<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Planning for 2007</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.chrisbrogan.com/planning-for-2007/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.chrisbrogan.com/planning-for-2007/</link>
	<description>Learn How Human Business Works - Beyond Social Media</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 11:50:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Wallace</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisbrogan.com/planning-for-2007/comment-page-1/#comment-41785</link>
		<dc:creator>Wallace</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 16 Jun 2007 13:28:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://grasshopperfactory.com/cbc/planning-for-2007/#comment-41785</guid>
		<description>This is a wonderful page for everyone! Visit my sites, please:</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is a wonderful page for everyone! Visit my sites, please:</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Wallace</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisbrogan.com/planning-for-2007/comment-page-1/#comment-233080</link>
		<dc:creator>Wallace</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 16 Jun 2007 13:28:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://grasshopperfactory.com/cbc/planning-for-2007/#comment-233080</guid>
		<description>This is a wonderful page for everyone! Visit my sites, please:</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is a wonderful page for everyone! Visit my sites, please:</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: valtrex</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisbrogan.com/planning-for-2007/comment-page-1/#comment-20320</link>
		<dc:creator>valtrex</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 08 Apr 2007 14:05:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://grasshopperfactory.com/cbc/planning-for-2007/#comment-20320</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;valtrex...&lt;/strong&gt;

news...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>valtrex&#8230;</strong></p>
<p>news&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Whitney</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisbrogan.com/planning-for-2007/comment-page-1/#comment-5300</link>
		<dc:creator>Whitney</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 28 Dec 2006 01:14:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://grasshopperfactory.com/cbc/planning-for-2007/#comment-5300</guid>
		<description>I started reading Wikinomics- I think some of the principals are the same as the Spider and the Starfish.  I think many of us see a tipping point coming, where things will either do great or totally implode.  The point is not to make the mistakes of the last dot com boom where sillier and sillier ideas were funded out the ying yang- (If one of your ideas does get funded- put your money into a very safe place- don;t suffer the fate of Enron employees and leave it all in stock options.)  Look for things that meet the value add rationale- who is making a difference and truly meeting a need- and who is only meeting a want, a fad, a passing fancy.  In my opinion, there are a bunch of these things making some headway, but they are destined for the fate of the pet rock.  Other tools really make a substantial difference in how information is processed or communicated.  And again- it&#039;s not about just copying someone else&#039;s idea and trying to be the next (fill in your example here- You tube, Digg, etc.) but it&#039;s about originality and value add- how are you improving someone&#039;s life in a tangible way?
And use the mom and dad test- if your relatives can&#039;t understand what you are talking about or why they need this new thing, then it probably won&#039;t be around that long.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I started reading Wikinomics- I think some of the principals are the same as the Spider and the Starfish.  I think many of us see a tipping point coming, where things will either do great or totally implode.  The point is not to make the mistakes of the last dot com boom where sillier and sillier ideas were funded out the ying yang- (If one of your ideas does get funded- put your money into a very safe place- don;t suffer the fate of Enron employees and leave it all in stock options.)  Look for things that meet the value add rationale- who is making a difference and truly meeting a need- and who is only meeting a want, a fad, a passing fancy.  In my opinion, there are a bunch of these things making some headway, but they are destined for the fate of the pet rock.  Other tools really make a substantial difference in how information is processed or communicated.  And again- it&#8217;s not about just copying someone else&#8217;s idea and trying to be the next (fill in your example here- You tube, Digg, etc.) but it&#8217;s about originality and value add- how are you improving someone&#8217;s life in a tangible way?<br />
And use the mom and dad test- if your relatives can&#8217;t understand what you are talking about or why they need this new thing, then it probably won&#8217;t be around that long.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Whitney</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisbrogan.com/planning-for-2007/comment-page-1/#comment-233079</link>
		<dc:creator>Whitney</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 28 Dec 2006 01:14:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://grasshopperfactory.com/cbc/planning-for-2007/#comment-233079</guid>
		<description>I started reading Wikinomics- I think some of the principals are the same as the Spider and the Starfish.  I think many of us see a tipping point coming, where things will either do great or totally implode.  The point is not to make the mistakes of the last dot com boom where sillier and sillier ideas were funded out the ying yang- (If one of your ideas does get funded- put your money into a very safe place- don;t suffer the fate of Enron employees and leave it all in stock options.)  Look for things that meet the value add rationale- who is making a difference and truly meeting a need- and who is only meeting a want, a fad, a passing fancy.  In my opinion, there are a bunch of these things making some headway, but they are destined for the fate of the pet rock.  Other tools really make a substantial difference in how information is processed or communicated.  And again- it&#039;s not about just copying someone else&#039;s idea and trying to be the next (fill in your example here- You tube, Digg, etc.) but it&#039;s about originality and value add- how are you improving someone&#039;s life in a tangible way?
And use the mom and dad test- if your relatives can&#039;t understand what you are talking about or why they need this new thing, then it probably won&#039;t be around that long.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I started reading Wikinomics- I think some of the principals are the same as the Spider and the Starfish.  I think many of us see a tipping point coming, where things will either do great or totally implode.  The point is not to make the mistakes of the last dot com boom where sillier and sillier ideas were funded out the ying yang- (If one of your ideas does get funded- put your money into a very safe place- don;t suffer the fate of Enron employees and leave it all in stock options.)  Look for things that meet the value add rationale- who is making a difference and truly meeting a need- and who is only meeting a want, a fad, a passing fancy.  In my opinion, there are a bunch of these things making some headway, but they are destined for the fate of the pet rock.  Other tools really make a substantial difference in how information is processed or communicated.  And again- it&#8217;s not about just copying someone else&#8217;s idea and trying to be the next (fill in your example here- You tube, Digg, etc.) but it&#8217;s about originality and value add- how are you improving someone&#8217;s life in a tangible way?<br />
And use the mom and dad test- if your relatives can&#8217;t understand what you are talking about or why they need this new thing, then it probably won&#8217;t be around that long.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jim Long</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisbrogan.com/planning-for-2007/comment-page-1/#comment-5294</link>
		<dc:creator>Jim Long</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 27 Dec 2006 19:59:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://grasshopperfactory.com/cbc/planning-for-2007/#comment-5294</guid>
		<description>Chris,

Thanks for the link love bro!   You&#039;re right about old media not going down without a fight.  Imagine if limitless oil popped up in everyone&#039;s backyards.   Exxon/Mobil would DEFINITELY have something to say about that.   I think social media pioneers need to stay focused on what they do best - create community/belonging, facilitate discourse, and empower participation/collaboration.  My network still doesn&#039;t get that.   Reading cherry-picked viewer emails on TV just doesn&#039;t cut it.   I  commented on Amanda Congdon&#039;s new  vlog the other day (as did many others), And she responded back and forth with me numerous times.  This helps distill ideas down  and create conversation.  At the end of it, perhaps we both came away thinking about how messages are conveyed.  Would Russert or Williams spend the time to do this? Never!  I have tremendous respect for both of them, but that&#039;s just not how  NBC is structured.  

I also think we need to keep an eye on net neutrality.  Despite the election of a neutrality-friendly congress, don&#039;t underestimate the power of big lobbyists and parlimentary tactics.

What I did NOT get for Christmas was a buyout offer from NBC (sigh).  I guess they still like me.  Alas, i must continue to toil away in the salt mines of old media, while i designing communities and getting episodes in the can for my emerging new media venture. 

Here&#039;s to a prosperous 2007 for all new media pioneers!

Jim</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Chris,</p>
<p>Thanks for the link love bro!   You&#8217;re right about old media not going down without a fight.  Imagine if limitless oil popped up in everyone&#8217;s backyards.   Exxon/Mobil would DEFINITELY have something to say about that.   I think social media pioneers need to stay focused on what they do best &#8211; create community/belonging, facilitate discourse, and empower participation/collaboration.  My network still doesn&#8217;t get that.   Reading cherry-picked viewer emails on TV just doesn&#8217;t cut it.   I  commented on Amanda Congdon&#8217;s new  vlog the other day (as did many others), And she responded back and forth with me numerous times.  This helps distill ideas down  and create conversation.  At the end of it, perhaps we both came away thinking about how messages are conveyed.  Would Russert or Williams spend the time to do this? Never!  I have tremendous respect for both of them, but that&#8217;s just not how  NBC is structured.  </p>
<p>I also think we need to keep an eye on net neutrality.  Despite the election of a neutrality-friendly congress, don&#8217;t underestimate the power of big lobbyists and parlimentary tactics.</p>
<p>What I did NOT get for Christmas was a buyout offer from NBC (sigh).  I guess they still like me.  Alas, i must continue to toil away in the salt mines of old media, while i designing communities and getting episodes in the can for my emerging new media venture. </p>
<p>Here&#8217;s to a prosperous 2007 for all new media pioneers!</p>
<p>Jim</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jim Long</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisbrogan.com/planning-for-2007/comment-page-1/#comment-233078</link>
		<dc:creator>Jim Long</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 27 Dec 2006 19:59:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://grasshopperfactory.com/cbc/planning-for-2007/#comment-233078</guid>
		<description>Chris,

Thanks for the link love bro!   You&#039;re right about old media not going down without a fight.  Imagine if limitless oil popped up in everyone&#039;s backyards.   Exxon/Mobil would DEFINITELY have something to say about that.   I think social media pioneers need to stay focused on what they do best - create community/belonging, facilitate discourse, and empower participation/collaboration.  My network still doesn&#039;t get that.   Reading cherry-picked viewer emails on TV just doesn&#039;t cut it.   I  commented on Amanda Congdon&#039;s new  vlog the other day (as did many others), And she responded back and forth with me numerous times.  This helps distill ideas down  and create conversation.  At the end of it, perhaps we both came away thinking about how messages are conveyed.  Would Russert or Williams spend the time to do this? Never!  I have tremendous respect for both of them, but that&#039;s just not how  NBC is structured.  

I also think we need to keep an eye on net neutrality.  Despite the election of a neutrality-friendly congress, don&#039;t underestimate the power of big lobbyists and parlimentary tactics.

What I did NOT get for Christmas was a buyout offer from NBC (sigh).  I guess they still like me.  Alas, i must continue to toil away in the salt mines of old media, while i designing communities and getting episodes in the can for my emerging new media venture. 

Here&#039;s to a prosperous 2007 for all new media pioneers!

Jim</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Chris,</p>
<p>Thanks for the link love bro!   You&#8217;re right about old media not going down without a fight.  Imagine if limitless oil popped up in everyone&#8217;s backyards.   Exxon/Mobil would DEFINITELY have something to say about that.   I think social media pioneers need to stay focused on what they do best &#8211; create community/belonging, facilitate discourse, and empower participation/collaboration.  My network still doesn&#8217;t get that.   Reading cherry-picked viewer emails on TV just doesn&#8217;t cut it.   I  commented on Amanda Congdon&#8217;s new  vlog the other day (as did many others), And she responded back and forth with me numerous times.  This helps distill ideas down  and create conversation.  At the end of it, perhaps we both came away thinking about how messages are conveyed.  Would Russert or Williams spend the time to do this? Never!  I have tremendous respect for both of them, but that&#8217;s just not how  NBC is structured.  </p>
<p>I also think we need to keep an eye on net neutrality.  Despite the election of a neutrality-friendly congress, don&#8217;t underestimate the power of big lobbyists and parlimentary tactics.</p>
<p>What I did NOT get for Christmas was a buyout offer from NBC (sigh).  I guess they still like me.  Alas, i must continue to toil away in the salt mines of old media, while i designing communities and getting episodes in the can for my emerging new media venture. </p>
<p>Here&#8217;s to a prosperous 2007 for all new media pioneers!</p>
<p>Jim</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Steve Sherlock</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisbrogan.com/planning-for-2007/comment-page-1/#comment-5281</link>
		<dc:creator>Steve Sherlock</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 27 Dec 2006 00:27:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://grasshopperfactory.com/cbc/planning-for-2007/#comment-5281</guid>
		<description>2007 will be a good year. The Joyful Jubilant Learning group is going to get into high gear. We collaboratively put together our own 12 days of Christmas. A simple start but indication of more to come. 

http://www.joyfuljubilantlearning.com/joyful_jubilant_learning/2006/12/twelve_days_of_.html

Enjoy!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>2007 will be a good year. The Joyful Jubilant Learning group is going to get into high gear. We collaboratively put together our own 12 days of Christmas. A simple start but indication of more to come. </p>
<p><a href="http://www.joyfuljubilantlearning.com/joyful_jubilant_learning/2006/12/twelve_days_of_.html" rel="nofollow">http://www.joyfuljubilantlearning.com/joyful_jubilant_learning/2006/12/twelve_days_of_.html</a></p>
<p>Enjoy!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Steve Sherlock</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisbrogan.com/planning-for-2007/comment-page-1/#comment-233077</link>
		<dc:creator>Steve Sherlock</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 27 Dec 2006 00:27:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://grasshopperfactory.com/cbc/planning-for-2007/#comment-233077</guid>
		<description>2007 will be a good year. The Joyful Jubilant Learning group is going to get into high gear. We collaboratively put together our own 12 days of Christmas. A simple start but indication of more to come. 

http://www.joyfuljubilantlearning.com/joyful_jubilant_learning/2006/12/twelve_days_of_.html

Enjoy!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>2007 will be a good year. The Joyful Jubilant Learning group is going to get into high gear. We collaboratively put together our own 12 days of Christmas. A simple start but indication of more to come. </p>
<p><a href="http://www.joyfuljubilantlearning.com/joyful_jubilant_learning/2006/12/twelve_days_of_.html" rel="nofollow">http://www.joyfuljubilantlearning.com/joyful_jubilant_learning/2006/12/twelve_days_of_.html</a></p>
<p>Enjoy!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: steve garfield</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisbrogan.com/planning-for-2007/comment-page-1/#comment-5273</link>
		<dc:creator>steve garfield</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 26 Dec 2006 17:50:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://grasshopperfactory.com/cbc/planning-for-2007/#comment-5273</guid>
		<description>I need to take a breath and think about 2007.  you&#039;ve done a good job getting some thoughts down.

To start 2007 off, the Boston Media Makers are going to &#039;make a movie&#039;

We&#039;ll be meeting on Sunday Jan 7th at Sweet Finnish in JP and make a video of Sweet Finnish.  After that we are going to help pucsh Ravi&#039;s car into the new Axiom art studio at Green Street and film that too.

There&#039;s going to be lots of cameras and computers and video making...

http://bostonmediamakers.wordpress.com/

Everyone is invited.  No agenda, no real plans, other than mingling at 10:00.  Then we&#039;ll see what happens...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I need to take a breath and think about 2007.  you&#8217;ve done a good job getting some thoughts down.</p>
<p>To start 2007 off, the Boston Media Makers are going to &#8216;make a movie&#8217;</p>
<p>We&#8217;ll be meeting on Sunday Jan 7th at Sweet Finnish in JP and make a video of Sweet Finnish.  After that we are going to help pucsh Ravi&#8217;s car into the new Axiom art studio at Green Street and film that too.</p>
<p>There&#8217;s going to be lots of cameras and computers and video making&#8230;</p>
<p><a href="http://bostonmediamakers.wordpress.com/" rel="nofollow">http://bostonmediamakers.wordpress.com/</a></p>
<p>Everyone is invited.  No agenda, no real plans, other than mingling at 10:00.  Then we&#8217;ll see what happens&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

