<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>chrisbrogan.com&#187; andysernovitz</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.chrisbrogan.com/tag/andysernovitz/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.chrisbrogan.com</link>
	<description>Learn How Human Business Works - Beyond Social Media</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 06 Feb 2012 09:30:05 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>I Support the Future of Sponsored Posts</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisbrogan.com/i-support-the-future-of-sponsored-posts/</link>
		<comments>http://www.chrisbrogan.com/i-support-the-future-of-sponsored-posts/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 20 Apr 2009 18:15:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>ceb</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Article]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[andysernovitz]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[blogging]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[contentmarketing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[izea]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sponsoredposts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[tedmurphy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[womma]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisbrogan.com/?p=3673</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[First and foremost, be very aware that I&#8217;m on the advisory board of IZEA, the first and still most known company selling content marketing including paid blogging posts. I am biased. I am biased. I am biased. There&#8217;s bias in this piece. Are we clear? I have written about content marketing a lot it seems. [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.flickr.com/photos/tedmurphy/3090732443/in/set-72157610884574292/"><img src="http://farm4.static.flickr.com/3095/3090732443_195e89ea09_m.jpg" alt="Ted and Chris" align="left"></a> First and foremost, be <em>very</em> aware that I&#8217;m on the advisory board of <a href="http://www.izea.com" target="_blank">IZEA</a>, the first and still most known company selling content marketing including paid blogging posts. I am biased. I am biased. I am biased. There&#8217;s bias in this piece. Are we clear? </p>
<p>I have written about <a href="http://www.chrisbrogan.com/how-content-marketing-will-shake-the-tree/">content marketing</a> a <a href="http://www.chrisbrogan.com/content-marketing-upshifts-behind-the-jpg-purchase/">lot</a> <a href="http://www.chrisbrogan.com/the-tricky-path-of-brand-relationships/">it</a> <a href="http://www.chrisbrogan.com/tag/contentmarketing">seems</a>. Heck, I&#8217;ve built part of my company on the idea that it&#8217;s what comes next. </p>
<p>I support <a href="http://tedmurphy.org/post/43856657/damn-andy-wishes-he-thought-of-that" target="_blank">Ted Murphy</a> and IZEA. I support their intent to deliver quality content marketing with appropriate disclosure and clear delineation. That&#8217;s why I joined the advisory board. I want to help shape the way I feel content marketing should work. I want to be clear on disclosure. I want to help shape how this impacts blogging, and be sure that we keep all the various iterations for how and why people blog clear. </p>
<p>Reading <a href="http://www.damniwish.com/2009/04/why-its-wrong-to-pay-for-blog-posts-2.html" target="_blank">this post</a> by Andy Sernowitz (who I also like and whose book is a must-read) is a bit disheartening. Specifically, I take issue with this: </p>
<p>
<blockquote>
3. In my personal opinion, working with IZEA, PayPerPost, and Magpie is horrible. You risk public humiliation for yourself and your company. Turn their salespeople away at the door. </p></blockquote>
<p>
My first complaint: the word &#8220;horrible.&#8221; You may have a professional opinion, but &#8220;horrible&#8221; is putting a weighted opinion on a business who chooses to do things differently than your perspective. Sponsored content has been around for quite a while in other mediums. We&#8217;ve only had a few years of it in the blogging space, and as such, it&#8217;s required a bit of a learning curve. To blanket the practice with &#8220;horrible&#8221; is a bit too dismissive to me. </p>
<p>The case studies that came out of the IZEA projects for Sears and K-Mart report somewhat different findings than &#8220;public humiliation.&#8221; The Forrester report that came out in favor of sponsored posts (or at least cautiously optimistic) seems to feel the same way. </p>
<p>Another company that I feel is doing great work in content marketing is <a href="http://www.federatedmedia.net">Federated Media</a>. I&#8217;m quite excited by what they&#8217;re doing with AMEX Open, and some of the other projects they&#8217;ve launched. And again, it&#8217;s sponsored content versus otherwise. </p>
<p>
<h3>It&#8217;s Going There</h3>
<p>Did you read about <a href="http://www.chrisbrogan.com/the-real-meat-of-the-question/">The Ford Fiesta Movement</a>? That&#8217;s sponsored marketing, too. I have a feeling it&#8217;s going to go well. </p>
<p>To me, it&#8217;s just ridiculously simple: disclose. Disclose. Disclose.</p>
<p>Ted Murphy put together <a href="http://www.disclosurepolicy.org/" target="_blank">DisclosurePolicy.org</a> to have a conversation about best practices. Andy Sernovitz has his <a href="http://blogcouncil.org/disclosure/" target="_blank">own take</a> on it. Great. We agree that disclosure is important. </p>
<p>
<h3>Kumbaya All You Want</h3>
<p>
Markets are conversations. Join the conversation. Here we are talking. Yep. </p>
<p>There are MANY great blogs that don&#8217;t give a rat&#8217;s ass about this sponsored post discussion and they shouldn&#8217;t. Want to read some excellent blogs? Read Jon&#8217;s <a href="http://300wordsaday.com/" target="_blank">300 Words a Day</a> or Ann&#8217;s <a href="http://www.annhandley.com" target="_blank">Ann Archy</a>. I&#8217;m not talking about blogging having to switch over to being a marketing circus. </p>
<p>Here&#8217;s what I believe: I believe that what came before, marketing and PR and business communications as they were practiced, don&#8217;t work exactly the same way now. Now, I could be totally wrong. I&#8217;m not a professional marketer or PR person. I don&#8217;t have a degree in either. But it&#8217;s probably better that way. I don&#8217;t have the same bias as others. I see tools and I see ways to use them to build business relationships. </p>
<p>I think that quality content, paid for or otherwise, is the current cost of entry for business communications. If you want me to love your widgets, I have to know they&#8217;re there, and I probably have to experience them in some way. I can blend up some iPhones or I can loan out a hundred cars for people to schmuck about in, but one way or another, I&#8217;m going to have to do something interesting to catch your attention. </p>
<p>Then, once I&#8217;ve got your attention, I&#8217;d better hope that a good level of word of mouth (digital or otherwise) is in place to influence the relationship even more. One won&#8217;t work out there and alone without the other. </p>
<p>
<h3>Is It Really More Difficult Than This?</h3>
<p>
But which is marketing and which is PR and which is paid versus earned and all that? It&#8217;s <em>so</em> simple: </p>
<p>If you paid money for any part of the relationship, even if that money is in dispensing of products for review or the like, disclose it. A gift card or a loaner car or an airplane trip is the same as cash to the disclosure. Keep a disclosure section alive and well anywhere that these experiences take place. Be clear to the relationships that happen. </p>
<p>Is there more to it than that? </p>
<p>
<h3>The Future</h3>
<p>
I really hope that more people pay attention and weigh in on the relationships here. I hope that Ted and Andy and others in the fray merit your thoughts and your consideration. If you&#8217;re a business, you <em>will</em> face the possibility of content marketing and sponsored posts as a potential way to build relationships. If you&#8217;re a media maker, you&#8217;ve already wondered what it means to you. </p>
<p>Let&#8217;s see that this stays an open conversation, with more than just knee-jerk reactions and holier-than-thou opinions. This relates to people&#8217;s business. It relates to <em>my</em> business. What&#8217;s your take on it all? </p>
<p>What are you feeling? What do you think it means for your business or your media making? What comes next? </p>
<p><em>Photo credit, <a href="http://www.flickr.com/photos/tedmurphy/3090732443/in/set-72157610884574292/">Ted Murphy</a></em></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.chrisbrogan.com/i-support-the-future-of-sponsored-posts/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>168</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

