<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: David Lynch on Product Placement</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.chrisbrogan.com/david-lynch-on-product-placement/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.chrisbrogan.com/david-lynch-on-product-placement/</link>
	<description>Learn How Human Business Works - Beyond Social Media</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 12:25:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Product Placement Paradox at Gypsy Bandito</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisbrogan.com/david-lynch-on-product-placement/comment-page-1/#comment-138905</link>
		<dc:creator>Product Placement Paradox at Gypsy Bandito</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 26 Sep 2008 14:37:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://grasshopperfactory.com/cbc/david-lynch-on-product-placement/#comment-138905</guid>
		<description>[...] came across this in the archives of Chris Brogan&#8217;s blog. Even though I share Lynch&#8217;s frustration, I feel that product placement is kind of [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] came across this in the archives of Chris Brogan&#8217;s blog. Even though I share Lynch&#8217;s frustration, I feel that product placement is kind of [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: CT Moore</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisbrogan.com/david-lynch-on-product-placement/comment-page-1/#comment-138415</link>
		<dc:creator>CT Moore</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 24 Sep 2008 18:57:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://grasshopperfactory.com/cbc/david-lynch-on-product-placement/#comment-138415</guid>
		<description>Ah, brevity is a breath of fresh air, especially on the internet. Don&#039;t you think, Chris?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ah, brevity is a breath of fresh air, especially on the internet. Don&#8217;t you think, Chris?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: CT Moore</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisbrogan.com/david-lynch-on-product-placement/comment-page-1/#comment-234159</link>
		<dc:creator>CT Moore</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 24 Sep 2008 18:57:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://grasshopperfactory.com/cbc/david-lynch-on-product-placement/#comment-234159</guid>
		<description>Ah, brevity is a breath of fresh air, especially on the internet. Don&#039;t you think, Chris?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ah, brevity is a breath of fresh air, especially on the internet. Don&#8217;t you think, Chris?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Monza</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisbrogan.com/david-lynch-on-product-placement/comment-page-1/#comment-18757</link>
		<dc:creator>Monza</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 05 Apr 2007 02:31:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://grasshopperfactory.com/cbc/david-lynch-on-product-placement/#comment-18757</guid>
		<description>IMHO: So long as it does not compromise the message and spirit of the work, what&#039;s the difference...really? Product placement in media is nothing new. The difference is that the once subtle use of product placement has become more noticeable by more &quot;media literate&quot; audiences. 

Observing obvious product placement in any media can spoil the viewing pleasure and credibility of certain works by snapping the attention away from the message. The ideal balance lies in using product placement credibly while leveraging that revenue stream to improve the overall media product and/or its distribution. Not easy...but quite possible in most cases.

Unless of course it is an arrangement where there is a stated requirement for aggressively giving exposure to a product or service within a work as a condition of recieving financial support. In that case, agreeing to such an arrangement will undoubtedly compromise the integrity of the work. That&#039;s just a bad deal to agree to and is best avoided if at all possible.

YMMV</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>IMHO: So long as it does not compromise the message and spirit of the work, what&#8217;s the difference&#8230;really? Product placement in media is nothing new. The difference is that the once subtle use of product placement has become more noticeable by more &#8220;media literate&#8221; audiences. </p>
<p>Observing obvious product placement in any media can spoil the viewing pleasure and credibility of certain works by snapping the attention away from the message. The ideal balance lies in using product placement credibly while leveraging that revenue stream to improve the overall media product and/or its distribution. Not easy&#8230;but quite possible in most cases.</p>
<p>Unless of course it is an arrangement where there is a stated requirement for aggressively giving exposure to a product or service within a work as a condition of recieving financial support. In that case, agreeing to such an arrangement will undoubtedly compromise the integrity of the work. That&#8217;s just a bad deal to agree to and is best avoided if at all possible.</p>
<p>YMMV</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Monza</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisbrogan.com/david-lynch-on-product-placement/comment-page-1/#comment-234158</link>
		<dc:creator>Monza</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 05 Apr 2007 02:31:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://grasshopperfactory.com/cbc/david-lynch-on-product-placement/#comment-234158</guid>
		<description>IMHO: So long as it does not compromise the message and spirit of the work, what&#039;s the difference...really? Product placement in media is nothing new. The difference is that the once subtle use of product placement has become more noticeable by more &quot;media literate&quot; audiences. 

Observing obvious product placement in any media can spoil the viewing pleasure and credibility of certain works by snapping the attention away from the message. The ideal balance lies in using product placement credibly while leveraging that revenue stream to improve the overall media product and/or its distribution. Not easy...but quite possible in most cases.

Unless of course it is an arrangement where there is a stated requirement for aggressively giving exposure to a product or service within a work as a condition of recieving financial support. In that case, agreeing to such an arrangement will undoubtedly compromise the integrity of the work. That&#039;s just a bad deal to agree to and is best avoided if at all possible.

YMMV</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>IMHO: So long as it does not compromise the message and spirit of the work, what&#8217;s the difference&#8230;really? Product placement in media is nothing new. The difference is that the once subtle use of product placement has become more noticeable by more &#8220;media literate&#8221; audiences. </p>
<p>Observing obvious product placement in any media can spoil the viewing pleasure and credibility of certain works by snapping the attention away from the message. The ideal balance lies in using product placement credibly while leveraging that revenue stream to improve the overall media product and/or its distribution. Not easy&#8230;but quite possible in most cases.</p>
<p>Unless of course it is an arrangement where there is a stated requirement for aggressively giving exposure to a product or service within a work as a condition of recieving financial support. In that case, agreeing to such an arrangement will undoubtedly compromise the integrity of the work. That&#8217;s just a bad deal to agree to and is best avoided if at all possible.</p>
<p>YMMV</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jay Moonah</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisbrogan.com/david-lynch-on-product-placement/comment-page-1/#comment-18591</link>
		<dc:creator>Jay Moonah</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 04 Apr 2007 13:22:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://grasshopperfactory.com/cbc/david-lynch-on-product-placement/#comment-18591</guid>
		<description>I love his little look around at the end.  &quot;What?!? What did you expect me to say?&quot;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I love his little look around at the end.  &#8220;What?!? What did you expect me to say?&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jay Moonah</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisbrogan.com/david-lynch-on-product-placement/comment-page-1/#comment-234157</link>
		<dc:creator>Jay Moonah</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 04 Apr 2007 13:22:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://grasshopperfactory.com/cbc/david-lynch-on-product-placement/#comment-234157</guid>
		<description>I love his little look around at the end.  &quot;What?!? What did you expect me to say?&quot;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I love his little look around at the end.  &#8220;What?!? What did you expect me to say?&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sue</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisbrogan.com/david-lynch-on-product-placement/comment-page-1/#comment-18542</link>
		<dc:creator>Sue</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 04 Apr 2007 12:04:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://grasshopperfactory.com/cbc/david-lynch-on-product-placement/#comment-18542</guid>
		<description>Brilliant - totally F$%*in brilliant.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Brilliant &#8211; totally F$%*in brilliant.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sue</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisbrogan.com/david-lynch-on-product-placement/comment-page-1/#comment-234156</link>
		<dc:creator>Sue</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 04 Apr 2007 12:04:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://grasshopperfactory.com/cbc/david-lynch-on-product-placement/#comment-234156</guid>
		<description>Brilliant - totally F$%*in brilliant.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Brilliant &#8211; totally F$%*in brilliant.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

