<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>chrisbrogan.com&#187; facebookconnect</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.chrisbrogan.com/tag/facebookconnect/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.chrisbrogan.com</link>
	<description>Learn How Human Business Works - Beyond Social Media</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 06 Feb 2012 09:30:05 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>How Facebook Connect Points the Way Towards Velvet Rope Networks</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisbrogan.com/how-facebook-connect-points-the-way-towards-velvet-rope-networks/</link>
		<comments>http://www.chrisbrogan.com/how-facebook-connect-points-the-way-towards-velvet-rope-networks/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 02 Mar 2009 18:24:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>ceb</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Article]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[facebookconnect]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[socialnetworks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[velvetrope]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisbrogan.com/?p=3444</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Look at this screen capture from the DEMO Live implementation of Facebook Connect: Make Social Sites Easily With Facebook Connect I&#8217;ve seen similar from CNN.com, from Fancast (client), and others. This integration is happening quite often. I think there&#8217;s something more to it. What&#8217;s been accomplished here is pretty interesting. Facebook is saying &#8220;don&#8217;t bother [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Look at this screen capture from the <a href="http://www.demo.com/live" target="_blank">DEMO Live</a> implementation of Facebook Connect: </p>
<p><a href="http://www.flickr.com/photos/chrisbrogan/3323449698/" title="Demo Live by Chris Brogan, on Flickr"><img src="http://farm4.static.flickr.com/3545/3323449698_0c8e5c0708.jpg" width="500" height="303" alt="Demo Live" /></a>
<p><h3>Make Social Sites Easily With Facebook Connect</h3>
<p>I&#8217;ve seen similar from <a href="http://cnn.com">CNN.com</a>, from <a href="http://www.fancast.com">Fancast</a> (client), and others. This integration is happening quite often. I think there&#8217;s something more to it. </p>
<p>What&#8217;s been accomplished here is pretty interesting. Facebook is saying &#8220;don&#8217;t bother building a social network from the ground up. Just use everyone&#8217;s existing Facebook profile with your special event/project.&#8221; This makes building an event experience really simple, provided that your users are already Facebook customers, and with millions of these, it&#8217;s a more likely event these days. It means, though, that you&#8217;re giving up a lot of information and control (and not in the easiest-to-accept ways). </p>
<p>
<h3>The Drawbacks</h3>
<p>
Though there are advantages to using Facebook Connect for integration, there are some drawbacks, mostly from the marketer&#8217;s point of view. If you build out a social network project using Facebook Connect,  Facebook gets all the information and you get none. You don&#8217;t get a database of users. You don&#8217;t get a way to message people participating in your event, except for &#8220;in stream,&#8221; the way everyone else is using the app. You don&#8217;t have any sense of demographics, nor any control abilities to block trolls or other unwanted types. </p>
<p>
<h3>What I Want Instead</h3>
<p>
Instead of Facebook Connect, where Facebook gets to keep all the data, makes you relinquish all the control, and leaves you with only the &#8220;gooey content center&#8221; on your side of the proposition, I think someone will soon create a &#8220;universal profile.&#8221; This profile will allow me to choose what I expose to whom, with something like a &#8220;profile view&#8221; for various facets of my persona (work, life, clubs, family, etc). Thus, this key (and no, it&#8217;s not exactly <a href="http://www.openid.org" target="_blank">OpenID</a>, but that&#8217;s close) will allow me to slot into various content spaces, not unlike the DEMO conference above, such that the event organizer gets a sense of who I am, and I feel comfy sharing some level of my credentials. </p>
<p>I think Facebook Connect is the first obvious implementation of this. I don&#8217;t think it&#8217;s what really comes out in the long run. Instead, it&#8217;s a good model from which to implement, to improvise, and improve.</p>
<p>What do you think?  </p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.chrisbrogan.com/how-facebook-connect-points-the-way-towards-velvet-rope-networks/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>50</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

