<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The Matter of Scale</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.chrisbrogan.com/the-matter-of-scale/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.chrisbrogan.com/the-matter-of-scale/</link>
	<description>Learn How Human Business Works - Beyond Social Media</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 22 Mar 2010 16:12:47 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Jen Zingsheim</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisbrogan.com/the-matter-of-scale/comment-page-1/#comment-143394</link>
		<dc:creator>Jen Zingsheim</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 29 Oct 2008 16:31:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisbrogan.com/?p=2873#comment-143394</guid>
		<description>A little late to the party here, but still think it&#039;s worth commenting...Kami Huyse of Communication Overtones and I, along with Susan Getgood, were having this very discussion back in August. I consider scalability social media&#039;s weakest point, ( http://is.gd/1U1L ). It&#039;s going to be interesting to see how communicators and PR pros approach the high-touch need of social media with reduced budgets, fewer staffers, etc. that are (or will be) a product of the economic downturn.

Jen</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A little late to the party here, but still think it&#8217;s worth commenting&#8230;Kami Huyse of Communication Overtones and I, along with Susan Getgood, were having this very discussion back in August. I consider scalability social media&#8217;s weakest point, ( <a href="http://is.gd/1U1L" rel="nofollow">http://is.gd/1U1L</a> ). It&#8217;s going to be interesting to see how communicators and PR pros approach the high-touch need of social media with reduced budgets, fewer staffers, etc. that are (or will be) a product of the economic downturn.</p>
<p>Jen</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Doug Haslam &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Social Media Top 5: The Scarlet Letter B</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisbrogan.com/the-matter-of-scale/comment-page-1/#comment-142572</link>
		<dc:creator>Doug Haslam &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Social Media Top 5: The Scarlet Letter B</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 24 Oct 2008 21:57:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisbrogan.com/?p=2873#comment-142572</guid>
		<description>[...] Brogan talks in detail about scaling social networks in this detailed post. Can social networks scale? Aren&#8217;t these supposed to be personalized interactions, and any [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Brogan talks in detail about scaling social networks in this detailed post. Can social networks scale? Aren&#8217;t these supposed to be personalized interactions, and any [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Scott Dodds</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisbrogan.com/the-matter-of-scale/comment-page-1/#comment-142252</link>
		<dc:creator>Scott Dodds</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 23 Oct 2008 17:21:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisbrogan.com/?p=2873#comment-142252</guid>
		<description>I think the answer is that to scale community you need to bring more people up to the conversational level. A blog is very much a broadcast medium, One speaking to and interacting with Many. Find a way to move your conversation to a realm where members can converse with each other and more voices are heard. As it is with so much of social media, the best way to scale is to engage your members as part of the solution.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think the answer is that to scale community you need to bring more people up to the conversational level. A blog is very much a broadcast medium, One speaking to and interacting with Many. Find a way to move your conversation to a realm where members can converse with each other and more voices are heard. As it is with so much of social media, the best way to scale is to engage your members as part of the solution.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Brian Ellefritz</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisbrogan.com/the-matter-of-scale/comment-page-1/#comment-142148</link>
		<dc:creator>Brian Ellefritz</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 22 Oct 2008 23:00:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisbrogan.com/?p=2873#comment-142148</guid>
		<description>And let&#039;s not forget the drab consequences of the FEAR of not scaling:  not trying.  I think companies will find their equilibrium over time but I&#039;ve seen many team simply not make the effort because they don&#039;t want to fail along the way by not being able to attend to the inquiries and needs of the community.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>And let&#8217;s not forget the drab consequences of the FEAR of not scaling:  not trying.  I think companies will find their equilibrium over time but I&#8217;ve seen many team simply not make the effort because they don&#8217;t want to fail along the way by not being able to attend to the inquiries and needs of the community.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bobby Ozuna</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisbrogan.com/the-matter-of-scale/comment-page-1/#comment-142082</link>
		<dc:creator>Bobby Ozuna</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 22 Oct 2008 15:18:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisbrogan.com/?p=2873#comment-142082</guid>
		<description>I think you have to consider a LARGE audience each time you post, but share material that is (or seems to be) on the one-to-one (personal) level. If you post in a personal manner that seems to speak to each individual reader...then you are both, touching the individual aspect, but for a larger, broad audience. I think even when you post to a group of 1000+ readers...you can maintain the personal (one-to-one) feel by commenting back to each reader who responds and addressing them each.... You will NEVER be able to attend to each reader when you begin to gain a greater reader base....but you can at least give the impression that you are willing to communicate with each reader as it applies... and that I believe is honest enough to keep readers coming back...

It&#039;s a hard thing to do. I know...this year I went from 20 readers per week to 50+ readers per day...not LARGE scale compared to sites like yours but a definite change in communication and approach from a personal blogging perspective.

~Bobby Ozuna
&lt;a href=&quot;http://inotauthor.blogspot.com&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;&lt;b&gt;Drawing Stories...With Words&lt;/b&gt;&lt;/a&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think you have to consider a LARGE audience each time you post, but share material that is (or seems to be) on the one-to-one (personal) level. If you post in a personal manner that seems to speak to each individual reader&#8230;then you are both, touching the individual aspect, but for a larger, broad audience. I think even when you post to a group of 1000+ readers&#8230;you can maintain the personal (one-to-one) feel by commenting back to each reader who responds and addressing them each&#8230;. You will NEVER be able to attend to each reader when you begin to gain a greater reader base&#8230;.but you can at least give the impression that you are willing to communicate with each reader as it applies&#8230; and that I believe is honest enough to keep readers coming back&#8230;</p>
<p>It&#8217;s a hard thing to do. I know&#8230;this year I went from 20 readers per week to 50+ readers per day&#8230;not LARGE scale compared to sites like yours but a definite change in communication and approach from a personal blogging perspective.</p>
<p>~Bobby Ozuna<br />
<a href="http://inotauthor.blogspot.com" rel="nofollow"><b>Drawing Stories&#8230;With Words</b></a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Lionel Menchaca</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisbrogan.com/the-matter-of-scale/comment-page-1/#comment-141993</link>
		<dc:creator>Lionel Menchaca</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 22 Oct 2008 05:46:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisbrogan.com/?p=2873#comment-141993</guid>
		<description>How could I leave this part out? Building a team also means building a community of customers on our Dell properties. Dell fans who are not Dell employees are the most effective kind of advocate we could ask for. 

We have to give customers a reason to be Dell advocates. Getting that point across to colleagues in the business is not always an easy task.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>How could I leave this part out? Building a team also means building a community of customers on our Dell properties. Dell fans who are not Dell employees are the most effective kind of advocate we could ask for. </p>
<p>We have to give customers a reason to be Dell advocates. Getting that point across to colleagues in the business is not always an easy task.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Lionel Menchaca</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisbrogan.com/the-matter-of-scale/comment-page-1/#comment-141992</link>
		<dc:creator>Lionel Menchaca</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 22 Oct 2008 05:29:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisbrogan.com/?p=2873#comment-141992</guid>
		<description>Good stuff Chris… as usual.  Your readers make some interesting points. I tend to agree with a lot of what Andrew Feinberg says in this thread. Having lived corporate social media for Dell for well over 2 years, I can definitely confirm that being “out there” in as many social sites/ commenting on blog posts/ message boards, etc. is the way to build your own personal credibility as well as your company’s.

That said, any single person can only scale so much. 

So, back to the question at hand… yes, I believe social media does scale, but it’s not easy. Building a team is the only way to do it. We’re still trying to build processes and tools to support our customers within our own sites and outside of them. That means we need teams of people in place all working toward a common goal. In my experience, customers don’t really care if they hear from me directly or someone else from our team—all they care about is connecting with someone at Dell who can answer their questions/ solve their issue.

In my experience, being a corporate blogger means being a customer advocate, a writer/ editor and a social media evangelist who is both internally and externally focused. Not easy, but it sure is fun.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Good stuff Chris… as usual.  Your readers make some interesting points. I tend to agree with a lot of what Andrew Feinberg says in this thread. Having lived corporate social media for Dell for well over 2 years, I can definitely confirm that being “out there” in as many social sites/ commenting on blog posts/ message boards, etc. is the way to build your own personal credibility as well as your company’s.</p>
<p>That said, any single person can only scale so much. </p>
<p>So, back to the question at hand… yes, I believe social media does scale, but it’s not easy. Building a team is the only way to do it. We’re still trying to build processes and tools to support our customers within our own sites and outside of them. That means we need teams of people in place all working toward a common goal. In my experience, customers don’t really care if they hear from me directly or someone else from our team—all they care about is connecting with someone at Dell who can answer their questions/ solve their issue.</p>
<p>In my experience, being a corporate blogger means being a customer advocate, a writer/ editor and a social media evangelist who is both internally and externally focused. Not easy, but it sure is fun.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Justin Levy</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisbrogan.com/the-matter-of-scale/comment-page-1/#comment-141985</link>
		<dc:creator>Justin Levy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 22 Oct 2008 04:24:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisbrogan.com/?p=2873#comment-141985</guid>
		<description>Chris,

I think you pose some really interesting questions and ones that I&#039;m sure you and other A-list bloggers face often.  However, the one thing that I love about this space is that many of the top bloggers, you include, take the time out to develop friendships with as many people as possible and you&#039;re truly genuine about it.

Does that mean that it scales? I think it scales but is harder and harder to maintain at that level.  It makes it hard to respond to every single question, email, request, etc that you might receive.  It involves having to start saying &quot;no&quot; when you were always used to saying &quot;yes&quot;.  It also means having to start looking at forming a team to help you manage your other responsibilities.  I think the thing that you have to always be careful of though is not to let go of the very things that got you to the level you&#039;re at.  For instance, Gary Vaynerchuk has a whole team that now helps him manage his skyrocketing career, however he still stays involved with his community on a daily basis.

I think you are doing an excellent job Chris though I&#039;m sure it&#039;s difficult to manage with the number of contacts and opportunities you receive daily.  Keep up the great work!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Chris,</p>
<p>I think you pose some really interesting questions and ones that I&#8217;m sure you and other A-list bloggers face often.  However, the one thing that I love about this space is that many of the top bloggers, you include, take the time out to develop friendships with as many people as possible and you&#8217;re truly genuine about it.</p>
<p>Does that mean that it scales? I think it scales but is harder and harder to maintain at that level.  It makes it hard to respond to every single question, email, request, etc that you might receive.  It involves having to start saying &#8220;no&#8221; when you were always used to saying &#8220;yes&#8221;.  It also means having to start looking at forming a team to help you manage your other responsibilities.  I think the thing that you have to always be careful of though is not to let go of the very things that got you to the level you&#8217;re at.  For instance, Gary Vaynerchuk has a whole team that now helps him manage his skyrocketing career, however he still stays involved with his community on a daily basis.</p>
<p>I think you are doing an excellent job Chris though I&#8217;m sure it&#8217;s difficult to manage with the number of contacts and opportunities you receive daily.  Keep up the great work!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Shannon Ehlers</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisbrogan.com/the-matter-of-scale/comment-page-1/#comment-141946</link>
		<dc:creator>Shannon Ehlers</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 21 Oct 2008 23:01:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisbrogan.com/?p=2873#comment-141946</guid>
		<description>Social media scales well for you (Chris Brogan) because you have mastered the art of making the consumer feel like the specific recipient. 

The trick, I guess, is to make sure each person who is reading/listening/following feels like the &quot;one&quot;.  You do it marvelously.  

Furthermore, there is a certain continuity in your different pieces, something deeper than the words that ties them together.  Those folks who say it won&#039;t scale haven&#039;t figured this part out yet. 

Using these tools for the &quot;enterprise&quot; (that word always transports me to the bridge in front of Cpt. Kirk) raises a whole different set of issues.  First let me say that for me, the social media tools are kind of a &quot;so what?&quot;  Don&#039;t get me wrong, I love that I can publish wide varieties of content at will, but really, they&#039;re just communication tools.  They will change things for the enterprise slowly, the same way the telephone changed things. The phone was unique when it came out because it connected people by voice who were miles apart geographically.  Eventually, though, a telephone just became one more reality of modern life, for better or worse.  I assume (and hope) that in your role as a true thought leader, that you would use SM the way a field general uses his communication technologies - to assemble your troops and lead them to the battle front.  And not the way a telemarketer uses the phone, that&#039;s just a silly waste of time.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Social media scales well for you (Chris Brogan) because you have mastered the art of making the consumer feel like the specific recipient. </p>
<p>The trick, I guess, is to make sure each person who is reading/listening/following feels like the &#8220;one&#8221;.  You do it marvelously.  </p>
<p>Furthermore, there is a certain continuity in your different pieces, something deeper than the words that ties them together.  Those folks who say it won&#8217;t scale haven&#8217;t figured this part out yet. </p>
<p>Using these tools for the &#8220;enterprise&#8221; (that word always transports me to the bridge in front of Cpt. Kirk) raises a whole different set of issues.  First let me say that for me, the social media tools are kind of a &#8220;so what?&#8221;  Don&#8217;t get me wrong, I love that I can publish wide varieties of content at will, but really, they&#8217;re just communication tools.  They will change things for the enterprise slowly, the same way the telephone changed things. The phone was unique when it came out because it connected people by voice who were miles apart geographically.  Eventually, though, a telephone just became one more reality of modern life, for better or worse.  I assume (and hope) that in your role as a true thought leader, that you would use SM the way a field general uses his communication technologies &#8211; to assemble your troops and lead them to the battle front.  And not the way a telemarketer uses the phone, that&#8217;s just a silly waste of time.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Connie Bensen</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisbrogan.com/the-matter-of-scale/comment-page-1/#comment-141940</link>
		<dc:creator>Connie Bensen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 21 Oct 2008 21:56:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisbrogan.com/?p=2873#comment-141940</guid>
		<description>You asked: &quot;Is it less “genuine” to have a team behind your brand? I don’t think so, but am curious to know what you think. Do you divulge it, or do you keep it quiet?&quot;

It isn&#039;t less genuine at all - they are called evangelists, advocates, etc. You have us - your readership is your team. And if they&#039;re paid like your intern, then staff. If your intern is promoting the &#039;Chris Brogan&#039; brand then why not make it public? You are a company of one that is growing :) (otherwise your intern will confuse people if it&#039;s a secret). And if the intern is for Crosstech = then that&#039;s easier.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You asked: &#8220;Is it less “genuine” to have a team behind your brand? I don’t think so, but am curious to know what you think. Do you divulge it, or do you keep it quiet?&#8221;</p>
<p>It isn&#8217;t less genuine at all &#8211; they are called evangelists, advocates, etc. You have us &#8211; your readership is your team. And if they&#8217;re paid like your intern, then staff. If your intern is promoting the &#8216;Chris Brogan&#8217; brand then why not make it public? You are a company of one that is growing :) (otherwise your intern will confuse people if it&#8217;s a secret). And if the intern is for Crosstech = then that&#8217;s easier.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
