Media Makers Need to Climb the Value Chain

Value If you’re CNN, should you pay camera operators $55,000 a year (with benefits, make it about $80K), or should you encourage the crowd to become part of the I-Report team? Can’t my editors and my “house” staff make up for the shaky cameraphone videos because of the INSTANT feel of being there? What if I fired 30 percent of my field camera team? I could replace them with 3 or 4 editors and someone to field all the cameraphone videos I received. Right?

I’m concerned that lots of us are hunting on the wrong end of the value proposition by confusing HOW to make media with WHAT to do with it.

The Value Chain

With all respect to professional camera crew (of which, I count this guy a friend), sometimes you need a pro, and other times, you need the shot. Look at some of the most famous footage in the WORLD: Rodney King’s beating, JFK’s assassination, Saddam’s hanging. It didn’t matter that it wasn’t pro; it mattered that we were THERE, that we SAW. Wired talked about the value chain shift in their The Rise of Crowdsourcing article.

To that end, where’s the value? The value goes upstream to the editing, to the assembling of cohesive pieces, to the “home” team that puts together the news and distributes it out. The value goes in the relationships that professional journalists have built with their typical constituents so that they can preserve the professional conversations, the dance. (Nothing wrong with that dance. It’s how we currently have access to some of our news).

So if cost goes down on producing media, what are all us schmucks who videoblog going to do to create larger value?

The New Storytellers

Story, be it news or entertainment, is still the key. A bunch of choppy video is never just thrown up there. We put story around it. We tell the context. We build by connecting it to other things. Storytelling, not story-shooting, will be the key to the value. It’s how you say it, how you package it, how fast you get it to the world, how you share it, and how inclusive you make your product.

Go after the stories, not the cameras. Turn your audience into community, not numbers for an ad revenue deal. Empower your community to build your story, not watch.

Game Theory

There’s a reason the videogame industry is chewing deeply into other entertainment spending. It’s because people drive videogames. It’s a lean-forward experience, where you are the hero, and you are the story in motion. That’s not the camera operator. It’s the storyteller in action.

Want even more inclusion? Multiplayer games like World of Warcraft and XBOX Live and all these new contenders are breaking open the experience for collaborative storytelling on a scale that just keeps growing in complexity and with a greater return-on-time-and-value than most any other experience.

Don’t Defend, Consider and Plan

Don’t reply with how your show is different, or how your show is inclusive. Instead, consider what you’re going to do in a year, where there’s a thousand Justin.tv shows, five hundred tech news video shows, 1,000 “all about me” videoblogs. How will you draw a relevant community to your message, and how will you be compensated for what you’re doing?

We’re in the Blue Shirt new media revolution, where the difference between the top videoblogs and podcasts and a Best Buy employee are the fact we’re trying something new and the Best Buy employee is making money for what he does.

How will you bring your passion for media to the next level? AND if you’re not someone with a media product (blog, Internet TV show, podcast, whatever), what do YOU need as an audience to stop watching Sopranos and Heroes and American Idol and start watching more Scriggity and Galacticast? What do you want out of your new media?

ChrisBrogan.com runs on the Genesis Framework

Genesis Theme Framework

The Genesis Framework empowers you to quickly and easily build incredible websites with WordPress. Whether you're a novice or advanced developer, Genesis provides you with the secure and search-engine-optimized foundation that takes WordPress to places you never thought it could go.

With automatic theme updates and world-class support included, Genesis is the smart choice for your WordPress website or blog.

Become a StudioPress Affiliate

  • http://stevegarfield.com steve garfield

    The answer that we are all giving is that we need to do more than watch, we need to be included. Dave Weinberger calls it ‘ours.” It’s not media being broadcast at us, it’s us being involved in the broadcast in some way.

    In the blog world where 1% of the people create and around 9% contribute, what does that mean for the other 90%?

    That answer is the flavor of the month, but I’m getting uncomfortable giving it. There’s something else going on right now. It’s like a new wave of creativity. I’ll be interested to see where it leads…

  • http://stevegarfield.com steve garfield

    The answer that we are all giving is that we need to do more than watch, we need to be included. Dave Weinberger calls it ‘ours.” It’s not media being broadcast at us, it’s us being involved in the broadcast in some way.

    In the blog world where 1% of the people create and around 9% contribute, what does that mean for the other 90%?

    That answer is the flavor of the month, but I’m getting uncomfortable giving it. There’s something else going on right now. It’s like a new wave of creativity. I’ll be interested to see where it leads…

  • http://justinkownacki.blogspot.com Justin Kownacki

    So what you’re saying is: we need to start acting like we’re worth something?

    Isn’t growing a spine the antithesis to new media creation?

  • http://justinkownacki.blogspot.com Justin Kownacki

    So what you’re saying is: we need to start acting like we’re worth something?

    Isn’t growing a spine the antithesis to new media creation?

  • http://stevegarfield.com steve garfield

    The answer that we are all giving is that we need to do more than watch, we need to be included. Dave Weinberger calls it ‘ours.” It’s not media being broadcast at us, it’s us being involved in the broadcast in some way.

    In the blog world where 1% of the people create and around 9% contribute, what does that mean for the other 90%?

    That answer is the flavor of the month, but I’m getting uncomfortable giving it. There’s something else going on right now. It’s like a new wave of creativity. I’ll be interested to see where it leads…

  • http://justinkownacki.blogspot.com Justin Kownacki

    So what you’re saying is: we need to start acting like we’re worth something?

    Isn’t growing a spine the antithesis to new media creation?

  • http://www.chrisbrogan.com chrisbrogan

    It’s not even growing a spine. How do you go to FOX and claim your place at the table? Or do you even GO to FOX? Who DO you go to? Where are the islands for this new experience?

    Just shooting video isn’t going to be all that relevant in 8 or 10 months. Is it relevant now?

    If we don’t move now, we might drown quickly. But what’s the move?

  • http://www.chrisbrogan.com chrisbrogan

    It’s not even growing a spine. How do you go to FOX and claim your place at the table? Or do you even GO to FOX? Who DO you go to? Where are the islands for this new experience?

    Just shooting video isn’t going to be all that relevant in 8 or 10 months. Is it relevant now?

    If we don’t move now, we might drown quickly. But what’s the move?

  • http://www.mobasoft.com Michael Bailey

    I do have the answer to this question.
    This is one which I am not going to be giving away.

    I have Web 3.0 within the confines of my brain.
    I am already in the process of making it a reality, and providing people with real “day jobs” at the same time, doing what they already love to do.

    More details as I find that I can release them

  • http://www.mobasoft.com Michael Bailey

    I do have the answer to this question.
    This is one which I am not going to be giving away.

    I have Web 3.0 within the confines of my brain.
    I am already in the process of making it a reality, and providing people with real “day jobs” at the same time, doing what they already love to do.

    More details as I find that I can release them

  • http://www.strengthradio.com Jason White

    What an excellent thought….which is it the quality or the immediacy? I think that as we go forward video as a new form of communication will get folded into the requirements to play in any given game.

    Now I think more than ever people want a more immersive experience, it isn’t just enough to visit your website or watch your video blog, I also want to read what you have written or see what you recommend. I want to listen to your interviews and comment on your comments.

    So, I think that the more people want to involve themselves in a new media experience the more they will be creating a wider footprint or a more visible presence.

    Sopranos? Does anyone really watch that show any more? It’s a nighttime soap opera about A-holes…

  • http://www.strengthradio.com Jason White

    What an excellent thought….which is it the quality or the immediacy? I think that as we go forward video as a new form of communication will get folded into the requirements to play in any given game.

    Now I think more than ever people want a more immersive experience, it isn’t just enough to visit your website or watch your video blog, I also want to read what you have written or see what you recommend. I want to listen to your interviews and comment on your comments.

    So, I think that the more people want to involve themselves in a new media experience the more they will be creating a wider footprint or a more visible presence.

    Sopranos? Does anyone really watch that show any more? It’s a nighttime soap opera about A-holes…

  • http://www.strengthradio.com Jason White

    What an excellent thought….which is it the quality or the immediacy? I think that as we go forward video as a new form of communication will get folded into the requirements to play in any given game.

    Now I think more than ever people want a more immersive experience, it isn’t just enough to visit your website or watch your video blog, I also want to read what you have written or see what you recommend. I want to listen to your interviews and comment on your comments.

    So, I think that the more people want to involve themselves in a new media experience the more they will be creating a wider footprint or a more visible presence.

    Sopranos? Does anyone really watch that show any more? It’s a nighttime soap opera about A-holes…

  • http://www.christopherspenn.com Christopher S. Penn

    Well, if you’re talking media value, what has value?

    Content has value to audience.
    Audience has value to revenue drivers.

    In order to move up the value chain, you need to continue to provide ever-improving value. Make better, more timely, more relevant, more engaging content (and have your audience help) and derive revenue from an ever increasing, ever more focused audience niche.

  • http://www.christopherspenn.com Christopher S. Penn

    Well, if you’re talking media value, what has value?

    Content has value to audience.
    Audience has value to revenue drivers.

    In order to move up the value chain, you need to continue to provide ever-improving value. Make better, more timely, more relevant, more engaging content (and have your audience help) and derive revenue from an ever increasing, ever more focused audience niche.

  • http://www.christopherspenn.com Christopher S. Penn

    Well, if you’re talking media value, what has value?

    Content has value to audience.
    Audience has value to revenue drivers.

    In order to move up the value chain, you need to continue to provide ever-improving value. Make better, more timely, more relevant, more engaging content (and have your audience help) and derive revenue from an ever increasing, ever more focused audience niche.

  • http://pravdam.wordpress.com Kfir Pravda

    The truth needs to be told – the content out there today is good, but it is going to take a lot of time to get to mainstream. first we need to create content that is relevant to people outside the social media walls – go to non 2.0 people and get them interested. This can be done if we will find subject matters that are not only gadgets, talking heads, personal opinions and such. Drama, magazines, news from a different angle – these are the things that can draw more attention to our work. Second, we need to push content EVERYWHERE. i don’t care about Blip or Youtube – i want to be everywhere. Third, we need to embrace AppleTV and media centers, and try to push our content there. and fourth – i am looking all the time at topics that someone else have created the market already. meaning, if there are a lot of travelers, then i can find them in specific sites that someone else marketed. so i will just piggy back on his marketing $$$ and create a show for travelers, and create some kind of cooperation with these sites.
    we are the new media creators, that in years to come shape the industry. we should start looking at ourselves as such.

  • http://pravdam.wordpress.com Kfir Pravda

    The truth needs to be told – the content out there today is good, but it is going to take a lot of time to get to mainstream. first we need to create content that is relevant to people outside the social media walls – go to non 2.0 people and get them interested. This can be done if we will find subject matters that are not only gadgets, talking heads, personal opinions and such. Drama, magazines, news from a different angle – these are the things that can draw more attention to our work. Second, we need to push content EVERYWHERE. i don’t care about Blip or Youtube – i want to be everywhere. Third, we need to embrace AppleTV and media centers, and try to push our content there. and fourth – i am looking all the time at topics that someone else have created the market already. meaning, if there are a lot of travelers, then i can find them in specific sites that someone else marketed. so i will just piggy back on his marketing $$$ and create a show for travelers, and create some kind of cooperation with these sites.
    we are the new media creators, that in years to come shape the industry. we should start looking at ourselves as such.

  • http://pravdam.wordpress.com Kfir Pravda

    The truth needs to be told – the content out there today is good, but it is going to take a lot of time to get to mainstream. first we need to create content that is relevant to people outside the social media walls – go to non 2.0 people and get them interested. This can be done if we will find subject matters that are not only gadgets, talking heads, personal opinions and such. Drama, magazines, news from a different angle – these are the things that can draw more attention to our work. Second, we need to push content EVERYWHERE. i don’t care about Blip or Youtube – i want to be everywhere. Third, we need to embrace AppleTV and media centers, and try to push our content there. and fourth – i am looking all the time at topics that someone else have created the market already. meaning, if there are a lot of travelers, then i can find them in specific sites that someone else marketed. so i will just piggy back on his marketing $$$ and create a show for travelers, and create some kind of cooperation with these sites.
    we are the new media creators, that in years to come shape the industry. we should start looking at ourselves as such.

  • http://www.chrisbrogan.com chrisbrogan

    Kfir reminds me of something: I just went to see Mark Wahlberg in SHOOTER. I’m thinking that no matter how much time and passion he put into it, Justin can’t make SHOOTER for me. I watched THE PRESTIGE last night. Steve Garfield can’t shoot that for me.

    So there’s still something out there about reaching the mainstream. And then, there’s some of us digging into the niche. I’m in the niche. But SOMEONE from us has to go after the mainstream.

  • http://www.chrisbrogan.com chrisbrogan

    Kfir reminds me of something: I just went to see Mark Wahlberg in SHOOTER. I’m thinking that no matter how much time and passion he put into it, Justin can’t make SHOOTER for me. I watched THE PRESTIGE last night. Steve Garfield can’t shoot that for me.

    So there’s still something out there about reaching the mainstream. And then, there’s some of us digging into the niche. I’m in the niche. But SOMEONE from us has to go after the mainstream.

  • http://www.chrisbrogan.com chrisbrogan

    Kfir reminds me of something: I just went to see Mark Wahlberg in SHOOTER. I’m thinking that no matter how much time and passion he put into it, Justin can’t make SHOOTER for me. I watched THE PRESTIGE last night. Steve Garfield can’t shoot that for me.

    So there’s still something out there about reaching the mainstream. And then, there’s some of us digging into the niche. I’m in the niche. But SOMEONE from us has to go after the mainstream.

  • http://www.mobasoft.com Michael Bailey

    Update to my previous comment.

    No, it’s nothing which I’ve told anyone about yet.
    It does incorporate some things which some of you may already know about, but the final product/approach I have not disclosed.

  • http://www.mobasoft.com Michael Bailey

    Update to my previous comment.

    No, it’s nothing which I’ve told anyone about yet.
    It does incorporate some things which some of you may already know about, but the final product/approach I have not disclosed.

  • http://www.mobasoft.com Michael Bailey

    Update to my previous comment.

    No, it’s nothing which I’ve told anyone about yet.
    It does incorporate some things which some of you may already know about, but the final product/approach I have not disclosed.

  • http://schlomolog.blogspot.com Schlomo Rabinowitz

    There are definitely folks who are trying to be a part — or can be a part if they tried — of the mainstream.

    Ask A Ninja is an obvious one. JetSet, I believe, can easily transition into the mainstream (while still creating constructs that are forward-thinking; that incorporates niche web world with standard television).

    Then there’s the whole discussion of folks like Tom Green, where the mainstream spit him off the networks, yet is quite popular on the internet.

  • http://schlomolog.blogspot.com Schlomo Rabinowitz

    There are definitely folks who are trying to be a part — or can be a part if they tried — of the mainstream.

    Ask A Ninja is an obvious one. JetSet, I believe, can easily transition into the mainstream (while still creating constructs that are forward-thinking; that incorporates niche web world with standard television).

    Then there’s the whole discussion of folks like Tom Green, where the mainstream spit him off the networks, yet is quite popular on the internet.

  • http://www.chrisbrogan.com chrisbrogan

    I’m a card carrying fan of both shows, and also Tom Green. Some really good examples.

    Question that relates:

    How many “shows” out there today are really segments waiting for better packaging?

  • http://www.chrisbrogan.com chrisbrogan

    I’m a card carrying fan of both shows, and also Tom Green. Some really good examples.

    Question that relates:

    How many “shows” out there today are really segments waiting for better packaging?

  • http://www.chrisbrogan.com chrisbrogan

    I’m a card carrying fan of both shows, and also Tom Green. Some really good examples.

    Question that relates:

    How many “shows” out there today are really segments waiting for better packaging?

  • http://pravdam.wordpress.com Kfir Pravda

    I think we need to differentiate between two separate things when we discuss quality: production quality and show quality. production quality is the image, sound, effects etc. and guys, lets face it – when you get paid and have top notch equipment and 3 cameras, you can have a higher level of production than working out of the basement with one camera. Yes, it is changing, great cameras are affordable,etc, but still there is a difference.
    The second type of quality is what i call show quality – is it a good show? we all remember the first final fantasy movie. these guys spent tons of money on a 3D animation feature. it had an amazing production quality. but it was a shitty movie – cause it was boring, with stupid script. Here i think we can beat the big guys. we can create high show quality with one camera. it is possible. but in order to do that we need to look at ourselves as leaders of a new movement that will change the industry. this way we will force ourselves to look at things from a pure media organization perspective, create quality content, beat the big guys with creativity. when i talk to people about this market, people are talking about success stories all the time. The success stories i hear are of people that started their vlog and moved to NBC. this is not a success story. a success story is when we have shows that make money on their own, gain wide distribution, and become a player. there is a reason why so many indie movies are not successful – not everyone want to see the boy meet girl (or boy meet boy) movie backward in black and white cause it is cool. people want good content. and we can give it to them.
    wow – that was long. Chris – you just gave me a gazilions posts to my blog :)

  • http://pravdam.wordpress.com Kfir Pravda

    I think we need to differentiate between two separate things when we discuss quality: production quality and show quality. production quality is the image, sound, effects etc. and guys, lets face it – when you get paid and have top notch equipment and 3 cameras, you can have a higher level of production than working out of the basement with one camera. Yes, it is changing, great cameras are affordable,etc, but still there is a difference.
    The second type of quality is what i call show quality – is it a good show? we all remember the first final fantasy movie. these guys spent tons of money on a 3D animation feature. it had an amazing production quality. but it was a shitty movie – cause it was boring, with stupid script. Here i think we can beat the big guys. we can create high show quality with one camera. it is possible. but in order to do that we need to look at ourselves as leaders of a new movement that will change the industry. this way we will force ourselves to look at things from a pure media organization perspective, create quality content, beat the big guys with creativity. when i talk to people about this market, people are talking about success stories all the time. The success stories i hear are of people that started their vlog and moved to NBC. this is not a success story. a success story is when we have shows that make money on their own, gain wide distribution, and become a player. there is a reason why so many indie movies are not successful – not everyone want to see the boy meet girl (or boy meet boy) movie backward in black and white cause it is cool. people want good content. and we can give it to them.
    wow – that was long. Chris – you just gave me a gazilions posts to my blog :)

  • http://pravdam.wordpress.com Kfir Pravda

    I think we need to differentiate between two separate things when we discuss quality: production quality and show quality. production quality is the image, sound, effects etc. and guys, lets face it – when you get paid and have top notch equipment and 3 cameras, you can have a higher level of production than working out of the basement with one camera. Yes, it is changing, great cameras are affordable,etc, but still there is a difference.
    The second type of quality is what i call show quality – is it a good show? we all remember the first final fantasy movie. these guys spent tons of money on a 3D animation feature. it had an amazing production quality. but it was a shitty movie – cause it was boring, with stupid script. Here i think we can beat the big guys. we can create high show quality with one camera. it is possible. but in order to do that we need to look at ourselves as leaders of a new movement that will change the industry. this way we will force ourselves to look at things from a pure media organization perspective, create quality content, beat the big guys with creativity. when i talk to people about this market, people are talking about success stories all the time. The success stories i hear are of people that started their vlog and moved to NBC. this is not a success story. a success story is when we have shows that make money on their own, gain wide distribution, and become a player. there is a reason why so many indie movies are not successful – not everyone want to see the boy meet girl (or boy meet boy) movie backward in black and white cause it is cool. people want good content. and we can give it to them.
    wow – that was long. Chris – you just gave me a gazilions posts to my blog :)

  • http://banannie.com/blog annie

    Audience member here (for now anyway) chiming in. I’ve already pretty much dumped radio in favor of audio podcasts. I’m not quite ready to dump MSM tv and films, but I do spend more and more time watching podcasts and other youtube-ish stuff. But yeah, there’s a lot of crap to wade through. Storytelling is most important, there has to be a point. So is visual prettiness, I used to edit video and I really appreciate it when a podcaster takes advantage of post-production.

    You’re right, it’s not about just shooting video. It’s about talent & effort, and the ones who have talent and put in effort will break through, I don’t think they have to necessarily seek it out.

  • http://banannie.com/blog annie

    Audience member here (for now anyway) chiming in. I’ve already pretty much dumped radio in favor of audio podcasts. I’m not quite ready to dump MSM tv and films, but I do spend more and more time watching podcasts and other youtube-ish stuff. But yeah, there’s a lot of crap to wade through. Storytelling is most important, there has to be a point. So is visual prettiness, I used to edit video and I really appreciate it when a podcaster takes advantage of post-production.

    You’re right, it’s not about just shooting video. It’s about talent & effort, and the ones who have talent and put in effort will break through, I don’t think they have to necessarily seek it out.

  • http://www.g14productions.com g14productions

    You know Chris, we could make Shooter for you.

    …now…we just might.

    Matthew

  • http://www.g14productions.com g14productions

    You know Chris, we could make Shooter for you.

    …now…we just might.

    Matthew

  • http://banannie.com/blog annie

    Audience member here (for now anyway) chiming in. I’ve already pretty much dumped radio in favor of audio podcasts. I’m not quite ready to dump MSM tv and films, but I do spend more and more time watching podcasts and other youtube-ish stuff. But yeah, there’s a lot of crap to wade through. Storytelling is most important, there has to be a point. So is visual prettiness, I used to edit video and I really appreciate it when a podcaster takes advantage of post-production.

    You’re right, it’s not about just shooting video. It’s about talent & effort, and the ones who have talent and put in effort will break through, I don’t think they have to necessarily seek it out.

  • http://www.g14productions.com g14productions

    You know Chris, we could make Shooter for you.

    …now…we just might.

    Matthew

  • http://spaceygreview.blogspot.com/ SpaceyG

    Frankly Chris, I hang it ALL up, the camera, the producing, the (bad) editing, the messin’ around with live shit, the blogging, the writing, the meetings, the yadayadayada, the podcasting, the general shuckin’ and jivin’, just to see Adriana resurected for one more episode.

  • http://spaceygreview.blogspot.com/ SpaceyG

    Frankly Chris, I hang it ALL up, the camera, the producing, the (bad) editing, the messin’ around with live shit, the blogging, the writing, the meetings, the yadayadayada, the podcasting, the general shuckin’ and jivin’, just to see Adriana resurected for one more episode.

  • http://spaceygreview.blogspot.com/ SpaceyG

    Frankly Chris, I hang it ALL up, the camera, the producing, the (bad) editing, the messin’ around with live shit, the blogging, the writing, the meetings, the yadayadayada, the podcasting, the general shuckin’ and jivin’, just to see Adriana resurected for one more episode.

  • http://www.ldpodcast.com Whitney

    I read this and I thought about my friends at Pixar. What makes Pixar different from Dreamworks is not the animation, but the storytelling and attention to detail. It may be a story about cars or bugs, but at the heart of it, there is a universal theme, well told. Fishtale is not Finding Nemo, Antz is not Bug’s Life, Flushed Away is not going to be Ratatouille. Disney movies work because the story is the center- animation is just another way to tell the story. You could almost as easily tell it live action as well, but animation works. (How else can you translate The Lion King into a Broadway production if it isn’t really about the story?)
    The problem is that we are getting lazy about story telling. Reality television is telling stories of one sort or another through editing, but it isn’t really crafting stories from the beginning- it’s editing to stereotypes.
    I was almost shocked at how good If Not Now is, produced by Kathryn Jones- the questions asked are poignant, and the front and back bumpers tie the show together well, but still leave you pondering the question at hand.
    And, at the heart of it, people want interactivity. We are tired of being lied to and pandered to, and now that we can exercise control over our channels of entertainment as never before, we are eager to do so. (It’s amazing how impatient I get with regular tv now, after a steady diet of internet TV, podcasts and NPR.) People love talk radio because it’s interactive; people love video games and the Wii because they are interactive; we love watching other people because it’s interactive. Just another form of broadcasting on a smaller format will nto get it done.

  • http://www.ldpodcast.com Whitney

    I read this and I thought about my friends at Pixar. What makes Pixar different from Dreamworks is not the animation, but the storytelling and attention to detail. It may be a story about cars or bugs, but at the heart of it, there is a universal theme, well told. Fishtale is not Finding Nemo, Antz is not Bug’s Life, Flushed Away is not going to be Ratatouille. Disney movies work because the story is the center- animation is just another way to tell the story. You could almost as easily tell it live action as well, but animation works. (How else can you translate The Lion King into a Broadway production if it isn’t really about the story?)
    The problem is that we are getting lazy about story telling. Reality television is telling stories of one sort or another through editing, but it isn’t really crafting stories from the beginning- it’s editing to stereotypes.
    I was almost shocked at how good If Not Now is, produced by Kathryn Jones- the questions asked are poignant, and the front and back bumpers tie the show together well, but still leave you pondering the question at hand.
    And, at the heart of it, people want interactivity. We are tired of being lied to and pandered to, and now that we can exercise control over our channels of entertainment as never before, we are eager to do so. (It’s amazing how impatient I get with regular tv now, after a steady diet of internet TV, podcasts and NPR.) People love talk radio because it’s interactive; people love video games and the Wii because they are interactive; we love watching other people because it’s interactive. Just another form of broadcasting on a smaller format will nto get it done.

  • http://www.ldpodcast.com Whitney

    I read this and I thought about my friends at Pixar. What makes Pixar different from Dreamworks is not the animation, but the storytelling and attention to detail. It may be a story about cars or bugs, but at the heart of it, there is a universal theme, well told. Fishtale is not Finding Nemo, Antz is not Bug’s Life, Flushed Away is not going to be Ratatouille. Disney movies work because the story is the center- animation is just another way to tell the story. You could almost as easily tell it live action as well, but animation works. (How else can you translate The Lion King into a Broadway production if it isn’t really about the story?)
    The problem is that we are getting lazy about story telling. Reality television is telling stories of one sort or another through editing, but it isn’t really crafting stories from the beginning- it’s editing to stereotypes.
    I was almost shocked at how good If Not Now is, produced by Kathryn Jones- the questions asked are poignant, and the front and back bumpers tie the show together well, but still leave you pondering the question at hand.
    And, at the heart of it, people want interactivity. We are tired of being lied to and pandered to, and now that we can exercise control over our channels of entertainment as never before, we are eager to do so. (It’s amazing how impatient I get with regular tv now, after a steady diet of internet TV, podcasts and NPR.) People love talk radio because it’s interactive; people love video games and the Wii because they are interactive; we love watching other people because it’s interactive. Just another form of broadcasting on a smaller format will nto get it done.

  • http://www.chrisbrogan.com chrisbrogan

    Best quote from Whitney’s comment: “How else can you translate The Lion King into a Broadway production if it isn’t really about the story?”

  • http://www.chrisbrogan.com chrisbrogan

    Best quote from Whitney’s comment: “How else can you translate The Lion King into a Broadway production if it isn’t really about the story?”

  • http://www.chrisbrogan.com chrisbrogan

    Best quote from Whitney’s comment: “How else can you translate The Lion King into a Broadway production if it isn’t really about the story?”

  • http://www.g14productions.com g14productions

    My serious thought: Tell great stories. As best you can with the equipment available to you. One way or another, you’ll have an audience. And to me, that’s the real success. You get to tell your story.

    My question: Is there a compelling reason to try and go mainstream? It seems to me like the most compelling reason is a monetary one. And if you are doing it for the money, and that’s why you’re interested in getting into that land, well, maybe you should take a serious look at why you’re creating content. Because there are much easier ways to break into the mainstream than trying to become a big fish in the small new media pond.

    Matthew

  • http://www.g14productions.com g14productions

    My serious thought: Tell great stories. As best you can with the equipment available to you. One way or another, you’ll have an audience. And to me, that’s the real success. You get to tell your story.

    My question: Is there a compelling reason to try and go mainstream? It seems to me like the most compelling reason is a monetary one. And if you are doing it for the money, and that’s why you’re interested in getting into that land, well, maybe you should take a serious look at why you’re creating content. Because there are much easier ways to break into the mainstream than trying to become a big fish in the small new media pond.

    Matthew

GetSocial