own camera. I can show you the original and/or where it was on Flickr. Sorry to disappoint. I can see why it’s a common shot. But that came from my photo tour of Seattle, which is *also* on Flickr (http://flickr.com/photos/chrisbrogan). Thanks for the accusation.

  • http://www.ldpodcast.com Whitney

    I think what’s happened is people are wrestling with the fact that there is no control. And becoming comfortable with this is difficult for everyone.

    The “old” way, there was an illusion that the company controlled the message it sent through press relases and the like. A one way megaphone. Now that there’s someone on the other end, not only listening, but responding, and not always positively, Companies feel they can’t control the message anymore. It’s not enough to say you are the best- you have to objectively be the best, and now hear all the things you never heard before about your shortcomings and how your product or service could be even better.
    No one can hide now behind substandard work, because everyone can talk about what’s good and what’s bad. Everyone’s accountable.

    It’s going to take some time for this to shake out- where people feel they have to get things out to market quickly, yet be willing to take a few hits for things that aren’t perfect yet. Once we all realize we are going to be accountable for our actions, 24 x 7, there is no more “off stage”-we just need to accept it and act accordingly- don’t be a jerk, because it will come to haunt you later. Count on anything you say in public forums to be something you wouldn’t mind anyone- your mom, your kids, your boss, future employers- anyone -reading.

    Eventually, people will realize they have to do the right thing because they are accountable to do the right thing all the time. We can make mistakes, but untimately, people who are rude or nasty or inappropriate will be called on to explain themselves. This ultimate accountability won’t be easy, but it will make the world a better place. eventually.

    For more on this- see the new sections of Thomas Friedman’s the World is Flat 3.0. Puts into words what all of us in this space already know- All the world’s a stage all all of us are merely players….

  • http://www.ldpodcast.com Whitney

    I think what’s happened is people are wrestling with the fact that there is no control. And becoming comfortable with this is difficult for everyone.

    The “old” way, there was an illusion that the company controlled the message it sent through press relases and the like. A one way megaphone. Now that there’s someone on the other end, not only listening, but responding, and not always positively, Companies feel they can’t control the message anymore. It’s not enough to say you are the best- you have to objectively be the best, and now hear all the things you never heard before about your shortcomings and how your product or service could be even better.
    No one can hide now behind substandard work, because everyone can talk about what’s good and what’s bad. Everyone’s accountable.

    It’s going to take some time for this to shake out- where people feel they have to get things out to market quickly, yet be willing to take a few hits for things that aren’t perfect yet. Once we all realize we are going to be accountable for our actions, 24 x 7, there is no more “off stage”-we just need to accept it and act accordingly- don’t be a jerk, because it will come to haunt you later. Count on anything you say in public forums to be something you wouldn’t mind anyone- your mom, your kids, your boss, future employers- anyone -reading.

    Eventually, people will realize they have to do the right thing because they are accountable to do the right thing all the time. We can make mistakes, but untimately, people who are rude or nasty or inappropriate will be called on to explain themselves. This ultimate accountability won’t be easy, but it will make the world a better place. eventually.

    For more on this- see the new sections of Thomas Friedman’s the World is Flat 3.0. Puts into words what all of us in this space already know- All the world’s a stage all all of us are merely players….

  • http://www.socialset.net/ Nicholas Butler

    Chris,

    I thought Id share with you a iconic moment in the conversations I have been having with a client who is redesigning their website.

    They actually asked me to help them make use of social media and to find the places and websites where they need to be integrating and sharing their content. My client wants to make sure that their conversations can be overheard on more than just their own website. Thats some real progress for a UK Company !

    And Whitney, spot on.

    Nik

  • http://www.socialset.net/ Nicholas Butler

    Chris,

    I thought Id share with you a iconic moment in the conversations I have been having with a client who is redesigning their website.

    They actually asked me to help them make use of social media and to find the places and websites where they need to be integrating and sharing their content. My client wants to make sure that their conversations can be overheard on more than just their own website. Thats some real progress for a UK Company !

    And Whitney, spot on.

    Nik

  • Micheal

    hi i enjoyed the read

  • Micheal

    hi i enjoyed the read

  • Madelynn

    hi nice post, i enjoyed it

  • Madelynn

    hi nice post, i enjoyed it