Find Your Strengths

StrengthsFinder On the recommendation of Whitney Hoffman (or was it Becky? I forget), I went out and got the audio CD for Marcus Buckingham’s “NOW DISCOVER YOUR STRENGTHS.” It was great, but I needed more almost instantly. Because it turns out, the book is just the hook to get you to go take the online test. And not in a bad way. So, I went out and bought StrengthsFinder 2.0, to get the code, and to have the “secret decoder ring” for the assessment.
Basic Premise

The basic premise behind the strengths program is that people should focus on their strengths, not try to tirelessly improve their weaknesses. Sure, manage around your weaknesses, but spend the lion’s share of your work on your strengths. This, of course, runs counter to everything we do.

So, you take this test online that lasts about 35 minutes. The test is based on YEARS of research and tons of adjustments, after asking millions of people their thoughts and insights. When you read all that went into the testing, you come away feeling as if things are really well thought out, and that’s how I felt about the test.

Online Test

You get around 35 minutes to answer several points that are set up like this:

Statement over here …. Neutral … Statement over here.

On the left is strongly agree with the left statement, then some gradient of less to neutral, then stronger again towards the strongly agree with the right statement. Only, the statements are usually not polar opposites. One might be “I feel best when working with a team,” and the other will say, “I take pride in the accomplishments of others.” So lots of times, I found myself saying, “Um… which? ” (By the way, my wife watched me take the test and that was all the more fun, because lots of the answers were really eerily accurate to my life).

The Reports and Action Plans

The report spits out 5 top talents out of 34 in their categories. The authors often stress that you and your colleagues might have some overlapping talents, but it’s the aggregate combination of all five top talents that matters to the strengthsfinder.

Then out comes an action plan showing what you are, and how you might consider augmenting your strengths. You get 10 suggestions for every one of the five strengths they identify for you. This was mostly useful information, though I will say there was some “well, duh” sprinkled in there on mine. I did find myself wishing they’d spent a little more time talking about how to manage around my weaknesses, but the test is built to find my strengths, not point out where I’m lacking.

My 5 Top Talents

As I imagine you’re interested in knowing what my 5 top talents are, here you go:

  • Communication – People who are especially talented in the Communication theme generally find it easy to put their thoughts into words. They are good conversationalists and presenters.

  • Futuristic – People who are especially talented in the Futuristic theme are inspired by the future and what could be. They inspire others with their visions of the future.
  • Woo – People who are especially talented in the Woo theme love the challenge of meeting new people and winning them over. They derive satisfaction from breaking the ice and making a connection with another person.
  • Ideation – People who are especially talented in the Ideation theme are fascinated by ideas. They are able to find connections between seemingly disparate phenomena.
  • Activator – People who are especially talented in the Activator theme can make things happen by turning thoughts into action. They are often impatient.

So, most of that made sense to me. How about you? Do you see that in me? I can see it, I guess. Some of it wasn’t so much a surprise, but how to improve it became the interesting part. The reports and action plans turned out to be the interesting part.

What’s In It For You?

I recommend spending the $20 for the book (cheaper at the Amazon link below – and I might make 70 cents off your purchase). I think it was interesting where they wanted me to take my strengths, and I think it’s a great exercise for not too much cash. They’re using this in lots of organizations lately, and it might prove interesting for you to consider yourself from the point of view of your strengths.

The best thing for the money I spent was that I got peace of mind that I’m on the right path.

So, if you want a copy, here’s a link:

StrengthsFinder 2.0

And if you have taken the test, what are your strengths? I’d love to talk more with you about this.

ChrisBrogan.com runs on the Genesis Framework

Genesis Theme Framework

The Genesis Framework empowers you to quickly and easily build incredible websites with WordPress. Whether you're a novice or advanced developer, Genesis provides you with the secure and search-engine-optimized foundation that takes WordPress to places you never thought it could go.

With automatic theme updates and world-class support included, Genesis is the smart choice for your WordPress website or blog.

Become a StudioPress Affiliate

  • http://christianburns.wordpress.com/ Christian Burns

    I looks fascinating. It sounds like when I took the Kiersey temperament test http://keirsey.com/matrix.html from the book Please Understand Me and it pegged me as 1 of 16 temperaments. Then went on to talk about my strengths and weaknesses. I would like to see how an online test like FYS2.0 could connect people so that we can move forward.

  • http://christianburns.wordpress.com/ Christian Burns

    I looks fascinating. It sounds like when I took the Kiersey temperament test http://keirsey.com/matrix.html from the book Please Understand Me and it pegged me as 1 of 16 temperaments. Then went on to talk about my strengths and weaknesses. I would like to see how an online test like FYS2.0 could connect people so that we can move forward.

  • http://christianburns.wordpress.com/ Christian Burns

    I looks fascinating. It sounds like when I took the Kiersey temperament test http://keirsey.com/matrix.html from the book Please Understand Me and it pegged me as 1 of 16 temperaments. Then went on to talk about my strengths and weaknesses. I would like to see how an online test like FYS2.0 could connect people so that we can move forward.

  • http://www.successful-blog.com Liz Strauss

    I’ve seen this used across an entire company of over 100 people and with over 25 who reported directly to me. It was helpful in knowing how folks managed information and each other.

    We had meetings to discuss the traits and what we saw in each one — both the up and down sides. It helped most folks understand where they get stuck.

    Yeah I think that the words you wrote describe the guy I met darn well. :)

  • http://www.successful-blog.com Liz Strauss

    I’ve seen this used across an entire company of over 100 people and with over 25 who reported directly to me. It was helpful in knowing how folks managed information and each other.

    We had meetings to discuss the traits and what we saw in each one — both the up and down sides. It helped most folks understand where they get stuck.

    Yeah I think that the words you wrote describe the guy I met darn well. :)

  • http://www.successful-blog.com Liz Strauss

    I’ve seen this used across an entire company of over 100 people and with over 25 who reported directly to me. It was helpful in knowing how folks managed information and each other.

    We had meetings to discuss the traits and what we saw in each one — both the up and down sides. It helped most folks understand where they get stuck.

    Yeah I think that the words you wrote describe the guy I met darn well. :)

  • Pingback: Find Your Strengths at ChrysTay.com | Self Help | Personal Growth

  • http://www.ldpodcast.com Whitney

    I am a HUGE believer in this. The Gallup people even have a version geared towards kids ages 10 to 14, -www.Strengthsexplorer.com and then http://www.strengthsquest.com for teens and college age people.

    I have done both the Marcus Buckingham Version and the Strengths 2.0 version. My latest top 5 are Ideation, Connectedness, Input, Individualization, and Strategic. My “original” top 5 with the test I took about two years ago were Input, Learner, Empathy, Ideation and Relator. Clearly, there is consistency here, and I think anyone who has met me and knows me will think “well, that’s not a surprise” but it was tremendously useful for me to hear this news.
    Why?
    Sometimes we have very little insight into what make us tick. This is why therapists make so much money. We see ourselves in an interactive sense with the world, but we rarely get an outside objective view on what makes us special, or annoying, for that matter. Even your best friends avoid taking an inventory of your faults and letting you know about it, in part for fear they’ll get the same objective view back, and it can hurt.
    Yet finding out what makes you special and valuable not only lets you concentrate on the good stuff, but it helps convince you that the good stuff, in that combination, is what makes you You. And it is “good enough”. And you can then cop to outsourcing the stuff you’re not especially good at with a reasonable excuse- This is hard for me, but easy for you- can you help me with this, and I can help you with that? That is the key to building an effective team.

    And if no one knows their own strengths and failings, how do you capitalize on the talent you already have, as well as searching for the pieces you might be missing? How can you do what you do best if you have no idea what that means?

    So clearly, I have a passion for this topic (and I’ll stop now) but I believe to my bones that the cornerstone to success is knowing your own strengths and then capitalizing on them. And this is one of the 101 courses in the fantasy curriculum I keep playing with for a real new media school. But this is a subject for another day.

    Perhaps the time for the New Media Book Club is now?

  • http://www.ldpodcast.com Whitney

    I am a HUGE believer in this. The Gallup people even have a version geared towards kids ages 10 to 14, -www.Strengthsexplorer.com and then http://www.strengthsquest.com for teens and college age people.

    I have done both the Marcus Buckingham Version and the Strengths 2.0 version. My latest top 5 are Ideation, Connectedness, Input, Individualization, and Strategic. My “original” top 5 with the test I took about two years ago were Input, Learner, Empathy, Ideation and Relator. Clearly, there is consistency here, and I think anyone who has met me and knows me will think “well, that’s not a surprise” but it was tremendously useful for me to hear this news.
    Why?
    Sometimes we have very little insight into what make us tick. This is why therapists make so much money. We see ourselves in an interactive sense with the world, but we rarely get an outside objective view on what makes us special, or annoying, for that matter. Even your best friends avoid taking an inventory of your faults and letting you know about it, in part for fear they’ll get the same objective view back, and it can hurt.
    Yet finding out what makes you special and valuable not only lets you concentrate on the good stuff, but it helps convince you that the good stuff, in that combination, is what makes you You. And it is “good enough”. And you can then cop to outsourcing the stuff you’re not especially good at with a reasonable excuse- This is hard for me, but easy for you- can you help me with this, and I can help you with that? That is the key to building an effective team.

    And if no one knows their own strengths and failings, how do you capitalize on the talent you already have, as well as searching for the pieces you might be missing? How can you do what you do best if you have no idea what that means?

    So clearly, I have a passion for this topic (and I’ll stop now) but I believe to my bones that the cornerstone to success is knowing your own strengths and then capitalizing on them. And this is one of the 101 courses in the fantasy curriculum I keep playing with for a real new media school. But this is a subject for another day.

    Perhaps the time for the New Media Book Club is now?

  • http://www.ldpodcast.com Whitney

    I am a HUGE believer in this. The Gallup people even have a version geared towards kids ages 10 to 14, -www.Strengthsexplorer.com and then http://www.strengthsquest.com for teens and college age people.

    I have done both the Marcus Buckingham Version and the Strengths 2.0 version. My latest top 5 are Ideation, Connectedness, Input, Individualization, and Strategic. My “original” top 5 with the test I took about two years ago were Input, Learner, Empathy, Ideation and Relator. Clearly, there is consistency here, and I think anyone who has met me and knows me will think “well, that’s not a surprise” but it was tremendously useful for me to hear this news.
    Why?
    Sometimes we have very little insight into what make us tick. This is why therapists make so much money. We see ourselves in an interactive sense with the world, but we rarely get an outside objective view on what makes us special, or annoying, for that matter. Even your best friends avoid taking an inventory of your faults and letting you know about it, in part for fear they’ll get the same objective view back, and it can hurt.
    Yet finding out what makes you special and valuable not only lets you concentrate on the good stuff, but it helps convince you that the good stuff, in that combination, is what makes you You. And it is “good enough”. And you can then cop to outsourcing the stuff you’re not especially good at with a reasonable excuse- This is hard for me, but easy for you- can you help me with this, and I can help you with that? That is the key to building an effective team.

    And if no one knows their own strengths and failings, how do you capitalize on the talent you already have, as well as searching for the pieces you might be missing? How can you do what you do best if you have no idea what that means?

    So clearly, I have a passion for this topic (and I’ll stop now) but I believe to my bones that the cornerstone to success is knowing your own strengths and then capitalizing on them. And this is one of the 101 courses in the fantasy curriculum I keep playing with for a real new media school. But this is a subject for another day.

    Perhaps the time for the New Media Book Club is now?

  • http://www.successful-blog.com Liz Strauss

    Whitney,
    How is the 2.0 version different from the original?

  • http://www.successful-blog.com Liz Strauss

    Whitney,
    How is the 2.0 version different from the original?

  • http://www.successful-blog.com Liz Strauss

    Whitney,
    How is the 2.0 version different from the original?

  • http://www.chrisbrogan.com chrisbrogan

    They took what they learned from the 1.0 experience and they tuned it up even more. They found thousands of interesting new data points and mapped them back into the system, making it even tighter and more likely to mirror one’s strengths.

  • http://www.chrisbrogan.com chrisbrogan

    They took what they learned from the 1.0 experience and they tuned it up even more. They found thousands of interesting new data points and mapped them back into the system, making it even tighter and more likely to mirror one’s strengths.

  • http://www.chrisbrogan.com chrisbrogan

    They took what they learned from the 1.0 experience and they tuned it up even more. They found thousands of interesting new data points and mapped them back into the system, making it even tighter and more likely to mirror one’s strengths.

  • http://www.successful-blog.com Liz Strauss

    I’ll have to check it out again. Thanks, Chris!

  • http://www.successful-blog.com Liz Strauss

    I’ll have to check it out again. Thanks, Chris!

  • http://www.successful-blog.com Liz Strauss

    I’ll have to check it out again. Thanks, Chris!

  • http://www.nerds-central.com Alex Turner

    I guess one of my strengths is not giving money away to other people for them to tell me about something I said – which is what this test proposes to do.

    This is far to commercial for my taste. How about making the test free and then selling consulting off the back of it? That way everyone benefits.

    Anyhow – thanks for the daily does of enthusiasm! I’d watch that ideation – is that anything like infarction? Is it treatable?

    From your writing – here is what I think you are.

    1) Idealistic
    2) Creative
    3) Motivational
    4) Optimistic
    5) Future looking
    6) Caring
    7) Naive – in a charming kind of way

    And you did not have to pay a penny ;)

  • http://www.nerds-central.com Alex Turner

    I guess one of my strengths is not giving money away to other people for them to tell me about something I said – which is what this test proposes to do.

    This is far to commercial for my taste. How about making the test free and then selling consulting off the back of it? That way everyone benefits.

    Anyhow – thanks for the daily does of enthusiasm! I’d watch that ideation – is that anything like infarction? Is it treatable?

    From your writing – here is what I think you are.

    1) Idealistic
    2) Creative
    3) Motivational
    4) Optimistic
    5) Future looking
    6) Caring
    7) Naive – in a charming kind of way

    And you did not have to pay a penny ;)

  • http://www.nerds-central.com Alex Turner

    I guess one of my strengths is not giving money away to other people for them to tell me about something I said – which is what this test proposes to do.

    This is far to commercial for my taste. How about making the test free and then selling consulting off the back of it? That way everyone benefits.

    Anyhow – thanks for the daily does of enthusiasm! I’d watch that ideation – is that anything like infarction? Is it treatable?

    From your writing – here is what I think you are.

    1) Idealistic
    2) Creative
    3) Motivational
    4) Optimistic
    5) Future looking
    6) Caring
    7) Naive – in a charming kind of way

    And you did not have to pay a penny ;)

  • http://www.24stgeorge.com Dale Cruse

    Sounds interesting, Chris. You said, “So, if you want a copy, here’s a link:” but then I didn’t see any link.

  • http://www.24stgeorge.com Dale Cruse

    Sounds interesting, Chris. You said, “So, if you want a copy, here’s a link:” but then I didn’t see any link.

  • http://www.24stgeorge.com Dale Cruse

    Sounds interesting, Chris. You said, “So, if you want a copy, here’s a link:” but then I didn’t see any link.

  • http://mylifechanges.typepad.com/less_stress_more_cool_/ Terry

    People are scared of the truth.

    I read the best parts of the book standing up at the bookstore. I already own too many.

    I did a professional evaluation of myself not long ago…
    My top six were
    Creative production – brainstorming new ideas…
    Altruism – regularly helping others with their individual or business concerns….
    Autonomy – independence..
    Intellectual Challenge – self explanatory
    Lifestyle – ample time to pursue other important aspects of my lifestyle…
    Strategic Thinking – grasp the big picture; work with a vision of the whole project and the long term…
    Best
    Terry

  • http://mylifechanges.typepad.com/less_stress_more_cool_/ Terry

    People are scared of the truth.

    I read the best parts of the book standing up at the bookstore. I already own too many.

    I did a professional evaluation of myself not long ago…
    My top six were
    Creative production – brainstorming new ideas…
    Altruism – regularly helping others with their individual or business concerns….
    Autonomy – independence..
    Intellectual Challenge – self explanatory
    Lifestyle – ample time to pursue other important aspects of my lifestyle…
    Strategic Thinking – grasp the big picture; work with a vision of the whole project and the long term…
    Best
    Terry

  • http://mylifechanges.typepad.com/less_stress_more_cool_/ Terry

    People are scared of the truth.

    I read the best parts of the book standing up at the bookstore. I already own too many.

    I did a professional evaluation of myself not long ago…
    My top six were
    Creative production – brainstorming new ideas…
    Altruism – regularly helping others with their individual or business concerns….
    Autonomy – independence..
    Intellectual Challenge – self explanatory
    Lifestyle – ample time to pursue other important aspects of my lifestyle…
    Strategic Thinking – grasp the big picture; work with a vision of the whole project and the long term…
    Best
    Terry

  • http://www.chrisbrogan.com chrisbrogan

    Turns out what I need to find in my life are more people into execution and follow through. It’s great to be a guy with vision and eyes on the future, but without a team of people willing to do all the i-dotting and t-crossing, nothing happens. Unexecuted dreams are just as useless as no dreams.

  • http://www.chrisbrogan.com chrisbrogan

    Turns out what I need to find in my life are more people into execution and follow through. It’s great to be a guy with vision and eyes on the future, but without a team of people willing to do all the i-dotting and t-crossing, nothing happens. Unexecuted dreams are just as useless as no dreams.

  • http://www.chrisbrogan.com chrisbrogan

    Turns out what I need to find in my life are more people into execution and follow through. It’s great to be a guy with vision and eyes on the future, but without a team of people willing to do all the i-dotting and t-crossing, nothing happens. Unexecuted dreams are just as useless as no dreams.

  • http://www.nerds-central.com Alex Turner

    Chris,

    Just keep churning out the dreams. One day one or two will take root and then you can run with them and a team. It is not possible to directly predict which ideas will be successful and which will die on their feet.

    The snag with dream chasing like that (I should know – I have chased a few) is that it does not put food on the table!

  • http://www.nerds-central.com Alex Turner

    Chris,

    Just keep churning out the dreams. One day one or two will take root and then you can run with them and a team. It is not possible to directly predict which ideas will be successful and which will die on their feet.

    The snag with dream chasing like that (I should know – I have chased a few) is that it does not put food on the table!

  • http://www.ldpodcast.com Whitney

    The point of doing this data based assessment rather than just self-examination is the fact that it IS data driven, and describes strengths with 34 particular words, forming a common language about strengths we can all share. When Chris says his strength is Woo, I don’t need a decoder ring to know what means, and it helps me to understand him better.

    Hopefully, the reverse works as well. When Chris sees my list, he’ll understand the reason why I tick. That taking all the shiny new ideas out and playing with them is what I like, along with then taking them and forming strategies to bring them into fruition. Knowing how to connect to individuals and deepen relationships is also a strength, meaning that on any hypothetical team, Chris might be better at making initial connections, but I might be better at using the connected and individualization talents to make sure those same people feel special and important, and not just one of the crowd. You need all these things is a larger organization, and you do best when you can maximize the talents of everyone on your team.

    So from my POV, this is not some silly exercise or a waste of money on some other management book that will rot on your shelf. It’s about getting to know how you and your brain are wired, and how to maximize your native potential.
    Or not.
    But this is the stuff that gets me really excited, because it is the key to SO much more.

  • http://www.ldpodcast.com Whitney

    The point of doing this data based assessment rather than just self-examination is the fact that it IS data driven, and describes strengths with 34 particular words, forming a common language about strengths we can all share. When Chris says his strength is Woo, I don’t need a decoder ring to know what means, and it helps me to understand him better.

    Hopefully, the reverse works as well. When Chris sees my list, he’ll understand the reason why I tick. That taking all the shiny new ideas out and playing with them is what I like, along with then taking them and forming strategies to bring them into fruition. Knowing how to connect to individuals and deepen relationships is also a strength, meaning that on any hypothetical team, Chris might be better at making initial connections, but I might be better at using the connected and individualization talents to make sure those same people feel special and important, and not just one of the crowd. You need all these things is a larger organization, and you do best when you can maximize the talents of everyone on your team.

    So from my POV, this is not some silly exercise or a waste of money on some other management book that will rot on your shelf. It’s about getting to know how you and your brain are wired, and how to maximize your native potential.
    Or not.
    But this is the stuff that gets me really excited, because it is the key to SO much more.

  • http://www.ldpodcast.com Whitney

    The point of doing this data based assessment rather than just self-examination is the fact that it IS data driven, and describes strengths with 34 particular words, forming a common language about strengths we can all share. When Chris says his strength is Woo, I don’t need a decoder ring to know what means, and it helps me to understand him better.

    Hopefully, the reverse works as well. When Chris sees my list, he’ll understand the reason why I tick. That taking all the shiny new ideas out and playing with them is what I like, along with then taking them and forming strategies to bring them into fruition. Knowing how to connect to individuals and deepen relationships is also a strength, meaning that on any hypothetical team, Chris might be better at making initial connections, but I might be better at using the connected and individualization talents to make sure those same people feel special and important, and not just one of the crowd. You need all these things is a larger organization, and you do best when you can maximize the talents of everyone on your team.

    So from my POV, this is not some silly exercise or a waste of money on some other management book that will rot on your shelf. It’s about getting to know how you and your brain are wired, and how to maximize your native potential.
    Or not.
    But this is the stuff that gets me really excited, because it is the key to SO much more.

  • http://www.successful-blog.com Liz Strauss

    I’m with you, Whitney!
    Having used this with a sizable group, the benefits of having a common vocabulary are the same as with any project — we don’t confuse each other further.

    Even moreso, the inventory brings up ideas/strengths that aren’t those we might readily differentiate, such as the fine line between WOO and Relator. Most folks I know would have considered them to be the same thing. Yet when we worked together as a group and discussed who had one, the other, or both, we could see the differences in behavior — in ourselves and others.

    To toss it aside and consider one’s subjective self-evalutation as the only important information, to me, is the same as using any single data source blindly.

  • http://www.successful-blog.com Liz Strauss

    I’m with you, Whitney!
    Having used this with a sizable group, the benefits of having a common vocabulary are the same as with any project — we don’t confuse each other further.

    Even moreso, the inventory brings up ideas/strengths that aren’t those we might readily differentiate, such as the fine line between WOO and Relator. Most folks I know would have considered them to be the same thing. Yet when we worked together as a group and discussed who had one, the other, or both, we could see the differences in behavior — in ourselves and others.

    To toss it aside and consider one’s subjective self-evalutation as the only important information, to me, is the same as using any single data source blindly.

  • http://www.successful-blog.com Liz Strauss

    I’m with you, Whitney!
    Having used this with a sizable group, the benefits of having a common vocabulary are the same as with any project — we don’t confuse each other further.

    Even moreso, the inventory brings up ideas/strengths that aren’t those we might readily differentiate, such as the fine line between WOO and Relator. Most folks I know would have considered them to be the same thing. Yet when we worked together as a group and discussed who had one, the other, or both, we could see the differences in behavior — in ourselves and others.

    To toss it aside and consider one’s subjective self-evalutation as the only important information, to me, is the same as using any single data source blindly.

  • Pingback: Strengths-Based Personal Development - lifehack.org

  • http://lynnoconnornotes.blogspot.com/ Lynn O’Connor

    I haven’t taken the test yet, but I’m going to, it seems interesting. As a psychologist/researcher and clinician, I’ve been using a strength-based approach with clients for years now, in contrast to the often-used “focus on weaknesses” product of clinical training. Focusing on strengths leads to rapid progress in psychotherapy. People come to therapy often expecting to be criticized, to have the therapist tell them what is “wrong” with them and their psychology. Going for weaknesses, for negative emotions, sadness, experiences of misery, tends to go nowhere and not infrequently leads to clients getting worse instead of getting better. Some traditional therapists –upon seeing rapid client progress– denigrate this movement, calling it a “flight to health” as if it represents running away from the dark “truth” that “must be faced.” A strength-based approach to self-improvement is as effective (or more so) as is a strength-based approach to psychotherapy. If a therapist tells anyone (in one way or another) “you need to focus on your problems” the client should run as fast as possible, right out the door. Now I’m going to follow the lead and find out what my own strengths are. Thanks for the support of the strength-based approach to improvement and to life.

  • http://lynnoconnornotes.blogspot.com/ Lynn O’Connor

    I haven’t taken the test yet, but I’m going to, it seems interesting. As a psychologist/researcher and clinician, I’ve been using a strength-based approach with clients for years now, in contrast to the often-used “focus on weaknesses” product of clinical training. Focusing on strengths leads to rapid progress in psychotherapy. People come to therapy often expecting to be criticized, to have the therapist tell them what is “wrong” with them and their psychology. Going for weaknesses, for negative emotions, sadness, experiences of misery, tends to go nowhere and not infrequently leads to clients getting worse instead of getting better. Some traditional therapists –upon seeing rapid client progress– denigrate this movement, calling it a “flight to health” as if it represents running away from the dark “truth” that “must be faced.” A strength-based approach to self-improvement is as effective (or more so) as is a strength-based approach to psychotherapy. If a therapist tells anyone (in one way or another) “you need to focus on your problems” the client should run as fast as possible, right out the door. Now I’m going to follow the lead and find out what my own strengths are. Thanks for the support of the strength-based approach to improvement and to life.

  • http://lynnoconnornotes.blogspot.com/ Lynn O’Connor

    I haven’t taken the test yet, but I’m going to, it seems interesting. As a psychologist/researcher and clinician, I’ve been using a strength-based approach with clients for years now, in contrast to the often-used “focus on weaknesses” product of clinical training. Focusing on strengths leads to rapid progress in psychotherapy. People come to therapy often expecting to be criticized, to have the therapist tell them what is “wrong” with them and their psychology. Going for weaknesses, for negative emotions, sadness, experiences of misery, tends to go nowhere and not infrequently leads to clients getting worse instead of getting better. Some traditional therapists –upon seeing rapid client progress– denigrate this movement, calling it a “flight to health” as if it represents running away from the dark “truth” that “must be faced.” A strength-based approach to self-improvement is as effective (or more so) as is a strength-based approach to psychotherapy. If a therapist tells anyone (in one way or another) “you need to focus on your problems” the client should run as fast as possible, right out the door. Now I’m going to follow the lead and find out what my own strengths are. Thanks for the support of the strength-based approach to improvement and to life.

  • http://www.chrisbrogan.com chrisbrogan

    Great to hear from you, Lynn. Thanks for your thoughts on this. It certainly makes sense what you’re describing, including the part of explaining how the traditionalists see the approach.

    Let us know what you come up with on the test.

    –Chris…

  • http://www.chrisbrogan.com chrisbrogan

    Great to hear from you, Lynn. Thanks for your thoughts on this. It certainly makes sense what you’re describing, including the part of explaining how the traditionalists see the approach.

    Let us know what you come up with on the test.

    –Chris…

  • http://www.chrisbrogan.com chrisbrogan

    Great to hear from you, Lynn. Thanks for your thoughts on this. It certainly makes sense what you’re describing, including the part of explaining how the traditionalists see the approach.

    Let us know what you come up with on the test.

    –Chris…

  • Name

    As good as this StrengthsFinder thing might be, its a rip-off and a way to make some PhD dude a little richer. My wife bought the book hoping it would be a way for us to improve upon the strenghts of our entire family. Well, she took the test all right, but what they don't tell you is that the little code on the book can only be used once. Apparently, someone already used the code from our book, and even if they hadn't only one person could take the test, unless you want to buy more books. Ha! Again, what a rip-off!

  • bobjones1

    As good as this StrengthsFinder thing might be, its a rip-off and a way to make some PhD dude a little richer. My wife bought the book hoping it would be a way for us to improve upon the strenghts of our entire family. Well, she took the test all right, but what they don't tell you is that the little code on the book can only be used once. Apparently, someone already used the code from our book, and even if they hadn't only one person could take the test, unless you want to buy more books. Ha! Again, what a rip-off!

  • Name

    As good as this StrengthsFinder thing might be, its a rip-off and a way to make some PhD dude a little richer. My wife bought the book hoping it would be a way for us to improve upon the strenghts of our entire family. Well, she took the test all right, but what they don't tell you is that the little code on the book can only be used once. Apparently, someone already used the code from our book, and even if they hadn't only one person could take the test, unless you want to buy more books. Ha! Again, what a rip-off!

  • Name

    As good as this StrengthsFinder thing might be, its a rip-off and a way to make some PhD dude a little richer. My wife bought the book hoping it would be a way for us to improve upon the strenghts of our entire family. Well, she took the test all right, but what they don't tell you is that the little code on the book can only be used once. Apparently, someone already used the code from our book, and even if they hadn't only one person could take the test, unless you want to buy more books. Ha! Again, what a rip-off!

GetSocial