<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>chrisbrogan.com&#187; relevance</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.chrisbrogan.com/tag/relevance/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.chrisbrogan.com</link>
	<description>Learn How Human Business Works - Beyond Social Media</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 06 Feb 2012 09:30:05 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Are Blog Search Services Less Relevant Than Traditional Search</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisbrogan.com/are-blog-search-services-less-relevant-than-traditional-search/</link>
		<comments>http://www.chrisbrogan.com/are-blog-search-services-less-relevant-than-traditional-search/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 20 Aug 2008 20:30:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>ceb</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Promotion]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[google]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[relevance]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[search]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisbrogan.com/?p=2735</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Very interesting results blogged by Mukund Mohan about blog search relevance. He did a search in several notable blog search tools for &#8220;chris brogan&#8221; minus the quotes, and found less-than-stellar results. In the comments, you&#8217;ll see that I incorrectly recreated his search and did a little better, but it was still interesting to note. Further, [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://flickr.com/photos/u2canreed/500321556/"><img src="http://farm1.static.flickr.com/217/500321556_cef4763dd1_m.jpg" alt="searching" align="left"></a> Very interesting results blogged by Mukund Mohan about <a href="http://news.buzzgain.com/?p=11">blog search relevance</a>. He did a search in several notable blog search tools for &#8220;chris brogan&#8221; minus the quotes, and found less-than-stellar results. In the comments, you&#8217;ll see that I incorrectly recreated his search and did a little better, but it was still interesting to note. </p>
<p>Further, I feel that Google search, regular google versus their blog search, has really stepped up lately. I&#8217;ve been using that to find old posts when someone asks me for information. Yahoo and Ask aren&#8217;t so bad either. </p>
<p>So this is a shift from what I often advise people, with regards to finding relevant blogs. Should I be recommending straight up Google instead of the search tools? I&#8217;m starting to think so.</p>
<p>What&#8217;s your take? </p>
<p><em>photo credit, <a href="http://flickr.com/photos/u2canreed/500321556/">reedbiotch</a></em></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.chrisbrogan.com/are-blog-search-services-less-relevant-than-traditional-search/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>29</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

