<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>chrisbrogan.com&#187; rssreader</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.chrisbrogan.com/tag/rssreader/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.chrisbrogan.com</link>
	<description>Learn How Human Business Works - Beyond Social Media</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 06 Feb 2012 09:30:05 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Greasemonkey Script Adds In-Line Site Rendering for Google Reader</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisbrogan.com/google-reader-adds-in-line-site-rendering/</link>
		<comments>http://www.chrisbrogan.com/google-reader-adds-in-line-site-rendering/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 29 Jan 2008 13:08:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>ceb</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Article]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[feedreader]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[google]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[googlereader]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[greasemonkey]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[rss]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[rssreader]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://chrisbrogan.com/google-reader-adds-in-line-site-rendering/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Uploaded with plasq&#8216;s Skitch! Turns out I was completely wrong. I reported earlier today (deleted to avoid confusion) that Google Reader added some new functionality. Whoops. It was a Greasemonkey script Firefox add-on called Better GReader. Google Reader&#8217;s engineer commented below saying I&#8217;m wrong. He&#8217;s right. Reminds me of something I say often: how WE [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div class="thumbnail"><a href="http://skitch.com/chrisbrogan/fq2x/greader"><img src="http://img.skitch.com/20080129-q2f1kqrbwtr3me94ws8mc8njy1.preview.jpg" alt="gReader" /></a><br /><span style="font-family: Lucida Grande, Trebuchet, sans-serif, Helvetica, Arial; font-size: 10px; color: #808080">Uploaded with <a href="http://plasq.com/">plasq</a>&#8216;s <a href="http://skitch.com">Skitch</a>!</span></div>
<p>Turns out I was completely wrong. I reported earlier today (deleted to avoid confusion) that Google Reader added some new functionality. Whoops. It was a <a href="https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/748">Greasemonkey</a> script Firefox add-on called <a href="http://lifehacker.com/software/exclusive-lifehacker-download/trick-out-google-reader-with-better-greader-262020.php">Better GReader</a>. </p>
<p>Google Reader&#8217;s engineer commented below saying I&#8217;m wrong. He&#8217;s right. </p>
<p>Reminds me of something I say often: how WE see the Web isn&#8217;t always how everyone sees the web. </p>
<p>Sorry for crying wolf. </p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.chrisbrogan.com/google-reader-adds-in-line-site-rendering/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>29</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

