<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Remember Blogging and Podcasting</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.chrisbrogan.com/remember-blogging-and-podcasting/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.chrisbrogan.com/remember-blogging-and-podcasting/</link>
	<description>Learn How Human Business Works - Beyond Social Media</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 13 Mar 2010 03:43:49 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Why Blogging is Not Dying &#124; by Ari Herzog</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisbrogan.com/remember-blogging-and-podcasting/comment-page-1/#comment-144430</link>
		<dc:creator>Why Blogging is Not Dying &#124; by Ari Herzog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 10 Nov 2008 04:54:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisbrogan.com/?p=2699#comment-144430</guid>
		<description>[...] Is Harvard Business Review former executive editor Nick Carr correct that blogs are lacking personality and experiencing a midlife crisis, echoing similar commentary by Chris Brogan that people are writing less and shifting to podcasting and video blogging? [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Is Harvard Business Review former executive editor Nick Carr correct that blogs are lacking personality and experiencing a midlife crisis, echoing similar commentary by Chris Brogan that people are writing less and shifting to podcasting and video blogging? [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jon Gatrell</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisbrogan.com/remember-blogging-and-podcasting/comment-page-1/#comment-130389</link>
		<dc:creator>Jon Gatrell</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 09 Aug 2008 12:40:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisbrogan.com/?p=2699#comment-130389</guid>
		<description>I&#039;ve just went the other way, I&#039;m trying to reduce the twitter, link and limited effort posts on my blog. It felt spammy and I was called out for the just lack of effort.  We are all busy, but here is my evolution of thought which made me change my mind on how to address and engage on my blog:

There is just so much content which isn&#039;t interesting, including tweets.
http://spatiallyrelevant.org/2008/07/14/nothing-of-interest-today-move-on/

I realized I should stop contributing to the fluff.
http://spatiallyrelevant.org/2008/07/24/less-fluff-more-value/

I also realized that I other people have good things to say, perhaps more so than me.
http://spatiallyrelevant.org/2008/08/03/great-ideas-maybe-not-but-they-are-yours/

I&#039;ve already posted 1 of them and have handful of other inquiries, so not sure where this comment is going, but while there may be a sea change underway for platforms, I think that is like the cool kid early adopter folk mainly.  

Good post, sorry for the multiple links, but thought it would interesting to share my evolution towards a re-invigorated approach to my blog and ensuring sustained mediocrity.

~jon</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;ve just went the other way, I&#8217;m trying to reduce the twitter, link and limited effort posts on my blog. It felt spammy and I was called out for the just lack of effort.  We are all busy, but here is my evolution of thought which made me change my mind on how to address and engage on my blog:</p>
<p>There is just so much content which isn&#8217;t interesting, including tweets.<br />
<a href="http://spatiallyrelevant.org/2008/07/14/nothing-of-interest-today-move-on/" rel="nofollow">http://spatiallyrelevant.org/2008/07/14/nothing-of-interest-today-move-on/</a></p>
<p>I realized I should stop contributing to the fluff.<br />
<a href="http://spatiallyrelevant.org/2008/07/24/less-fluff-more-value/" rel="nofollow">http://spatiallyrelevant.org/2008/07/24/less-fluff-more-value/</a></p>
<p>I also realized that I other people have good things to say, perhaps more so than me.<br />
<a href="http://spatiallyrelevant.org/2008/08/03/great-ideas-maybe-not-but-they-are-yours/" rel="nofollow">http://spatiallyrelevant.org/2008/08/03/great-ideas-maybe-not-but-they-are-yours/</a></p>
<p>I&#8217;ve already posted 1 of them and have handful of other inquiries, so not sure where this comment is going, but while there may be a sea change underway for platforms, I think that is like the cool kid early adopter folk mainly.  </p>
<p>Good post, sorry for the multiple links, but thought it would interesting to share my evolution towards a re-invigorated approach to my blog and ensuring sustained mediocrity.</p>
<p>~jon</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Nicky</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisbrogan.com/remember-blogging-and-podcasting/comment-page-1/#comment-130227</link>
		<dc:creator>Nicky</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 07 Aug 2008 23:28:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisbrogan.com/?p=2699#comment-130227</guid>
		<description>I think that when starting out many do not realise the time and commitment that blogging requires. Both in the actual writing and searching out fresh content, consistently and often enough and long term. It is hard work. ... and I think people just get tired or get distracted. 

But there&#039;s nothing more depressing than a deserted blog of several months or even weeks. I post to my personal blog, (very niche and which I started 3 years ago) every week. I used to blog 3 times a week, but decided that was the quickest way to burn out. Like many I also work full time. So I let my readers know my blogging frequency was changing and they were cool. The interaction became stronger and more frequent if anything.  They now carry on conversations on it without me needing to reply to every post  as I used to. My only regret is that I don&#039;t have time to visit all the blogs of those who visit and comment on mine... another essential part of blogging.

I am also quite active on Facebook, and I haven&#039;t found it detracted from blogging at all. I use it very differently to blogging.
I am just about to try Twitter but for business stuff(time will tell if it&#039;s a good  idea or not), and I am thinking of starting a new marketing related blog. But knowing the time commitment has made me delay because I know what it&#039;s going to involve. Twitter won&#039;t replace blogging... I look at it like my FB status updates.

 There are some who advocate farming out your blog posts, but since blogging is a form of personal expression this won&#039;t work for my personal blog and I&#039;m not too sure if it will for my business related one either. But it solves the issue of content frequency.
It would be a shame if blogs faded (personally don&#039;t think they are) because in many cases they are freedom from listening to the controlled media.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think that when starting out many do not realise the time and commitment that blogging requires. Both in the actual writing and searching out fresh content, consistently and often enough and long term. It is hard work. &#8230; and I think people just get tired or get distracted. </p>
<p>But there&#8217;s nothing more depressing than a deserted blog of several months or even weeks. I post to my personal blog, (very niche and which I started 3 years ago) every week. I used to blog 3 times a week, but decided that was the quickest way to burn out. Like many I also work full time. So I let my readers know my blogging frequency was changing and they were cool. The interaction became stronger and more frequent if anything.  They now carry on conversations on it without me needing to reply to every post  as I used to. My only regret is that I don&#8217;t have time to visit all the blogs of those who visit and comment on mine&#8230; another essential part of blogging.</p>
<p>I am also quite active on Facebook, and I haven&#8217;t found it detracted from blogging at all. I use it very differently to blogging.<br />
I am just about to try Twitter but for business stuff(time will tell if it&#8217;s a good  idea or not), and I am thinking of starting a new marketing related blog. But knowing the time commitment has made me delay because I know what it&#8217;s going to involve. Twitter won&#8217;t replace blogging&#8230; I look at it like my FB status updates.</p>
<p> There are some who advocate farming out your blog posts, but since blogging is a form of personal expression this won&#8217;t work for my personal blog and I&#8217;m not too sure if it will for my business related one either. But it solves the issue of content frequency.<br />
It would be a shame if blogs faded (personally don&#8217;t think they are) because in many cases they are freedom from listening to the controlled media.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Angela Connor</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisbrogan.com/remember-blogging-and-podcasting/comment-page-1/#comment-130196</link>
		<dc:creator>Angela Connor</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 07 Aug 2008 17:18:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisbrogan.com/?p=2699#comment-130196</guid>
		<description>I&#039;ve read many blogs lately about blogs being replaced by e-mail newsletters. I&#039;ve also commented on several that I will not subscribe to an endless amount of e-mail newsletters, so if many of the bloggers I follow opt to head in that direction, they will lose me. There&#039;s a fine line between my Inbox/BlackBerry and my feed reader. You can&#039;t be in both, unless you&#039;re super-compelling or giving away free money.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;ve read many blogs lately about blogs being replaced by e-mail newsletters. I&#8217;ve also commented on several that I will not subscribe to an endless amount of e-mail newsletters, so if many of the bloggers I follow opt to head in that direction, they will lose me. There&#8217;s a fine line between my Inbox/BlackBerry and my feed reader. You can&#8217;t be in both, unless you&#8217;re super-compelling or giving away free money.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Steve Cook</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisbrogan.com/remember-blogging-and-podcasting/comment-page-1/#comment-130181</link>
		<dc:creator>Steve Cook</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 07 Aug 2008 14:50:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisbrogan.com/?p=2699#comment-130181</guid>
		<description>My personal blog (which I have been maintaining since 2000) has not been updated for quite a while thanks in part to using Facebook and in part to not prioritising it during an intense period in my life.

However as I am currently starting up a new company (spun off in a new direction from my old company) I am now looking at starting a new business based blog.

I think that it is perhaps the intention behind the blog that affects whether people move to social media instead. If the main reason you blog is to keep friends updated about what&#039;s going on in your life, then Twitter and Facebook etc can do the job easier and allow you a richer interaction with your friends. If you use your blog as a means of self expression, promotion or to make money in some way then you&#039;re more likely to keep on blogging as it&#039;s more visible through search engines etc, is more possible to mould into your own personal brand and is probably the right tool for the job.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>My personal blog (which I have been maintaining since 2000) has not been updated for quite a while thanks in part to using Facebook and in part to not prioritising it during an intense period in my life.</p>
<p>However as I am currently starting up a new company (spun off in a new direction from my old company) I am now looking at starting a new business based blog.</p>
<p>I think that it is perhaps the intention behind the blog that affects whether people move to social media instead. If the main reason you blog is to keep friends updated about what&#8217;s going on in your life, then Twitter and Facebook etc can do the job easier and allow you a richer interaction with your friends. If you use your blog as a means of self expression, promotion or to make money in some way then you&#8217;re more likely to keep on blogging as it&#8217;s more visible through search engines etc, is more possible to mould into your own personal brand and is probably the right tool for the job.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Paul Stallard</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisbrogan.com/remember-blogging-and-podcasting/comment-page-1/#comment-130164</link>
		<dc:creator>Paul Stallard</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 07 Aug 2008 12:43:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisbrogan.com/?p=2699#comment-130164</guid>
		<description>Your comments are in line with a number of other pieces I have read recently which suggests the number of blogs actually being written is falling.  Is this because of the lure of other tools or are people falling out of love with their blogs?  I personally prefer the freedom a blog provides you on length over the 140 characters which can be frustrating.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Your comments are in line with a number of other pieces I have read recently which suggests the number of blogs actually being written is falling.  Is this because of the lure of other tools or are people falling out of love with their blogs?  I personally prefer the freedom a blog provides you on length over the 140 characters which can be frustrating.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Cynthia C</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisbrogan.com/remember-blogging-and-podcasting/comment-page-1/#comment-130163</link>
		<dc:creator>Cynthia C</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 07 Aug 2008 12:27:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisbrogan.com/?p=2699#comment-130163</guid>
		<description>Twitter type sites only work if your blog is intended to be just that...a blog.  If you have an online newspaper or magazine as I do, it&#039;s virtually impossible to do so!  Posts are too long!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Twitter type sites only work if your blog is intended to be just that&#8230;a blog.  If you have an online newspaper or magazine as I do, it&#8217;s virtually impossible to do so!  Posts are too long!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sean Bohan</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisbrogan.com/remember-blogging-and-podcasting/comment-page-1/#comment-130104</link>
		<dc:creator>Sean Bohan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 07 Aug 2008 03:42:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisbrogan.com/?p=2699#comment-130104</guid>
		<description>No more twitter feed - original ideas from now on, not re-tweets

quantity vs value = value wins</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>No more twitter feed &#8211; original ideas from now on, not re-tweets</p>
<p>quantity vs value = value wins</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: lawton chiles</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisbrogan.com/remember-blogging-and-podcasting/comment-page-1/#comment-130097</link>
		<dc:creator>lawton chiles</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 07 Aug 2008 03:11:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisbrogan.com/?p=2699#comment-130097</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m still here Chris, and writing almost daily. Is anyone listening? That is certainly the case, and of the folks I have talked to, my writing is making a difference, so I can be grateful for that impact.

-&gt; I think people are using Twitter and other social go-betweens b/c like you said, it is faster and more well, like regular conversation. But the Twitter experience is not a lasting experience, like a blog post can be. 

Not enough thought processes go into 140 little characters. 

Each has it&#039;s own use, right?

Rock on,

lawton</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m still here Chris, and writing almost daily. Is anyone listening? That is certainly the case, and of the folks I have talked to, my writing is making a difference, so I can be grateful for that impact.</p>
<p>-&gt; I think people are using Twitter and other social go-betweens b/c like you said, it is faster and more well, like regular conversation. But the Twitter experience is not a lasting experience, like a blog post can be. </p>
<p>Not enough thought processes go into 140 little characters. </p>
<p>Each has it&#8217;s own use, right?</p>
<p>Rock on,</p>
<p>lawton</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Wendy Piersall</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisbrogan.com/remember-blogging-and-podcasting/comment-page-1/#comment-130094</link>
		<dc:creator>Wendy Piersall</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 07 Aug 2008 02:02:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisbrogan.com/?p=2699#comment-130094</guid>
		<description>Seriously! Sometimes I feel like I am blogging in an empty room - the conversation has significantly moved off of blogs and onto Twitter, especially for my regular readers. There are times when I have gotten more comments about a post on Twitter than I have on my blog.

I miss everyone too. :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Seriously! Sometimes I feel like I am blogging in an empty room &#8211; the conversation has significantly moved off of blogs and onto Twitter, especially for my regular readers. There are times when I have gotten more comments about a post on Twitter than I have on my blog.</p>
<p>I miss everyone too. :)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
