How to Use Friendfeed as a Collaborative Business Tool

teacher The social media aggregation software, Friendfeed has much more value than one might originally think. The tool lets you add several disparate parts of your social web use into one spot (it collects your blog, your Flickr account, your upcoming.org event list, your bookmarks, etc).

Most people use this as a way to share a more enriched experience with friends and colleagues. But I think there’s a business opportunity in using the tool for collaborative business. Remember, Friendfeed can collect your status information, your presence, media from several sources, your bookmarks. There are many ways to use that. Here’s one set of use cases to consider for that purpose.

How to Use Friendfeed as a Collaborative Business Tool

  1. Sign up for an account on Friendfeed.
  2. On the “me” tab, on the right where it says “services,” click “Edit/add.”
  3. Add appropriate accounts. (See below).

Here’s where it gets interesting. You can do lots of things at this point. Let’s list several possible use cases:

  • Add any company blogs of relevance.
  • Add any external blogs of relevance.
  • Add search terms via Technorati and Google Blogsearch.
  • Add search terms via Twitter Search (here’s how to search Twitter).
  • Add any Flickr (or other web-based) photo groups.
  • Add location-based data via Brightkite.
  • Add relevant news services using their RSS subscription URLs.
  • Add YouTube videos.
  • Add Delicious.com for social bookmarks.
  • Lots more.

So, pick a few things from the about to think about. If you had lots of people in multiple locations, one way to dashboard their locale would be to have all of them add a Brightkite account, and you could “friend” them and invite them into a group. Pow, instant location-status-presence. There are many ways to configure the 43 or so apps that plug into Friendfeed to be useful for your business.

  1. Add your coworkers’ accounts as friends.
  2. Create a group and invite those friends to the group.
  3. Send private updates to the group. Send more public facing ones to the public timeline.

Friendfeed provides many opportunities to go further than just collecting information in one place. I’m sure there are some other ideas for application of what I’ve just covered that you could improve upon. What do you think? How else could you see this being used?

Photo credit, foundphotoslj

Reblog this post [with Zemanta]

Related posts:

  1. How Do I Add FriendFeed Comments to My Blog
  2. FriendFeed- The Hidden Conversation
  3. Alert Thingy Helps Make FriendFeed Indispensible
  4. Alltop Launches Frienderati to Help You Find FriendFeed Friends
  5. Blog Topics for Business to Business Customers

ChrisBrogan.com runs on the Genesis Framework

Genesis Theme Framework

The Genesis Framework empowers you to quickly and easily build incredible websites with WordPress. Whether you're a novice or advanced developer, Genesis provides you with the secure and search-engine-optimized foundation that takes WordPress to places you never thought it could go.

With automatic theme updates and world-class support included, Genesis is the smart choice for your WordPress website or blog.

Become a StudioPress Affiliate

  • http://brad.bradwelltv.com bradleybradwell

    This seems pretty interesting. I don’t think that i would use it though. I don’t really care for friend feed. The idea is good, but still needs some work and improvement. Agree?

  • http://brad.bradwelltv.com bradleybradwell

    This seems pretty interesting. I don’t think that i would use it though. I don’t really care for friend feed. The idea is good, but still needs some work and improvement. Agree?

  • Pingback: Chris Brogan: How to [really] Use FriendFeed « michsineath.com

  • http://www.changenow.de André Loibl

    Hi Chris,
    there are some interesting points in there – I thought of FF as a social marketing instrument – but there are more possibilities, you’re right!
    Thanks for sharing! :-)
    André

  • http://nlupus.tumblr.com Sasha Kovaliov

    Cool, it’s like a free intranet.

    There is only one concern – who holds all the info?

  • http://www.changenow.de André Loibl

    Hi Chris,
    there are some interesting points in there – I thought of FF as a social marketing instrument – but there are more possibilities, you’re right!
    Thanks for sharing! :-)
    André

  • http://nlupus.tumblr.com Sasha Kovaliov

    Cool, it’s like a free intranet.

    There is only one concern – who holds all the info?

  • http://www.lostartofblogging.com Tibi Puiu

    Hmm, this could actually work out pretty well. Great thinking, Chris!

  • http://www.lostartofblogging.com Tibi Puiu

    Hmm, this could actually work out pretty well. Great thinking, Chris!

  • http://amichitwood.blogspot.com Ami Chitwood

    Chris – I like the list and suggestion to use FF as a collaborative tool for business; however, and this is something I am struggling with in my own business universes, you assume that with tools like FF or even delicious that folks are singing off the same page and have the same level of interest, ability, inclination and just plain philosophy around sharing what they are reading and what they know.

    One of the ways I’m working on this is to get folks to see that these tools can help in THEIR own worlds (stay on top of industry trends, be in the know, find their saved bookmarks) – THEN, there’s the sharing component.

    How often do I get hit with “I don’t have time to fill out my profile” or “why would I spend time contributing to a wiki” or “who cares what others are reading online.” Could be my particular environments and/or the lack of understanding that to be a knowledge worker today (whether you are client facing or not) means you need to stay on top of ways to organize your own content in addition to sharing with others.

  • http://amichitwood.blogspot.com Ami Chitwood

    Chris – I like the list and suggestion to use FF as a collaborative tool for business; however, and this is something I am struggling with in my own business universes, you assume that with tools like FF or even delicious that folks are singing off the same page and have the same level of interest, ability, inclination and just plain philosophy around sharing what they are reading and what they know.

    One of the ways I’m working on this is to get folks to see that these tools can help in THEIR own worlds (stay on top of industry trends, be in the know, find their saved bookmarks) – THEN, there’s the sharing component.

    How often do I get hit with “I don’t have time to fill out my profile” or “why would I spend time contributing to a wiki” or “who cares what others are reading online.” Could be my particular environments and/or the lack of understanding that to be a knowledge worker today (whether you are client facing or not) means you need to stay on top of ways to organize your own content in addition to sharing with others.

  • http://www.saranx.com Saravanan Sahadevan

    Friend Feed is great but just how many people would actually use it?

    Majority of people prefer to stick to seperate social networks. Do correct me if I’m wrong.

    Somehow until today, I have never had the thing for Friendfeed. I guess it still misses something.

  • http://www.saranx.com Saravanan Sahadevan

    Friend Feed is great but just how many people would actually use it?

    Majority of people prefer to stick to seperate social networks. Do correct me if I’m wrong.

    Somehow until today, I have never had the thing for Friendfeed. I guess it still misses something.

  • http://www.thebdgway.com Chris Bucchere

    Every article I read about the over-hyped and underwhelming Friendfeed neglects to mention that Yahoo! Pipes (which was released in early 2007) does all of the aggregation that FF does, but a whole lot better. If you can’t afford to buy/build your own enterprise software for your company’s intranet (and you don’t mind exposing all your data to the internet), then I would use Pipes over Friendfeed hands down.

    And no, I don’t work for Yahoo!.

    Besides, for most enterprises — especially financial institutions and the military/gov’t — this sort of willy-nilly cloud-based aggregation is totally out of the question anyway. For anything to serve as a viable intranet, it needs to be hosted behind the company’s firewall or by a trusted 3rd party in a secure, SSL-based SaaS environment. Friendfeed is neither of those things. So while it works fine for aggregating stuff that’s meant for public consumption, it would never work for a true enterprise intranet.

  • http://www.thebdgway.com Chris Bucchere

    Every article I read about the over-hyped and underwhelming Friendfeed neglects to mention that Yahoo! Pipes (which was released in early 2007) does all of the aggregation that FF does, but a whole lot better. If you can’t afford to buy/build your own enterprise software for your company’s intranet (and you don’t mind exposing all your data to the internet), then I would use Pipes over Friendfeed hands down.

    And no, I don’t work for Yahoo!.

    Besides, for most enterprises — especially financial institutions and the military/gov’t — this sort of willy-nilly cloud-based aggregation is totally out of the question anyway. For anything to serve as a viable intranet, it needs to be hosted behind the company’s firewall or by a trusted 3rd party in a secure, SSL-based SaaS environment. Friendfeed is neither of those things. So while it works fine for aggregating stuff that’s meant for public consumption, it would never work for a true enterprise intranet.

  • http://smallbusinesstech.wordpress.com/ Andrew

    Interested article with useful info, thanks for sharing. I was going to give friendfeed a miss, but think I will investigate further now. :)

  • http://smallbusinesstech.wordpress.com/ Andrew

    Interested article with useful info, thanks for sharing. I was going to give friendfeed a miss, but think I will investigate further now. :)

  • http://chrisheuer.com/ Chris Heuer

    Unfortunately not everyone’s company can provide real IT support for all the different team’s needs… that is another form of a cloud computing strategy, expecting the average IT dept to properly support a team of people who are used to collaborating using 2.0 tools – wish it was the case, but almost all big companies I know (and I know a few) do not properly support their various constituencies

    Most importantly, this sort of usage is great for a smaller company with no IT department, or a non-profit, or any ad-hoc group. For Social Media Club, we replaced our mailing list with the Friend Feed Room. Just yesterday I created a private room for a research project my agency is doing.

    This option is also great for a project extranet – easier to share info in then a wiki, especially when those tools are behind the firewall and the people you need to share with are outside of one.

    The key to any IT based collaboration effort is to get everyone to agree to use the same place for storing their stuff and connecting with each other. No technology is a single silver bullet for the people challenges we face in group collaboration, but when you install the FF bookmarklet in your browser, it sure makes it a whole lot easier for people to see how simple it can be…

  • http://chrisheuer.com/ Chris Heuer

    Unfortunately not everyone’s company can provide real IT support for all the different team’s needs… that is another form of a cloud computing strategy, expecting the average IT dept to properly support a team of people who are used to collaborating using 2.0 tools – wish it was the case, but almost all big companies I know (and I know a few) do not properly support their various constituencies

    Most importantly, this sort of usage is great for a smaller company with no IT department, or a non-profit, or any ad-hoc group. For Social Media Club, we replaced our mailing list with the Friend Feed Room. Just yesterday I created a private room for a research project my agency is doing.

    This option is also great for a project extranet – easier to share info in then a wiki, especially when those tools are behind the firewall and the people you need to share with are outside of one.

    The key to any IT based collaboration effort is to get everyone to agree to use the same place for storing their stuff and connecting with each other. No technology is a single silver bullet for the people challenges we face in group collaboration, but when you install the FF bookmarklet in your browser, it sure makes it a whole lot easier for people to see how simple it can be…

  • http://twitter.com/franswaa frank

    Interesting idea for sure.

    I’m just getting into friendsfeed personally so the main use of bringing all my social tools into one place has been my focus.

    That said – I like the idea here. Though others have brought up good points about security and the like.

    At the end of the day I think its about possibilities and being creative with the tools we have. Its not going to work in every case, but my world it could be great for sharing non secure information and communication. As well as a ‘teaching’ type of thing to get more and more people using and understanding the social web. I work at a tech. Co, but not everyone stays up on current tech. – a lot of people just focus on what we do.

    __
    http://twitter.com/franswaa

  • http://www.twitterthoughts.com Roger

    Great ideas Chris. This menu of items (or something similar) might be integrated into strategies we recommend to clients. But as the other commenters have alluded to, what does FF provide that other apps do not? There is an issue here, that I and others have discussed, related to consolidating social media to a point where standardization provides needed efficiencies. Until such a system comes along (or emerges from the morass of apps presently available – will it be FF?) I think it will be a challenge to justify the ROI of such approaches to business.

  • http://twitter.com/franswaa frank

    Interesting idea for sure.

    I’m just getting into friendsfeed personally so the main use of bringing all my social tools into one place has been my focus.

    That said – I like the idea here. Though others have brought up good points about security and the like.

    At the end of the day I think its about possibilities and being creative with the tools we have. Its not going to work in every case, but my world it could be great for sharing non secure information and communication. As well as a ‘teaching’ type of thing to get more and more people using and understanding the social web. I work at a tech. Co, but not everyone stays up on current tech. – a lot of people just focus on what we do.

    __
    http://twitter.com/franswaa

  • http://www.twitterthoughts.com Roger

    Great ideas Chris. This menu of items (or something similar) might be integrated into strategies we recommend to clients. But as the other commenters have alluded to, what does FF provide that other apps do not? There is an issue here, that I and others have discussed, related to consolidating social media to a point where standardization provides needed efficiencies. Until such a system comes along (or emerges from the morass of apps presently available – will it be FF?) I think it will be a challenge to justify the ROI of such approaches to business.

  • http://chrisbrogan.com chrisbrogan

    @Ami – my answer, with regards to the training, is that it doesn’t discount my premise, but rather, that training and cultural indoctrination is something else entirely and needs attention. You’re right. Not everyone does all the social good stuff. But should they? Well sure!

    @Saravanan – my point is that you as a business leader instruct your company to make it part of where they gather news. If your company isn’t helping people parse the web, they must not value the web.

    @Chris B- you’re right. Pipes does great stuff. I dare you to walk into a typical non-software business and get them to build their own pipes versus just poking a few buttons. You’re thinking like a tech, not like a business process person. Pipes works great. Friendfeed works prettier. For businesses, do you think they want to learn even the Pipes syntax? I say no.

    Your point about the data sharing is spot on *if* I was recommending that they share their internal data. I was mostly pointing to external sources.

    I think @Chris Heuer makes a good point: maybe I should’ve been more clear to define the extranet, and not just a platform all amorphously.

    Funny, two different comments about clouds. I’ve stopped thinking about that term as much directly. Instead, I’m trying to pluck benefits out of the soup.

    Thanks, everyone for your thinking. I’m appreciating your perspectives.

  • http://chrisbrogan.com chrisbrogan

    @Ami – my answer, with regards to the training, is that it doesn’t discount my premise, but rather, that training and cultural indoctrination is something else entirely and needs attention. You’re right. Not everyone does all the social good stuff. But should they? Well sure!

    @Saravanan – my point is that you as a business leader instruct your company to make it part of where they gather news. If your company isn’t helping people parse the web, they must not value the web.

    @Chris B- you’re right. Pipes does great stuff. I dare you to walk into a typical non-software business and get them to build their own pipes versus just poking a few buttons. You’re thinking like a tech, not like a business process person. Pipes works great. Friendfeed works prettier. For businesses, do you think they want to learn even the Pipes syntax? I say no.

    Your point about the data sharing is spot on *if* I was recommending that they share their internal data. I was mostly pointing to external sources.

    I think @Chris Heuer makes a good point: maybe I should’ve been more clear to define the extranet, and not just a platform all amorphously.

    Funny, two different comments about clouds. I’ve stopped thinking about that term as much directly. Instead, I’m trying to pluck benefits out of the soup.

    Thanks, everyone for your thinking. I’m appreciating your perspectives.

  • http://www.saranx.com Saravanan Sahadevan

    Now I do get what you mean… Sorry I guess I interpreted what you said on the post wrongly.

  • http://www.saranx.com Saravanan Sahadevan

    Now I do get what you mean… Sorry I guess I interpreted what you said on the post wrongly.

  • http://www.journamarketing.com/ David Brazeal

    Funny you should write about this today, Chris. I was just working with FriendFeed last night to pull together a single feed of all the new-media projects I’m working on for my company.

    But I’ve hit a snag. Once those feeds are all in one place (I made them into an “imaginary friend”), what’s the best way to publish that feed elsewhere? I tried using WidgetBox to create a widget, which I could then place on the side of my own blog, or on other sites. But WidgetBox doesn’t seem to recognize RSS on the FriendFeed page. I must be doing something wrong. Any suggestions?

  • http://www.journamarketing.com/ David Brazeal

    Funny you should write about this today, Chris. I was just working with FriendFeed last night to pull together a single feed of all the new-media projects I’m working on for my company.

    But I’ve hit a snag. Once those feeds are all in one place (I made them into an “imaginary friend”), what’s the best way to publish that feed elsewhere? I tried using WidgetBox to create a widget, which I could then place on the side of my own blog, or on other sites. But WidgetBox doesn’t seem to recognize RSS on the FriendFeed page. I must be doing something wrong. Any suggestions?

  • http://www.capturetheconversation.com Jason Cormier

    At Room 214, we spend a great deal of time not only setting up social networking strategies (and accounts) for our clients – but also on reporting on their engagement. For a while, we were relegated to a central collection of spreadsheets we would share within Google Docs as part of our reporting.

    We found that Friendfeed was a quick and simple solution for giving the client a different view into their social media. In summary, I guess you could say we use it purely as a reporting tool.

  • http://www.capturetheconversation.com Jason Cormier

    At Room 214, we spend a great deal of time not only setting up social networking strategies (and accounts) for our clients – but also on reporting on their engagement. For a while, we were relegated to a central collection of spreadsheets we would share within Google Docs as part of our reporting.

    We found that Friendfeed was a quick and simple solution for giving the client a different view into their social media. In summary, I guess you could say we use it purely as a reporting tool.

  • http://www.flow14.com Kyle

    Great idea, Chris!

    @David B., have you tried using FeedBurner to re-publish your FriendFeed?

  • http://www.flow14.com Kyle

    Great idea, Chris!

    @David B., have you tried using FeedBurner to re-publish your FriendFeed?

  • http://www.journamarketing.com/ David Brazeal

    @Kyle No! It didn’t even occur to me. Brilliant idea…I’ll try that!

  • http://www.journamarketing.com/ David Brazeal

    @Kyle No! It didn’t even occur to me. Brilliant idea…I’ll try that!

  • http://www.thebdgway.com Chris Bucchere

    @chrisbrogan Thanks for responding to my comments. I’m glad you’re reading them and responding and not just writing in a vacuum like so many other A-list bloggers.

    I’ll concede the point about Yahoo! Pipes as it certainly is harder to use and not as pretty as FF. I guess if you want power and flexibility, you might have to sacrifice some of the user experience. As a developer, maybe my perspective is skewed, but I think any IT Admin could probably handle setting up a pipe for his or her less technical “knowledge worker” counterpart. But if you want the knowledge worker to set up his or her own aggregator, then FF *is* a better choice.

    However, regarding your comment about internal vs. external sources: if I’m doing competitive intelligence research or anything else of a sensitive nature, I may not want the whole world knowing what I’m consuming online, even if it’s from external sources. This is why I like Google Reader’s “share” feature so much — it keeps me in control of which articles I’m choosing to let others know that I’m reading. I live a highly transparent life online, but even if I’m consuming publicly available content, there are many cases where I don’t want the rest of the world to know what content I’m reading/bookmarking/emailing to others/etc.

  • http://www.thebdgway.com Chris Bucchere

    @chrisbrogan Thanks for responding to my comments. I’m glad you’re reading them and responding and not just writing in a vacuum like so many other A-list bloggers.

    I’ll concede the point about Yahoo! Pipes as it certainly is harder to use and not as pretty as FF. I guess if you want power and flexibility, you might have to sacrifice some of the user experience. As a developer, maybe my perspective is skewed, but I think any IT Admin could probably handle setting up a pipe for his or her less technical “knowledge worker” counterpart. But if you want the knowledge worker to set up his or her own aggregator, then FF *is* a better choice.

    However, regarding your comment about internal vs. external sources: if I’m doing competitive intelligence research or anything else of a sensitive nature, I may not want the whole world knowing what I’m consuming online, even if it’s from external sources. This is why I like Google Reader’s “share” feature so much — it keeps me in control of which articles I’m choosing to let others know that I’m reading. I live a highly transparent life online, but even if I’m consuming publicly available content, there are many cases where I don’t want the rest of the world to know what content I’m reading/bookmarking/emailing to others/etc.

  • http://amichitwood.blogspot.com Ami Chitwood

    @Chris – Yes – my comments about education, training and getting folks to “see the light” and “want the light” are the necessary before social media or collaborative solutions are presented to folks – just wanting to make sure that these components don’t get lost in the “hey this is cool” language we all use when trying something new. I’ve been learning this the hard way and wanted to make sure I shared with others :) Never underestimate the role of education with the change management process and the role the evangelists and early adopters need to play to get others on board the cluetrain. Thanks for generating an interesting discussion per usual.

  • http://amichitwood.blogspot.com Ami Chitwood

    @Chris – Yes – my comments about education, training and getting folks to “see the light” and “want the light” are the necessary before social media or collaborative solutions are presented to folks – just wanting to make sure that these components don’t get lost in the “hey this is cool” language we all use when trying something new. I’ve been learning this the hard way and wanted to make sure I shared with others :) Never underestimate the role of education with the change management process and the role the evangelists and early adopters need to play to get others on board the cluetrain. Thanks for generating an interesting discussion per usual.

  • http://www.jeffreysass.com Jeff Sass

    Totally unrelated to your great post above, a co-worker at Myxer just walked into my office to tell me he had set up a Friendfeed Room to aggregate mobile industry news and other stuff we like to discuss internally. I laughed and asked if he had read your blog post this morning. He said “Who’s Chris Brogan?” LOL. Your impact goes beyond the reach of your readers! Hehe.

  • http://www.jeffreysass.com Jeff Sass

    Totally unrelated to your great post above, a co-worker at Myxer just walked into my office to tell me he had set up a Friendfeed Room to aggregate mobile industry news and other stuff we like to discuss internally. I laughed and asked if he had read your blog post this morning. He said “Who’s Chris Brogan?” LOL. Your impact goes beyond the reach of your readers! Hehe.

  • Patrick Cameron

    Using Yahoo pipes or pulling 30 feeds into FriendFeed is still fairly complex geek stuff. For the rest of the world there is Filtrbox.

    You give them search terms they track mentions across mainstream news, blogs or social media with Twitter and Friendfeed support.

    Give it a shot and see if it works for you filtrbox.com

  • Patrick Cameron

    Using Yahoo pipes or pulling 30 feeds into FriendFeed is still fairly complex geek stuff. For the rest of the world there is Filtrbox.

    You give them search terms they track mentions across mainstream news, blogs or social media with Twitter and Friendfeed support.

    Give it a shot and see if it works for you filtrbox.com

  • Pingback: friendfeed | Chris Brogan (friend of Robert Scoble): How to Use Friendfeed as a Collaborative Business Tool (via Blog)

  • Pingback: Friendfeed for business

  • http://www.backtype.com/alwillis Albert Willis

    FriendFeed is a great general purpose aggregator. I recently showed FF at meeting with a client and she got very excited by what was possible.

  • http://www.backtype.com/alwillis Albert Willis

    FriendFeed is a great general purpose aggregator. I recently showed FF at meeting with a client and she got very excited by what was possible.

  • http://www.larakretler.com Lara Kretler

    Chris, this is so cool. I’ve been using Friendfeed for a while now to aggregate all of my social media output into one convenient place, but it never occurred to me to use it for clients or my agency as well. I’m definitely going to try this out.

    I love finding new business uses for exisiting social media tools. I generally start out using them personally to see how they work, and then try to figure out business applications. You’ve definitely given me a lot to work with here, as usual. Many thanks!

  • http://www.larakretler.com Lara Kretler

    Chris, this is so cool. I’ve been using Friendfeed for a while now to aggregate all of my social media output into one convenient place, but it never occurred to me to use it for clients or my agency as well. I’m definitely going to try this out.

    I love finding new business uses for exisiting social media tools. I generally start out using them personally to see how they work, and then try to figure out business applications. You’ve definitely given me a lot to work with here, as usual. Many thanks!

  • http://www.RealityWealth.com Christopher H.

    I like it, thanks for the great tips.