<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>chrisbrogan.com&#187; microblogs</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.chrisbrogan.com/tag/microblogs/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.chrisbrogan.com</link>
	<description>Learn How Human Business Works - Beyond Social Media</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 06 Feb 2012 09:30:05 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Technorati Doesnt Count Microblogs</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisbrogan.com/technorati-doesnt-count-microblogs/</link>
		<comments>http://www.chrisbrogan.com/technorati-doesnt-count-microblogs/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 28 Aug 2008 09:59:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>ceb</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Article]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[friendfeed]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Jaiku]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[microblogs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[pownce]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[technorati]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[twitter]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisbrogan.com/?p=2760</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Something Mack Collier just said rang a bell in my head: Technorati doesn&#8217;t count services like Twitter, Friendfeed, Plurk, Identi.ca, etc, as valid sources of traffic for a blog. Meaning, for the dozens of people who say that they find something interesting and share the link on Twitter, none of that goes towards whether a [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Something <a href="http://moblogsmoproblems.blogspot.com/2008/08/viral-gardens-top-25-marketing-social_27.html">Mack Collier</a> just said rang a bell in my head: <a href="http://www.technorati.com">Technorati</a> doesn&#8217;t count services like Twitter, Friendfeed, Plurk, Identi.ca, etc, as valid sources of traffic for a blog. Meaning, for the dozens of people who say that they find something interesting and share the link on Twitter, none of that goes towards whether a blog is authoritative.</p>
<p>Does that actually make sense? If we&#8217;re shifting as a user base into using services like Facebook, Twitter, and Jaiku more frequently (okay, not Jaiku), why wouldn&#8217;t Technorati, the current reigning source of &#8220;authority&#8221; of blogs on the web, count these sources? </p>
<p>Has Technorati become the Alexa of measurement? </p>
<p>Update: I guess Alexa counts FireFox now, too. Again, if you have the bar installed. Thanks for the update. <strike>(Note: Alexa, as far as I know, only counts users of the IE browser with the Alexa toolbar installed in its ratings of who visits your website, versus <a href="http://www.compete.com">Compete</a> and others who count much more.)</strike></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.chrisbrogan.com/technorati-doesnt-count-microblogs/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>35</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

