<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Remember Blogging and Podcasting</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.chrisbrogan.com/remember-blogging-and-podcasting/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.chrisbrogan.com/remember-blogging-and-podcasting/</link>
	<description>Learn How Human Business Works - Beyond Social Media</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 12:25:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: youtube downloader</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisbrogan.com/remember-blogging-and-podcasting/comment-page-2/#comment-288615</link>
		<dc:creator>youtube downloader</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 07 Dec 2010 15:40:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisbrogan.com/?p=2699#comment-288615</guid>
		<description>Another reason is that the feedback loop is so much tighter when doing a ping pong game of ideas instead of the blogger-to-comments model. </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Another reason is that the feedback loop is so much tighter when doing a ping pong game of ideas instead of the blogger-to-comments model.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: youtube downloader</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisbrogan.com/remember-blogging-and-podcasting/comment-page-2/#comment-288616</link>
		<dc:creator>youtube downloader</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 07 Dec 2010 15:40:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisbrogan.com/?p=2699#comment-288616</guid>
		<description>Another reason is that the feedback loop is so much tighter when doing a ping pong game of ideas instead of the blogger-to-comments model. </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Another reason is that the feedback loop is so much tighter when doing a ping pong game of ideas instead of the blogger-to-comments model.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Why Blogging is Not Dying &#124; by Ari Herzog</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisbrogan.com/remember-blogging-and-podcasting/comment-page-2/#comment-144430</link>
		<dc:creator>Why Blogging is Not Dying &#124; by Ari Herzog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 10 Nov 2008 04:54:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisbrogan.com/?p=2699#comment-144430</guid>
		<description>[...] Is Harvard Business Review former executive editor Nick Carr correct that blogs are lacking personality and experiencing a midlife crisis, echoing similar commentary by Chris Brogan that people are writing less and shifting to podcasting and video blogging? [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Is Harvard Business Review former executive editor Nick Carr correct that blogs are lacking personality and experiencing a midlife crisis, echoing similar commentary by Chris Brogan that people are writing less and shifting to podcasting and video blogging? [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jon Gatrell</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisbrogan.com/remember-blogging-and-podcasting/comment-page-2/#comment-130389</link>
		<dc:creator>Jon Gatrell</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 09 Aug 2008 12:40:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisbrogan.com/?p=2699#comment-130389</guid>
		<description>I&#039;ve just went the other way, I&#039;m trying to reduce the twitter, link and limited effort posts on my blog. It felt spammy and I was called out for the just lack of effort.  We are all busy, but here is my evolution of thought which made me change my mind on how to address and engage on my blog:

There is just so much content which isn&#039;t interesting, including tweets.
http://spatiallyrelevant.org/2008/07/14/nothing-of-interest-today-move-on/

I realized I should stop contributing to the fluff.
http://spatiallyrelevant.org/2008/07/24/less-fluff-more-value/

I also realized that I other people have good things to say, perhaps more so than me.
http://spatiallyrelevant.org/2008/08/03/great-ideas-maybe-not-but-they-are-yours/

I&#039;ve already posted 1 of them and have handful of other inquiries, so not sure where this comment is going, but while there may be a sea change underway for platforms, I think that is like the cool kid early adopter folk mainly.  

Good post, sorry for the multiple links, but thought it would interesting to share my evolution towards a re-invigorated approach to my blog and ensuring sustained mediocrity.

~jon</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;ve just went the other way, I&#8217;m trying to reduce the twitter, link and limited effort posts on my blog. It felt spammy and I was called out for the just lack of effort.  We are all busy, but here is my evolution of thought which made me change my mind on how to address and engage on my blog:</p>
<p>There is just so much content which isn&#8217;t interesting, including tweets.<br />
<a href="http://spatiallyrelevant.org/2008/07/14/nothing-of-interest-today-move-on/" rel="nofollow">http://spatiallyrelevant.org/2008/07/14/nothing-of-interest-today-move-on/</a></p>
<p>I realized I should stop contributing to the fluff.<br />
<a href="http://spatiallyrelevant.org/2008/07/24/less-fluff-more-value/" rel="nofollow">http://spatiallyrelevant.org/2008/07/24/less-fluff-more-value/</a></p>
<p>I also realized that I other people have good things to say, perhaps more so than me.<br />
<a href="http://spatiallyrelevant.org/2008/08/03/great-ideas-maybe-not-but-they-are-yours/" rel="nofollow">http://spatiallyrelevant.org/2008/08/03/great-ideas-maybe-not-but-they-are-yours/</a></p>
<p>I&#8217;ve already posted 1 of them and have handful of other inquiries, so not sure where this comment is going, but while there may be a sea change underway for platforms, I think that is like the cool kid early adopter folk mainly.  </p>
<p>Good post, sorry for the multiple links, but thought it would interesting to share my evolution towards a re-invigorated approach to my blog and ensuring sustained mediocrity.</p>
<p>~jon</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jon Gatrell</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisbrogan.com/remember-blogging-and-podcasting/comment-page-2/#comment-249958</link>
		<dc:creator>Jon Gatrell</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 09 Aug 2008 12:40:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisbrogan.com/?p=2699#comment-249958</guid>
		<description>I&#039;ve just went the other way, I&#039;m trying to reduce the twitter, link and limited effort posts on my blog. It felt spammy and I was called out for the just lack of effort.  We are all busy, but here is my evolution of thought which made me change my mind on how to address and engage on my blog:

There is just so much content which isn&#039;t interesting, including tweets.
http://spatiallyrelevant.org/2008/07/14/nothing-of-interest-today-move-on/

I realized I should stop contributing to the fluff.
http://spatiallyrelevant.org/2008/07/24/less-fluff-more-value/

I also realized that I other people have good things to say, perhaps more so than me.
http://spatiallyrelevant.org/2008/08/03/great-ideas-maybe-not-but-they-are-yours/

I&#039;ve already posted 1 of them and have handful of other inquiries, so not sure where this comment is going, but while there may be a sea change underway for platforms, I think that is like the cool kid early adopter folk mainly.  

Good post, sorry for the multiple links, but thought it would interesting to share my evolution towards a re-invigorated approach to my blog and ensuring sustained mediocrity.

~jon</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;ve just went the other way, I&#8217;m trying to reduce the twitter, link and limited effort posts on my blog. It felt spammy and I was called out for the just lack of effort.  We are all busy, but here is my evolution of thought which made me change my mind on how to address and engage on my blog:</p>
<p>There is just so much content which isn&#8217;t interesting, including tweets.<br />
<a href="http://spatiallyrelevant.org/2008/07/14/nothing-of-interest-today-move-on/" rel="nofollow">http://spatiallyrelevant.org/2008/07/14/nothing-of-interest-today-move-on/</a></p>
<p>I realized I should stop contributing to the fluff.<br />
<a href="http://spatiallyrelevant.org/2008/07/24/less-fluff-more-value/" rel="nofollow">http://spatiallyrelevant.org/2008/07/24/less-fluff-more-value/</a></p>
<p>I also realized that I other people have good things to say, perhaps more so than me.<br />
<a href="http://spatiallyrelevant.org/2008/08/03/great-ideas-maybe-not-but-they-are-yours/" rel="nofollow">http://spatiallyrelevant.org/2008/08/03/great-ideas-maybe-not-but-they-are-yours/</a></p>
<p>I&#8217;ve already posted 1 of them and have handful of other inquiries, so not sure where this comment is going, but while there may be a sea change underway for platforms, I think that is like the cool kid early adopter folk mainly.  </p>
<p>Good post, sorry for the multiple links, but thought it would interesting to share my evolution towards a re-invigorated approach to my blog and ensuring sustained mediocrity.</p>
<p>~jon</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jon Gatrell</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisbrogan.com/remember-blogging-and-podcasting/comment-page-2/#comment-249959</link>
		<dc:creator>Jon Gatrell</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 09 Aug 2008 12:40:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisbrogan.com/?p=2699#comment-249959</guid>
		<description>I&#039;ve just went the other way, I&#039;m trying to reduce the twitter, link and limited effort posts on my blog. It felt spammy and I was called out for the just lack of effort.  We are all busy, but here is my evolution of thought which made me change my mind on how to address and engage on my blog:

There is just so much content which isn&#039;t interesting, including tweets.
http://spatiallyrelevant.org/2008/07/14/nothing-of-interest-today-move-on/

I realized I should stop contributing to the fluff.
http://spatiallyrelevant.org/2008/07/24/less-fluff-more-value/

I also realized that I other people have good things to say, perhaps more so than me.
http://spatiallyrelevant.org/2008/08/03/great-ideas-maybe-not-but-they-are-yours/

I&#039;ve already posted 1 of them and have handful of other inquiries, so not sure where this comment is going, but while there may be a sea change underway for platforms, I think that is like the cool kid early adopter folk mainly.  

Good post, sorry for the multiple links, but thought it would interesting to share my evolution towards a re-invigorated approach to my blog and ensuring sustained mediocrity.

~jon</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;ve just went the other way, I&#8217;m trying to reduce the twitter, link and limited effort posts on my blog. It felt spammy and I was called out for the just lack of effort.  We are all busy, but here is my evolution of thought which made me change my mind on how to address and engage on my blog:</p>
<p>There is just so much content which isn&#8217;t interesting, including tweets.<br />
<a href="http://spatiallyrelevant.org/2008/07/14/nothing-of-interest-today-move-on/" rel="nofollow">http://spatiallyrelevant.org/2008/07/14/nothing-of-interest-today-move-on/</a></p>
<p>I realized I should stop contributing to the fluff.<br />
<a href="http://spatiallyrelevant.org/2008/07/24/less-fluff-more-value/" rel="nofollow">http://spatiallyrelevant.org/2008/07/24/less-fluff-more-value/</a></p>
<p>I also realized that I other people have good things to say, perhaps more so than me.<br />
<a href="http://spatiallyrelevant.org/2008/08/03/great-ideas-maybe-not-but-they-are-yours/" rel="nofollow">http://spatiallyrelevant.org/2008/08/03/great-ideas-maybe-not-but-they-are-yours/</a></p>
<p>I&#8217;ve already posted 1 of them and have handful of other inquiries, so not sure where this comment is going, but while there may be a sea change underway for platforms, I think that is like the cool kid early adopter folk mainly.  </p>
<p>Good post, sorry for the multiple links, but thought it would interesting to share my evolution towards a re-invigorated approach to my blog and ensuring sustained mediocrity.</p>
<p>~jon</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Nicky</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisbrogan.com/remember-blogging-and-podcasting/comment-page-2/#comment-130227</link>
		<dc:creator>Nicky</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 07 Aug 2008 23:28:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisbrogan.com/?p=2699#comment-130227</guid>
		<description>I think that when starting out many do not realise the time and commitment that blogging requires. Both in the actual writing and searching out fresh content, consistently and often enough and long term. It is hard work. ... and I think people just get tired or get distracted. 

But there&#039;s nothing more depressing than a deserted blog of several months or even weeks. I post to my personal blog, (very niche and which I started 3 years ago) every week. I used to blog 3 times a week, but decided that was the quickest way to burn out. Like many I also work full time. So I let my readers know my blogging frequency was changing and they were cool. The interaction became stronger and more frequent if anything.  They now carry on conversations on it without me needing to reply to every post  as I used to. My only regret is that I don&#039;t have time to visit all the blogs of those who visit and comment on mine... another essential part of blogging.

I am also quite active on Facebook, and I haven&#039;t found it detracted from blogging at all. I use it very differently to blogging.
I am just about to try Twitter but for business stuff(time will tell if it&#039;s a good  idea or not), and I am thinking of starting a new marketing related blog. But knowing the time commitment has made me delay because I know what it&#039;s going to involve. Twitter won&#039;t replace blogging... I look at it like my FB status updates.

 There are some who advocate farming out your blog posts, but since blogging is a form of personal expression this won&#039;t work for my personal blog and I&#039;m not too sure if it will for my business related one either. But it solves the issue of content frequency.
It would be a shame if blogs faded (personally don&#039;t think they are) because in many cases they are freedom from listening to the controlled media.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think that when starting out many do not realise the time and commitment that blogging requires. Both in the actual writing and searching out fresh content, consistently and often enough and long term. It is hard work. &#8230; and I think people just get tired or get distracted. </p>
<p>But there&#8217;s nothing more depressing than a deserted blog of several months or even weeks. I post to my personal blog, (very niche and which I started 3 years ago) every week. I used to blog 3 times a week, but decided that was the quickest way to burn out. Like many I also work full time. So I let my readers know my blogging frequency was changing and they were cool. The interaction became stronger and more frequent if anything.  They now carry on conversations on it without me needing to reply to every post  as I used to. My only regret is that I don&#8217;t have time to visit all the blogs of those who visit and comment on mine&#8230; another essential part of blogging.</p>
<p>I am also quite active on Facebook, and I haven&#8217;t found it detracted from blogging at all. I use it very differently to blogging.<br />
I am just about to try Twitter but for business stuff(time will tell if it&#8217;s a good  idea or not), and I am thinking of starting a new marketing related blog. But knowing the time commitment has made me delay because I know what it&#8217;s going to involve. Twitter won&#8217;t replace blogging&#8230; I look at it like my FB status updates.</p>
<p> There are some who advocate farming out your blog posts, but since blogging is a form of personal expression this won&#8217;t work for my personal blog and I&#8217;m not too sure if it will for my business related one either. But it solves the issue of content frequency.<br />
It would be a shame if blogs faded (personally don&#8217;t think they are) because in many cases they are freedom from listening to the controlled media.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Nicky</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisbrogan.com/remember-blogging-and-podcasting/comment-page-2/#comment-249956</link>
		<dc:creator>Nicky</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 07 Aug 2008 23:28:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisbrogan.com/?p=2699#comment-249956</guid>
		<description>I think that when starting out many do not realise the time and commitment that blogging requires. Both in the actual writing and searching out fresh content, consistently and often enough and long term. It is hard work. ... and I think people just get tired or get distracted. 

But there&#039;s nothing more depressing than a deserted blog of several months or even weeks. I post to my personal blog, (very niche and which I started 3 years ago) every week. I used to blog 3 times a week, but decided that was the quickest way to burn out. Like many I also work full time. So I let my readers know my blogging frequency was changing and they were cool. The interaction became stronger and more frequent if anything.  They now carry on conversations on it without me needing to reply to every post  as I used to. My only regret is that I don&#039;t have time to visit all the blogs of those who visit and comment on mine... another essential part of blogging.

I am also quite active on Facebook, and I haven&#039;t found it detracted from blogging at all. I use it very differently to blogging.
I am just about to try Twitter but for business stuff(time will tell if it&#039;s a good  idea or not), and I am thinking of starting a new marketing related blog. But knowing the time commitment has made me delay because I know what it&#039;s going to involve. Twitter won&#039;t replace blogging... I look at it like my FB status updates.

 There are some who advocate farming out your blog posts, but since blogging is a form of personal expression this won&#039;t work for my personal blog and I&#039;m not too sure if it will for my business related one either. But it solves the issue of content frequency.
It would be a shame if blogs faded (personally don&#039;t think they are) because in many cases they are freedom from listening to the controlled media.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think that when starting out many do not realise the time and commitment that blogging requires. Both in the actual writing and searching out fresh content, consistently and often enough and long term. It is hard work. &#8230; and I think people just get tired or get distracted. </p>
<p>But there&#8217;s nothing more depressing than a deserted blog of several months or even weeks. I post to my personal blog, (very niche and which I started 3 years ago) every week. I used to blog 3 times a week, but decided that was the quickest way to burn out. Like many I also work full time. So I let my readers know my blogging frequency was changing and they were cool. The interaction became stronger and more frequent if anything.  They now carry on conversations on it without me needing to reply to every post  as I used to. My only regret is that I don&#8217;t have time to visit all the blogs of those who visit and comment on mine&#8230; another essential part of blogging.</p>
<p>I am also quite active on Facebook, and I haven&#8217;t found it detracted from blogging at all. I use it very differently to blogging.<br />
I am just about to try Twitter but for business stuff(time will tell if it&#8217;s a good  idea or not), and I am thinking of starting a new marketing related blog. But knowing the time commitment has made me delay because I know what it&#8217;s going to involve. Twitter won&#8217;t replace blogging&#8230; I look at it like my FB status updates.</p>
<p> There are some who advocate farming out your blog posts, but since blogging is a form of personal expression this won&#8217;t work for my personal blog and I&#8217;m not too sure if it will for my business related one either. But it solves the issue of content frequency.<br />
It would be a shame if blogs faded (personally don&#8217;t think they are) because in many cases they are freedom from listening to the controlled media.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Nicky</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisbrogan.com/remember-blogging-and-podcasting/comment-page-2/#comment-249957</link>
		<dc:creator>Nicky</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 07 Aug 2008 23:28:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisbrogan.com/?p=2699#comment-249957</guid>
		<description>I think that when starting out many do not realise the time and commitment that blogging requires. Both in the actual writing and searching out fresh content, consistently and often enough and long term. It is hard work. ... and I think people just get tired or get distracted. 

But there&#039;s nothing more depressing than a deserted blog of several months or even weeks. I post to my personal blog, (very niche and which I started 3 years ago) every week. I used to blog 3 times a week, but decided that was the quickest way to burn out. Like many I also work full time. So I let my readers know my blogging frequency was changing and they were cool. The interaction became stronger and more frequent if anything.  They now carry on conversations on it without me needing to reply to every post  as I used to. My only regret is that I don&#039;t have time to visit all the blogs of those who visit and comment on mine... another essential part of blogging.

I am also quite active on Facebook, and I haven&#039;t found it detracted from blogging at all. I use it very differently to blogging.
I am just about to try Twitter but for business stuff(time will tell if it&#039;s a good  idea or not), and I am thinking of starting a new marketing related blog. But knowing the time commitment has made me delay because I know what it&#039;s going to involve. Twitter won&#039;t replace blogging... I look at it like my FB status updates.

 There are some who advocate farming out your blog posts, but since blogging is a form of personal expression this won&#039;t work for my personal blog and I&#039;m not too sure if it will for my business related one either. But it solves the issue of content frequency.
It would be a shame if blogs faded (personally don&#039;t think they are) because in many cases they are freedom from listening to the controlled media.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think that when starting out many do not realise the time and commitment that blogging requires. Both in the actual writing and searching out fresh content, consistently and often enough and long term. It is hard work. &#8230; and I think people just get tired or get distracted. </p>
<p>But there&#8217;s nothing more depressing than a deserted blog of several months or even weeks. I post to my personal blog, (very niche and which I started 3 years ago) every week. I used to blog 3 times a week, but decided that was the quickest way to burn out. Like many I also work full time. So I let my readers know my blogging frequency was changing and they were cool. The interaction became stronger and more frequent if anything.  They now carry on conversations on it without me needing to reply to every post  as I used to. My only regret is that I don&#8217;t have time to visit all the blogs of those who visit and comment on mine&#8230; another essential part of blogging.</p>
<p>I am also quite active on Facebook, and I haven&#8217;t found it detracted from blogging at all. I use it very differently to blogging.<br />
I am just about to try Twitter but for business stuff(time will tell if it&#8217;s a good  idea or not), and I am thinking of starting a new marketing related blog. But knowing the time commitment has made me delay because I know what it&#8217;s going to involve. Twitter won&#8217;t replace blogging&#8230; I look at it like my FB status updates.</p>
<p> There are some who advocate farming out your blog posts, but since blogging is a form of personal expression this won&#8217;t work for my personal blog and I&#8217;m not too sure if it will for my business related one either. But it solves the issue of content frequency.<br />
It would be a shame if blogs faded (personally don&#8217;t think they are) because in many cases they are freedom from listening to the controlled media.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Angela Connor</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisbrogan.com/remember-blogging-and-podcasting/comment-page-2/#comment-130196</link>
		<dc:creator>Angela Connor</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 07 Aug 2008 17:18:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisbrogan.com/?p=2699#comment-130196</guid>
		<description>I&#039;ve read many blogs lately about blogs being replaced by e-mail newsletters. I&#039;ve also commented on several that I will not subscribe to an endless amount of e-mail newsletters, so if many of the bloggers I follow opt to head in that direction, they will lose me. There&#039;s a fine line between my Inbox/BlackBerry and my feed reader. You can&#039;t be in both, unless you&#039;re super-compelling or giving away free money.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;ve read many blogs lately about blogs being replaced by e-mail newsletters. I&#8217;ve also commented on several that I will not subscribe to an endless amount of e-mail newsletters, so if many of the bloggers I follow opt to head in that direction, they will lose me. There&#8217;s a fine line between my Inbox/BlackBerry and my feed reader. You can&#8217;t be in both, unless you&#8217;re super-compelling or giving away free money.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

