<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>chrisbrogan.com&#187; techcrunch</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.chrisbrogan.com/tag/techcrunch/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.chrisbrogan.com</link>
	<description>Learn How Human Business Works - Beyond Social Media</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 06 Feb 2012 09:30:05 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Cuil Misses Me</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisbrogan.com/cuil-misses-me/</link>
		<comments>http://www.chrisbrogan.com/cuil-misses-me/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 28 Jul 2008 04:37:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>ceb</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[review]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[cuil]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[search]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[searchengines]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[techcrunch]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisbrogan.com/?p=2680</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I just tried out Cuil, which is supposed to be amazing and better search engine, and what not (that&#8217;s what they told Mike Arrington). But it didn&#8217;t work for me. I searched on &#8220;Chris Brogan&#8221; and found all kinds of relevant info, including random pictures not related to the text results beside the search, and [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://cuil.com"><img src="http://img.skitch.com/20080728-trmiuu9s7iiiusg1ww47s9fyn8.jpg" alt="cuil search engine" align="right"></a> I just tried out <a href="http://cuil.com">Cuil</a>, which is supposed to be amazing and better search engine, and what not (that&#8217;s what they told <a href="http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/07/27/cuill-launches-a-massive-search-engine/">Mike Arrington</a>). But it didn&#8217;t work for me. </p>
<p>I searched on &#8220;Chris Brogan&#8221; and found all kinds of relevant info, including random pictures not related to the text results beside the search, and none of them my main URL. </p>
<p>I searched on &#8220;chrisbrogan.com&#8221; and it couldn&#8217;t find my URL. </p>
<p>I searched on &#8220;chrisbrogan&#8221; and it found a bunch of social networks where I&#8217;ve used that username.</p>
<p>Call me egotistical, but if you can&#8217;t find yourself in a search engine after a decade of littering the web with your presence, I&#8217;m thinking it&#8217;s not much of a search engine. </p>
<p><a href="http://www.kqzyfj.com/1q98hz74z6MQNPOONQMONRRVOUW" target="_top" onmouseover="window.status='http://www.ringcentral.com';return true;" onmouseout="window.status=' ';return true;"><br />
<img src="http://www.tqlkg.com/ch103snrflj4857665846599D6CE" alt="Grow your business with RingCentral" border="0"/></a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.chrisbrogan.com/cuil-misses-me/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>208</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Comments and Why RSS Is Not Enough</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisbrogan.com/comments-and-why-rss-is-not-enough/</link>
		<comments>http://www.chrisbrogan.com/comments-and-why-rss-is-not-enough/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 18 Feb 2008 18:04:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>ceb</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[comments]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[davewiner]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[rss]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[techcrunch]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://chrisbrogan.com/comments-and-why-rss-is-not-enough/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Hopefully, someone amazing like Dave Winer will come along and explain to me(us) where this is going. I dipped into a TechCrunch post to see what people had to say about a recent post, and realized that the comments there are just as important as the posts most time. Sounds like how I feel about [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://skitch.com/chrisbrogan/gqx7/comments"><img src="http://img.skitch.com/20080218-c43cefif8732t2r6uh5w79hyy9.preview.jpg" alt="Comments" align="left"/></a>Hopefully, someone amazing like <a href="http://scripting.com">Dave Winer</a> will come along and explain to me(us) where this is going. </p>
<p>I dipped into a <a href="http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/02/17/fred-wilsons-conflicted-doublespeak/">TechCrunch post</a> to see what people had to say about a recent post, and realized that the comments there are just as important as the posts most time. Sounds like how I feel about here, right? </p>
<p>My thought is that RSS as a communications medium, while being wholly responsible for all the good and wonderful and magical things that have come to the web over the last 5 or 6 years, might need an upgrade. Why? Because I want the comment flow. I want to be part of the back and forth of the conversation under the hood. </p>
<p>Yes, I understand that some blogging platforms have a separate RSS feed for comments, but is that the right solution to the problem? I don&#8217;t think so. I think it has to be something more robust, and maybe with a toggle. </p>
<p>What&#8217;s your take? Just as I&#8217;m telling people to use RSS readers to absorb their blogs and podcasts and the like, I&#8217;m thinking that the experience of the original site, especially in the comments department, is important to the larger media picture. True? Wrong? </p>
<p>(Think of this as a thought in process that I hope others will improve with their own opinions). </p>
<p>Pictures uploaded with <a href="http://plasq.com/">plasq</a>&#8216;s <a href="http://skitch.com">Skitch</a>. </p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.chrisbrogan.com/comments-and-why-rss-is-not-enough/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>44</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

