<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>chrisbrogan.com&#187; stephenhodson</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.chrisbrogan.com/tag/stephenhodson/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.chrisbrogan.com</link>
	<description>Learn How Human Business Works - Beyond Social Media</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 06 Feb 2012 09:30:05 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Tagging And Metadata and Why Bother</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisbrogan.com/tagging-and-metadata-and-why-bother/</link>
		<comments>http://www.chrisbrogan.com/tagging-and-metadata-and-why-bother/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 Jan 2008 03:31:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>ceb</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Article]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[blogging]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[folksonomy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[howto]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[information]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[metadata]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[stephenhodson]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[tagging]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[tags]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://chrisbrogan.com/tagging-and-metadata-and-why-bother/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Steven Hodson wrote a post that got me thinking. He was asking whether bloggers used tagging in their posts to extend the conversation by encouraging people in via search. I looked at my Google Analytics, and it turned out that traffic coming to my site via Technorati style tags was the 21st potential way someone [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://flickr.com/photos/kid_pro_quo/3042712an32/"><img src="http://farm1.static.flickr.com/115/304271232_5b8d90f1d0_m.jpg" alt="bumperstickers" align="right"></a> Steven Hodson <a href="http://www.winextra.com/2008/01/21/is-it-really-about-the-conversation/">wrote a post</a>  that got me thinking. He was asking whether bloggers used <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tag_%28metadata%29">tagging</a> in their posts to extend the conversation by encouraging people in via search. I looked at my Google Analytics, and it turned out that traffic coming to my site via <a href="http://technorati.com">Technorati</a> style tags was the 21st potential way someone was coming to my site. </p>
<p>Thus my question: why bother tagging? Here are my thoughts on the answer: </p>
<p>Tags are a way of adding a layer of <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Metadata">metadata</a> onto something one has placed on the web. We tag photos in <a href="http://flickr.com">Flickr</a>, for organizing, for giving labels to images, to help computers see them. We tag blog posts, songs, profile information, and all kinds of other things. Why? </p>
<p>In his book, <a href="http://www.amazon.com/gp/product/0805080430?ie=UTF8&#038;tag=chrisbrogan&#038;linkCode=as2&#038;camp=1789&#038;creative=9325&#038;creativeASIN=0805080430">Everything Is Miscellaneous</a>, David Weinberger talks about the need for tagging growing out of an ever more complex collection of bookmarks. It became a different way to organize information. And it is. When I search through my <a href="http://del.icio.us/chrisbrogan">social bookmarks</a>, I often don&#8217;t remember the names of the sites I&#8217;m searching for. Instead, I remember the topic I came up with to remind me where to look. </p>
<p>This kind of <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Folksonomy">folksonomy</a> becomes useful, because it means that even if YOU call something a great &#8220;Thought Leader Program,&#8221; I might call it &#8220;weblearning,&#8221; and leave it at that. Meaning, we don&#8217;t have to agree on how to file something in a world with tags. You say to-MAY-to, and I say to-MAH-to. (Add two strips of <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bacn_(electronic)">bacn</a> and some lettuce, and we&#8217;re a sandwich!)</p>
<p><strong>Why YOU Should Tag</strong></p>
<p>Helping people understand your content is important. If at all possible, spend time tagging the content you make so that others might find it in a search. Think about how THEY will look for it, and label your tags accordingly. Don&#8217;t worry so much abou how your people actually want the data. They can use del.icio.us and other tools to re-tag it their own way. But help out in a starter set. </p>
<p>I&#8217;m going to tag my stuff because I want to make sure I can find it again. My categories were decided long ago on my blog site, and they&#8217;re not especially helpful. My tags? Not bad. </p>
<p>What about you? What are you doing with tagging? How have you built your tags in the past? What are your thoughts on how they reflect on your media?</p>
<p><em>The Social Media 100 is a project by Chris Brogan dedicated to writing 100 useful blog posts in a row about the tools, techniques, and strategies behind using social media for your business, your organization, or your own personal interests. Swing by <a href="http://chrisbrogan.com">[chrisbrogan.com]</a> for more posts in the series, and if you have topic ideas, feel free to share them, as this is a group project, and your opinion matters. </p>
<p>Get the entire series by <a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/chrisbrogandotcom">subscribing to this blog</a>, and subscribe to my free newsletter <a href="http://chrisbrogan.com/newsletters">here</a>.</em></p>
<p><em>Photo Credit, <a href="http://flickr.com/photos/kid_pro_quo/3042712an32/">Allan Ferguson</a></em></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.chrisbrogan.com/tagging-and-metadata-and-why-bother/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>50</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

