<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>chrisbrogan.com&#187; engagement</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.chrisbrogan.com/tag/engagement/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.chrisbrogan.com</link>
	<description>Learn How Human Business Works - Beyond Social Media</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 06 Feb 2012 09:30:05 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Dear ESPN- You&#8217;re Doing it Wrong</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisbrogan.com/dear-espn-youre-doing-it-wrong/</link>
		<comments>http://www.chrisbrogan.com/dear-espn-youre-doing-it-wrong/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 04 Aug 2009 23:41:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>ceb</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Article]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[engagement]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[espn]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[presence]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[twitter]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[youredoingitwrong]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisbrogan.com/?p=4206</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Thanks to a comment by @tdhurst, I saw this post on NPR by (who knows, because NPR&#8217;s blog doesn&#8217;t show authors) saying that ESPN has announced they don&#8217;t want their employees using Twitter for anything but ESPN-specific stuff. That&#8217;s not how relationship-building goes in the social web. You can use your robot feeds to blurt [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.flickr.com/photos/lukes/2179136179/"><img src="http://farm3.static.flickr.com/2261/2179136179_d77f65affe_m.jpg" alt="empty stadium" align="left" ></a> Thanks to a comment by <a href="http://www.twitter.com/tdhurst">@tdhurst</a>, I saw <a href="http://www.npr.org/blogs/alltechconsidered/2009/08/what_do_the_marines_and_espn_h.html">this post on NPR</a> by (who knows, because NPR&#8217;s blog doesn&#8217;t show authors) saying that ESPN has announced they don&#8217;t want their employees using Twitter for anything but ESPN-specific stuff. </p>
<p>That&#8217;s not how relationship-building goes in the social web. You can use your robot feeds to blurt out posts and showtimes and stuff, but if you want connectivity to people, engagement to your content, and a sense of participation on the social web, making people only talk about ESPN is a quick one-way ticket to &#8220;who cares?&#8221; </p>
<p>It&#8217;s two-way, ESPN. That means we talk with each other about non-work stuff, and that gets us interested in work stuff. Want some great samples? </p>
<p>@newmediajim &#8211; talks about his travels and life, and oh yeah, he makes NBC cool.<br />
@scobleizer &#8211; works at Rackspace, but we don&#8217;t have to talk data centers all day.<br />
@georgegsmithjr &#8211; works at Crocs, but I&#8217;ve never yet talked to him about a shoe, and yet, I support him.<br />
@cbarger &#8211; talks about stuff other than General Motors<br />
@ckieff &#8211; talks about stuff other than Ripple6<br />
@jetblue &#8211; makes the occasional off-airline joke. (Morgan keeps it pretty JetBlue-y).</p>
<p>Look at your own vertical: @the_real_shaq is human and approachable. So are many of the other sports stars. </p>
<p>Please reconsider, ESPN. I hear your engagement levels crying out. </p>
<p><em>Photo credit <a href="http://www.flickr.com/photos/lukes/2179136179/">luked</a></em></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.chrisbrogan.com/dear-espn-youre-doing-it-wrong/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>72</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Engagement Starts With Asking</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisbrogan.com/engagement-starts-with-asking/</link>
		<comments>http://www.chrisbrogan.com/engagement-starts-with-asking/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 04 Aug 2009 14:10:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>ceb</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Article]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[emailmarketing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[engagement]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[howto]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[marketing]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisbrogan.com/?p=4202</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I asked everyone who receives my email newsletter for their opinion yesterday. So far, almost 600 people have replied (there are another 147 downloading to my inbox this morning). I am so thrilled with the response, which is about 10% (think about that for a moment: I&#8217;m pleased that 10% replied &#8211; most open and [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I asked everyone who receives my <a href="http://www.chrisbrogan.com/newsletters">email newsletter</a> for their opinion yesterday. So far, almost 600 people have replied (there are another 147 downloading to my inbox this morning). I am so thrilled with the response, which is about 10% (think about that for a moment: I&#8217;m pleased that 10% replied &#8211; most open and response rates are even lower!). But how does that come about? If you&#8217;re email marketing, how do you go from pushing out content to building relationships?</p>
<p>In my case, I shoot for being as personal as I can. I write as if I&#8217;m writing only to you. I ask you questions where I&#8217;m genuinely interested in your answer. It&#8217;s the only way I know <em>how</em> to do it. I can&#8217;t imagine just lobbing news. </p>
<p>But there are other ways to get it done. Peter Shankman has <a href="http://www.helpareporter.com">HARO</a>, (Help A Reporter Out), where he&#8217;s built a place for several people to ask for help. The people receiving the letter (like me) scan it to see if they can be helpful. It&#8217;s a really clever little system. </p>
<p>In all our efforts to reach out to people and do business, sometimes the magic formula is no harder than this: </p>
<p>Ask a question you really want to hear answers to, and then respond. </p>
<p>The trick is knowing that the people receiving your communications really care about the information you&#8217;re sharing. But then, that&#8217;s another whole conversation, isn&#8217;t it? </p>
<p>Where are you engaged? How do people get you connected to them? </p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.chrisbrogan.com/engagement-starts-with-asking/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>20</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Guest Post- Measuring Shared Engagement</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisbrogan.com/guest-post-measuring-shared-engagement/</link>
		<comments>http://www.chrisbrogan.com/guest-post-measuring-shared-engagement/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 02 Oct 2008 05:29:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>ceb</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Article]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[buzzgain]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[engagement]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[guestpost]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[measurement]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[mukundmohan]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[socialmediameasurement]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisbrogan.com/?p=2832</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Mukund Mohan from BuzzGain has been really thinking deeply about measurement and how it applies to social media. How to measure “shared” engagement with your social media effort Measuring to improve is a very important part of getting better. Since many metrics and modalities exist its important to classify engagement and put specific measures in [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><em>Mukund Mohan from <a href="http://news.buzzgain.com/" target="_blank">BuzzGain</a> has been really thinking deeply about measurement and how it applies to social media. </em></p>
<h3>How to measure “shared” engagement with your social media effort</h3>
<p>Measuring to improve is a very important part of getting better. Since many metrics and modalities exist its important to classify engagement and put specific measures in place to track and monitor them. This post will give you one set of measures to answer the question “How do we measure the value when someone “Digg”&#8217;s a post or they share your blog post on “delicious”? Or how many extended users does someone who participates on these networks actually influence?</p>
<p><a href="http://sharethis.com/index">Share this</a> provides 46 different properties for your user to share their content with others. This includes 10 blogs platforms, social networks, 36 social sharing sites, and many email applications. Using BuzzGain we tracked the “engagement” of 7 different social media properties (Flickr, Twitter, YouTube, Delicious, StumbleUpon, FriendFeed and Digg) for 2 months (July and August 2008) to quantify 2 simple metrics. <strong>How many users actually exist and how many of them are engaged?</strong></p>
<p>Percentage of engaged users on various Web 2.0 / Social Media properties: (Red is the “engaged” users, Blue – registered users)</p>
<p><img src="http://docs.google.com/a/chrisbrogan.com/File?id=dd6dkvt9_8dps8p9hs_b" alt="" width="407" height="345" align="left" /></p>
<p class="western" style="margin-bottom: 0in;"><span style="font-size: x-small;"><span style="font-family: Arial,sans-serif;">I<img src="http://docs.google.com/a/chrisbrogan.com/File?id=dd6dkvt9_9gtw3zhf2_b" alt="" width="408" height="316" align="left" /><br />
</span></span></p>
<p class="western" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<p class="western" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<p class="western" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<p class="western" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<p class="western" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<p class="western" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<p class="western" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<p class="western" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<p class="western" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<p class="western" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<p class="western" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<p class="western" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<p class="western" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<p class="western" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<p class="western" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<p class="western" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<p class="western" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<p class="western" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<p class="western" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<p class="western" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<p class="western" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<p class="western" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<p>In most of these properties we classified a user that has commented / shared / Dugg / “liked” on these as an engaged user. The graph shows that the least engaged was at 1.75% (YouTube) of their user base to the most engaged, nearly 20% (Twitter) of their user base (which is consistent <a href="http://www.useit.com/alertbox/participation_inequality.html">with other studies</a>). We did not count users who “viewed” a video as engaged users. Only those that commented on a story or voted a video up / down. One could argue that YouTube viewers are engaged and the numbers would be skewed differently then.</p>
<p>YouTube, Delicious and Flickr have the most users from 40+ Million to 5.7 Million. The highest engagement platforms were Friendfeed and Twitter. Not really surprising if you are users of those two solutions.</p>
<p>What we found and how can you use this?</p>
<ol>
<li> Pick any influencer on any network mentioned above. Find the number of users they have (e.g. <a href="http://twitter.com/jowyang">Jeremiah Owyang</a> has 12644 “followers on Twitter”  or <a href="http://delicious.com/network/chrisbrogan">Chris Brogan</a> has 282 followers on delicious). 	The rule of thumb is to then apply the engagement metric for that social property to get the “effective influenced users”. So by that measure, Jeremiah&#8217;s effective “engaged” users on Twitter is 2402 and Chris&#8217;s effective “engaged” users 	on Delicious is 22.
</li>
<li>Users 	are most engaged on Twitter and Friendfeed (% of users willing and able to retweet or “Like a post” or comment on a post)
</li>
<li>If you are looking for a combination of large numbers &#038; time spent(or effort) then delicious is the best solution by a YouTube video.
</li>
</ol>
<p><strong>Caution</strong>: This makes the assumption that many people that “follow” someone on twitter or “follow” on delicious are actual users, not “facebook friends” or “bots”. This is purely a rough guide and I would caution you against using these as definitive numbers until we do a second level revision, but it at least gives you a starting point for discussion.  This also does not actually tell you about audience size (how many people actually came to your website because your post got Dugg or Tweeted, which we will discuss next time.</p>
<p>A second level revision of this analysis will include different types of engagement in detail – primary vs. secondary (e.g. Favorite a tweet vs. Retweet, etc)  and also take into account “time” as a critical measure of propagation. That means when a user is on twitter, how many other users are on twitter at the same time so the relevance of sharing (being mostly time bound) is factored.</p>
<p>P.S. We did track blogs (WordPress, Blogger, Typepad), Wikipedia and Social Networks (Myspace and Orkut only, since Facebook is relatively closed) but are still trying to discern the engagement metrics.</p>
<p>P.P.S. If you liked this post, please digg it, cos&#8217; Chris would then let us come back and guest post again. </p>
<p><em>Mukund Mohan is hard at work measuring and thinking at <a href="http://www.buzzgain.com" target="_blank">BuzzGain</a>.</em></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.chrisbrogan.com/guest-post-measuring-shared-engagement/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>25</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>AideRSS Takes a Stab At Measuring Engagement</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisbrogan.com/aiderss-takes-a-stab-at-measuring-engagement/</link>
		<comments>http://www.chrisbrogan.com/aiderss-takes-a-stab-at-measuring-engagement/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 09 Jul 2008 18:30:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>ceb</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Promotion]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[aiderss]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[engagement]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[metrics]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisbrogan.com/?p=2640</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Interesting post from AideRSS&#8216;s community manager Melanie Baker about how blogs measure engagement. I was ranked #1, and for that, I&#8217;m grateful, but I&#8217;m still working out the logic and thinking about what she had to say. Melanie&#8217;s right, though. Bloggers love metrics. Why? Because most of us don&#8217;t get paid to write. We do [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://blog.aiderss.com/2008/07/08/storytelling-roi-social-engagement-metrics-for-marketing-social-media-bloggers/">Interesting post</a> from <a href="http://aiderss.com">AideRSS</a>&#8216;s community manager Melanie Baker about how blogs measure engagement. I was ranked #1, and for that, I&#8217;m grateful, but I&#8217;m still working out the logic and thinking about what she had to say. Melanie&#8217;s right, though. Bloggers love metrics. Why? Because most of us don&#8217;t get paid to write. We do it for love and the desire to connect. Metrics tell us whether we&#8217;re connecting. </p>
<p>Anyhow, the findings are interesting, and I think worth checking out. </p>
<p><a href="http://blog.aiderss.com/2008/07/08/storytelling-roi-social-engagement-metrics-for-marketing-social-media-bloggers/">Storytelling ROI &#8211; Social Engagement Metrics for Marketing Social Media Bloggers</a><br />
<h6 class="zemanta-related-title" style="font-size: 1em;">Related articles by Zemanta</h6>
<ul class="zemanta-article-ul">
<li class="zemanta-article-ul-li"><a href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/new_study_shows_best_and_worst.php">Want That Post to Go Popular? Here&#8217;s The Best and Worst Times to Post It</a></li>
<li class="zemanta-article-ul-li"><a href="http://www.blogherald.com/2008/06/25/more-web-services-and-wordpress-plugins-worth-checking-out/">More Web Services and WordPress Plugins Worth Checking Out</a></li>
</ul>
<div style="margin-top: 10px; height: 15px;" class="zemanta-pixie"><a class="zemanta-pixie-a" href="http://reblog.zemanta.com/zemified/4c8dfedd-c44f-4221-aadd-5902354f05fd/" title="Zemified by Zemanta"><img style="border: medium none ; float: right;" class="zemanta-pixie-img" src="http://img.zemanta.com/reblog_e.png?x-id=4c8dfedd-c44f-4221-aadd-5902354f05fd" alt="Zemanta Pixie"></a></div>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.chrisbrogan.com/aiderss-takes-a-stab-at-measuring-engagement/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>3</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

