<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>chrisbrogan.com&#187; press</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.chrisbrogan.com/tag/press/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.chrisbrogan.com</link>
	<description>Learn How Human Business Works - Beyond Social Media</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 06 Feb 2012 09:30:05 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Look for the Signs- They are Everywhere</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisbrogan.com/look-for-the-signs-they-are-everywhere/</link>
		<comments>http://www.chrisbrogan.com/look-for-the-signs-they-are-everywhere/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 07 Apr 2009 03:20:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>ceb</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Article]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[jeffjarvis]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[journalism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[media]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[press]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[signs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[socialmedia]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[storytelling]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisbrogan.com/?p=3625</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The story isn&#8217;t the story. It&#8217;s what you learn from it. That&#8217;s the secret message here. Jeff Jarvis does it again. This time, he talks about how Arianna Huffington saves journalism. He&#8217;s not wrong. She is front and center of the mindset of people doing new, good, amazing things with journalism. Jarvis knows because he&#8217;s [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.flickr.com/photos/52032399@N00/2743299127/"><img src="http://farm4.static.flickr.com/3291/2743299127_1bee7cfeee_m.jpg" alt="printing press" align="left"></a> The story isn&#8217;t the story. It&#8217;s what you learn from it. That&#8217;s the secret message here.</p>
<p>Jeff Jarvis does it again. This time, he talks about how <a href="http://www.buzzmachine.com/2009/04/06/arianna-huffington-saves-journalism/">Arianna Huffington saves journalism</a>. He&#8217;s not wrong. She is front and center of the mindset of people doing new, good, amazing things with journalism. Jarvis knows because he&#8217;s been screaming and shaking his chalky fists at everyone that things has to change, and then he told everyone what things had to change, and then it was up to you (in this case, &#8220;you&#8221; was journalists and the media).</p>
<p>But the story is about the signs. </p>
<p>
<h3>Are You Watching?</h3>
<p>
Thomas Friedman&#8217;s book, <a href="http://www.amazon.com/gp/product/0312425074?ie=UTF8&#038;tag=chrisbrogan&#038;linkCode=as2&#038;camp=1789&#038;creative=9325&#038;creativeASIN=0312425074" target="_blank" >The World Is Flat</a> told us tons about what was coming next in business. He wrote about value chain disaggregation. He wrote about how things would splinter into components and that we&#8217;d have to hold on to the most valuable part of our various business workstreams, because a lot of it would move off to other places. </p>
<p>How many people made business changes accordingly? </p>
<p>Marketers, are you paying attention to who&#8217;s spending how much and where when you read magazines, watch TV, or see billboards? Are you extrapolating out what it means to you, your business, etc? </p>
<p>
<h3>Expand Your Sources</h3>
<p>
No matter what your business (or whatever your use for social media), look for informational and inspirational sources outside of your main discipline, your vertical, and outside of even simple reason. Find stuff <em>way</em> outside your typical scope, and way far away from your own point of view. </p>
<p>Ask yourself frequently, &#8220;Where does this lead? What could this mean?&#8221; </p>
<p>If you&#8217;re in media, the stories are all around you. The model&#8217;s broken. Yep. The numbers are smaller. Yep. People aren&#8217;t as into paper. Yep. Ads online don&#8217;t make as much money as on paper. Sad, but yep.</p>
<p>Some companies are figuring it out. Others are just paddling forward. </p>
<p>The same is true for many thing: advertising, marketing, big companies versus more flexible companies, and several other things. </p>
<p>We can find signs, and we can decipher what they mean, or we can just shovel entertainment into our heads, and unplug every night. </p>
<p>Am I ranty? A bit. Am I wrong? </p>
<p><em>Photo credit <a href="http://www.flickr.com/photos/52032399@N00/2743299127/">Chimpanz APe</a></em></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.chrisbrogan.com/look-for-the-signs-they-are-everywhere/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>59</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Some Differences Between Pitching Mainstream Press and Bloggers</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisbrogan.com/some-differences-between-pitching-mainstream-press-and-bloggers/</link>
		<comments>http://www.chrisbrogan.com/some-differences-between-pitching-mainstream-press-and-bloggers/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 01 May 2008 03:37:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>ceb</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Article]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[blogging]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[journalism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[marketing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[pr]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[press]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[socialmedia]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[socialnetworking]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisbrogan.com/?p=2502</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Meet the next generation of people who put stories out on the web. I say &#8220;next,&#8221; but blogging has been around for years and years. Some of us are making decent money at it, hiring and employing staffs, etc. Those types seem like mainstream press. But they&#8217;re not. One difference? We blog based on what [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.flickr.com/photos/chrisbrogan/2449956948/" title="Media Makers by Chris Brogan, on Flickr"><img src="http://farm4.static.flickr.com/3012/2449956948_544c72975c.jpg" width="500" height="233" alt="Media Makers" /></a>
<p>Meet the next generation of people who put stories out on the web. I say &#8220;next,&#8221; but blogging has been around for years and years. <a href="http://techcrunch.com">Some</a> <a href="http://gigaom.com">of</a> <a href="http://perezhilton.com">us</a> are making decent money at it, hiring and employing staffs, etc. Those types <em>seem</em> like mainstream press. But <a href="http://huffingtonpost.com">they&#8217;re not</a>. One difference? We blog based on what drives our passion, plus in the case of some folks, what drives revenue. </p>
<p>Blogs have reach. Blogs don&#8217;t have as many barriers to cross before you reach the decision maker. Blogs don&#8217;t (always) require a PR agency to help you get access. Blogs always need good content, right? So it seems like a natural thing to just lob stories at a blogger, because more often than not, they&#8217;re going to be receptive, will run the bit if it fits their readership (viewership), and everyone wins, right? </p>
<p>Some differences. </p>
<h3>Bloggers Often Write From Passion</h3>
<p>Lots of us can&#8217;t NOT blog. We love what we do. We&#8217;re obsessed with getting information out into the world. Desperate to be useful. I&#8217;d say that we&#8217;re like news junkies, only we&#8217;re really interested in how we can contribute to making the news. </p>
<h3>Bloggers Have a Bit More Ego Feeding Required</h3>
<p>Try to disagree with me on that one, but when I just start rattling bloggers&#8217; names down quickly, I can tell you that there are things you&#8217;ll want to do to reach out, and one is to know what makes a certain blogger tick. Want to get into TechCrunch or Mashable? Be sure you&#8217;re giving one the exclusive, and pick wisely. Want to get covered by Engadget? Don&#8217;t give it to Gizmodo on the same day. Go a few tiers down in blogs and what <em>we</em> want is to know that you know who we are, and what we cover. A pitch about something in my general area isn&#8217;t the same as noticing the kinds of things I write about and giving me something that fits. </p>
<h3>Bloggers Like Free Prize Inside Experiences</h3>
<p>If you want us to write about your software app or your new gizmo, give a few away. Nokia, Nikon, Flip, GM (Saturn), Garmin, and tons of other companies have given out gear on loaner programs (sometimes handled well, and other times handled a bit weirdly). And if it&#8217;s not something directly tangible, it&#8217;s something like getting invited to a pre-screening of a movie, or to a closed beta of an application, or something else that makes one feel exclusive. Still an ego play, and yet, very effective because once we play with your toys, we&#8217;ll be inclined to write about them. </p>
<p>Will we be fair and give opinions on the competitors like an official review site? Not always. Depends who it is, whether that&#8217;s part of their bailiwick, and whether they even know how to approach such a thing. I sure don&#8217;t. If I&#8217;m given something free to mess around with, I disclose it when talking about it,  but then, my site isn&#8217;t a journalistic effort to review things fairly. </p>
<h3>Bloggers Don&#8217;t Have To Be Polite</h3>
<p>Though I prefer politeness, and try to be polite often (Sorry, Tom), it&#8217;s not required. And we don&#8217;t always do what you&#8217;d wish. It&#8217;s a little uncertain sometimes what you&#8217;ll get when you send a request to us. Wish it weren&#8217;t true, and I would prefer that we be polite more often, but we don&#8217;t have to be.</p>
<h3>What Twitter Had to Say When I Asked My Friends</h3>
<p>(That&#8217;s a hint, too. We&#8217;re far more networked. We talk to each other. We talk about YOU.) </p>
<p><img src="http://img.skitch.com/20080501-ce6xtkfej7a4e8b4bkg9jarj58.jpg"><br />
<img src="http://img.skitch.com/20080501-t6k56tis437fjj7w9hixw7de43.jpg"><br />
<img src="http://img.skitch.com/20080501-k7sf67g4t2th16kcfg9hpinwim.jpg"></p>
<h3>Pitching ME</h3>
<p>First, I have to say that I&#8217;m not usually on the lookout for a news story. If you read back through my posts, a great many of them deal with strategy and tactics that people can employ. I read about 1000 news items a day, plus I have a day job that isn&#8217;t professional blogging. So, I don&#8217;t always need news.</p>
<p>And yet.</p>
<p>If you&#8217;ve got something interesting about a new tool, a new way that someone&#8217;s using social media to build business or organizational relationships, a sense of what&#8217;s interesting to me and want to feed me something, here&#8217;s what you might do:</p>
<ul>
<li> Be my <a href="http://twitter.com/chrisbrogan">Twitter friend</a>.
<li> Have read my last ten blog posts to have a sense of my flavor.
<li> Give me links, pointers, possibly screenshots, and follow up in about 9 days when I still haven&#8217;t managed to get your story out.
<li> Kindly understand if the story doesn&#8217;t fit what I cover (often).
<li> Realize that I can&#8217;t always check out your website.
<li> Understand that a &#8220;social network for ____&#8221; (dogs, lawyers, imaginary friends, ex-cons) isn&#8217;t really new unless they&#8217;re doing something REALLY new.
<li> Write the first paragraph of your email as if you really did only send it to me (I get it, but pretend, okay?)</ul>
<h3>While We&#8217;re At It</h3>
<p>Here&#8217;s what I *am* really interested in writing more about, and where you can help me, if you&#8217;ve got an interesting story: </p>
<ul>
<li> Social media and network use inside the enterprise. (Spoke at Thomson/Reuters and IBM recently and was really impressed in both cases with what they&#8217;re already doing).
<li> Specialized social network applications &#8211; things that make a network more valuable, vs just profiles, blogs, pictures, and friends.
<li> Books about social media, social networks, next-generation PR/marketing, business, etc.
<li> Business models that aren&#8217;t advertising-centric. (For instance, <a href="http://sermo.com">Sermo</a> has a neat model. So does <a href="http://gimp.tv">Gimp.TV</a>).
<li> Mainstream people coming into social media in a realistic and meaningful way.
<li> Nonprofit and organizational experiences with social media that have made an impact.
<li> Location-based tools and networking (for instance, I&#8217;m digging Yahoo&#8217;s Fire Eagle stuff)
<li> Technology that improves business, that improves personal interfacing with the Internet.
</ul>
<p>I&#8217;m probably forgetting a few of my favorites in there, but let&#8217;s start there. If you&#8217;re pitching something like THAT, drop me a line. My contact info is in the sidebar. I&#8217;m easy to find. </p>
<h3>Further Reading</h3>
<p>Social media expert, Jason Falls <a href="http://www.socialmediaexplorer.com/2008/04/28/how-do-i-get-placement-on-blogs/">covered an advertising professional&#8217;s view</a> on this recently, and that&#8217;s worth checking out, too.  </p>
<p>Edelman&#8217;s superstar, Leah Jones <a href="http://www.edelmandigital.com/blog/2008/03/revisiting_talking_to_bloggers.html">showed us how to talk to bloggers</a>. </p>
<h3>Your Thoughts?</h3>
<p>Lots of people who come here are PR or marketing professionals, journalists, and the like. What do you think about what I&#8217;ve said so far? What are your tales of success with bloggers, or your tales of woe? Bloggers, am I wrong in my starting concepts about what might feel different about bloggers vs mainstream press? I&#8217;m eager for your take. </p>
<p><em>Screen caps made with <a href="http://skitch.com">Skitch</a></em></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.chrisbrogan.com/some-differences-between-pitching-mainstream-press-and-bloggers/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>120</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

