<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Implications of a Google Social Network</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.chrisbrogan.com/implications-of-a-google-social-network/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.chrisbrogan.com/implications-of-a-google-social-network/</link>
	<description>Learn How Human Business Works - Beyond Social Media</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 14:24:09 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: youtube downloader</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisbrogan.com/implications-of-a-google-social-network/comment-page-1/#comment-287948</link>
		<dc:creator>youtube downloader</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 06 Dec 2010 13:02:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://chrisbrogan.com/implications-of-a-google-social-network/#comment-287948</guid>
		<description>Google having the potential to keep you longer and longer on their court, you’ve got some really prime real estate for advertising, which is how Google’s owned the Internet for the last several years.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Google having the potential to keep you longer and longer on their court, you’ve got some really prime real estate for advertising, which is how Google’s owned the Internet for the last several years.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Buz</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisbrogan.com/implications-of-a-google-social-network/comment-page-1/#comment-226682</link>
		<dc:creator>Buz</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 23 Aug 2010 14:56:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://chrisbrogan.com/implications-of-a-google-social-network/#comment-226682</guid>
		<description>thanks</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>thanks</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Blogger Outreach, in Plain English (and Other PR Blog Jots) &#171; Media Bullseye &#8211; A New Media and Communications Magazine</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisbrogan.com/implications-of-a-google-social-network/comment-page-1/#comment-216726</link>
		<dc:creator>Blogger Outreach, in Plain English (and Other PR Blog Jots) &#171; Media Bullseye &#8211; A New Media and Communications Magazine</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 13 Jul 2010 19:35:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://chrisbrogan.com/implications-of-a-google-social-network/#comment-216726</guid>
		<description>[...] Stealth Social Network Chris Brogan I officially admit that I’ve been linking to Chris Brogan too much lately, but his “100 Posts” series has been yielding such great fruit I’ve been unable to help myself. Perhaps I will place an official Brogan embargo on the rest of this week—right after today’s Jots. Today he points out the clever nature of what appears to be a new social networking platform from Google. They’ve been slowly adding features to their various popular applications, all of which just might add up to a social network you’re already automatically using, and some potential competition for the closed garden of Facebook. “When Facebook started to make a difference over 2007, and people started hiding inside the very closed walls, Google came up with this, a way to do a lot of the same social features without making us dig up our Orkut account IDs.  In fact, think about it, your social network is your contact list. No invitations necessary. That’s the coup de grace. You’re already bought in, at least insofar as Google can help you convert your friends to your new social network: your inbox.” [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Stealth Social Network Chris Brogan I officially admit that I’ve been linking to Chris Brogan too much lately, but his “100 Posts” series has been yielding such great fruit I’ve been unable to help myself. Perhaps I will place an official Brogan embargo on the rest of this week—right after today’s Jots. Today he points out the clever nature of what appears to be a new social networking platform from Google. They’ve been slowly adding features to their various popular applications, all of which just might add up to a social network you’re already automatically using, and some potential competition for the closed garden of Facebook. “When Facebook started to make a difference over 2007, and people started hiding inside the very closed walls, Google came up with this, a way to do a lot of the same social features without making us dig up our Orkut account IDs.  In fact, think about it, your social network is your contact list. No invitations necessary. That’s the coup de grace. You’re already bought in, at least insofar as Google can help you convert your friends to your new social network: your inbox.” [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Media Bullseye</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisbrogan.com/implications-of-a-google-social-network/comment-page-1/#comment-95928</link>
		<dc:creator>Media Bullseye</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 17 Dec 2007 21:35:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://chrisbrogan.com/implications-of-a-google-social-network/#comment-95928</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;Blogger Outreach, in Plain English (and Other PR Blog Jots)...&lt;/strong&gt;

Jeremiah Owyang offers some common sense advice to startups conducting their own blogger outreach; Geoff Livingston gives a good summary of a surprising new online privacy study, and Chris Brogan wonders about Google entering the social networking fray...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Blogger Outreach, in Plain English (and Other PR Blog Jots)&#8230;</strong></p>
<p>Jeremiah Owyang offers some common sense advice to startups conducting their own blogger outreach; Geoff Livingston gives a good summary of a surprising new online privacy study, and Chris Brogan wonders about Google entering the social networking fray&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: David Kowarsky</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisbrogan.com/implications-of-a-google-social-network/comment-page-1/#comment-95738</link>
		<dc:creator>David Kowarsky</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 17 Dec 2007 07:01:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://chrisbrogan.com/implications-of-a-google-social-network/#comment-95738</guid>
		<description>&lt;i&gt;your social network is your contact list. No invitations necessary...You&#039;re already bought in... &lt;/i&gt;

Don&#039;t we, uh, NOT like it when social networks automatically decide to include/exclude people who we happen to be in touch with but may not want to share everything with?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>your social network is your contact list. No invitations necessary&#8230;You&#8217;re already bought in&#8230; </i></p>
<p>Don&#8217;t we, uh, NOT like it when social networks automatically decide to include/exclude people who we happen to be in touch with but may not want to share everything with?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: David Kowarsky</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisbrogan.com/implications-of-a-google-social-network/comment-page-1/#comment-240197</link>
		<dc:creator>David Kowarsky</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 17 Dec 2007 07:01:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://chrisbrogan.com/implications-of-a-google-social-network/#comment-240197</guid>
		<description>&lt;i&gt;your social network is your contact list. No invitations necessary...You&#039;re already bought in... &lt;/i&gt;

Don&#039;t we, uh, NOT like it when social networks automatically decide to include/exclude people who we happen to be in touch with but may not want to share everything with?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>your social network is your contact list. No invitations necessary&#8230;You&#8217;re already bought in&#8230; </i></p>
<p>Don&#8217;t we, uh, NOT like it when social networks automatically decide to include/exclude people who we happen to be in touch with but may not want to share everything with?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: David Kowarsky</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisbrogan.com/implications-of-a-google-social-network/comment-page-1/#comment-240198</link>
		<dc:creator>David Kowarsky</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 17 Dec 2007 07:01:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://chrisbrogan.com/implications-of-a-google-social-network/#comment-240198</guid>
		<description>&lt;i&gt;your social network is your contact list. No invitations necessary...You&#039;re already bought in... &lt;/i&gt;

Don&#039;t we, uh, NOT like it when social networks automatically decide to include/exclude people who we happen to be in touch with but may not want to share everything with?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>your social network is your contact list. No invitations necessary&#8230;You&#8217;re already bought in&#8230; </i></p>
<p>Don&#8217;t we, uh, NOT like it when social networks automatically decide to include/exclude people who we happen to be in touch with but may not want to share everything with?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Douglas E. Welch</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisbrogan.com/implications-of-a-google-social-network/comment-page-1/#comment-95723</link>
		<dc:creator>Douglas E. Welch</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 17 Dec 2007 05:31:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://chrisbrogan.com/implications-of-a-google-social-network/#comment-95723</guid>
		<description>Interesting idea, and most likely possible, but we  must all be careful to avoid trading one monopoly for another. More and more, I am leaning towards a decentralized connection of parts rather than a monolithic whole. Distributing the power allows for a larger selection of alternatives and avoids the &quot;winner take all&quot; model where users can only choose between&quot;A&quot; and &quot;A&quot;.

Douglas</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Interesting idea, and most likely possible, but we  must all be careful to avoid trading one monopoly for another. More and more, I am leaning towards a decentralized connection of parts rather than a monolithic whole. Distributing the power allows for a larger selection of alternatives and avoids the &#8220;winner take all&#8221; model where users can only choose between&#8221;A&#8221; and &#8220;A&#8221;.</p>
<p>Douglas</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Douglas E. Welch</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisbrogan.com/implications-of-a-google-social-network/comment-page-1/#comment-240195</link>
		<dc:creator>Douglas E. Welch</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 17 Dec 2007 05:31:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://chrisbrogan.com/implications-of-a-google-social-network/#comment-240195</guid>
		<description>Interesting idea, and most likely possible, but we  must all be careful to avoid trading one monopoly for another. More and more, I am leaning towards a decentralized connection of parts rather than a monolithic whole. Distributing the power allows for a larger selection of alternatives and avoids the &quot;winner take all&quot; model where users can only choose between&quot;A&quot; and &quot;A&quot;.

Douglas</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Interesting idea, and most likely possible, but we  must all be careful to avoid trading one monopoly for another. More and more, I am leaning towards a decentralized connection of parts rather than a monolithic whole. Distributing the power allows for a larger selection of alternatives and avoids the &#8220;winner take all&#8221; model where users can only choose between&#8221;A&#8221; and &#8220;A&#8221;.</p>
<p>Douglas</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Douglas E. Welch</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisbrogan.com/implications-of-a-google-social-network/comment-page-1/#comment-240196</link>
		<dc:creator>Douglas E. Welch</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 17 Dec 2007 05:31:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://chrisbrogan.com/implications-of-a-google-social-network/#comment-240196</guid>
		<description>Interesting idea, and most likely possible, but we  must all be careful to avoid trading one monopoly for another. More and more, I am leaning towards a decentralized connection of parts rather than a monolithic whole. Distributing the power allows for a larger selection of alternatives and avoids the &quot;winner take all&quot; model where users can only choose between&quot;A&quot; and &quot;A&quot;.

Douglas</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Interesting idea, and most likely possible, but we  must all be careful to avoid trading one monopoly for another. More and more, I am leaning towards a decentralized connection of parts rather than a monolithic whole. Distributing the power allows for a larger selection of alternatives and avoids the &#8220;winner take all&#8221; model where users can only choose between&#8221;A&#8221; and &#8220;A&#8221;.</p>
<p>Douglas</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

