<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The Myth of Brand Loyalty</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.chrisbrogan.com/the-myth-of-brand-loyalty/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.chrisbrogan.com/the-myth-of-brand-loyalty/</link>
	<description>Learn How Human Business Works - Beyond Social Media</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 21 Mar 2010 07:17:14 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Ray Martin</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisbrogan.com/the-myth-of-brand-loyalty/comment-page-2/#comment-188980</link>
		<dc:creator>Ray Martin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 02 Sep 2009 09:00:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisbrogan.com/?p=4225#comment-188980</guid>
		<description>This reminded me of something that T-Mobile used to do when I would call customer service, they&#039;d thank me for being a loyal customer for x number of years.  I had started my first cell plan with them when they were VoiceStream.  It was sort of canned or scripted, but I liked the acknowledgement that I had stuck with them.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I also REALLY like the fact that your e-mail newsletters address me personally.  I know that&#039;s part of the program you use, but it was something I noticed right away from the first one I read.  It was like you were talking to me.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This reminded me of something that T-Mobile used to do when I would call customer service, they&#39;d thank me for being a loyal customer for x number of years.  I had started my first cell plan with them when they were VoiceStream.  It was sort of canned or scripted, but I liked the acknowledgement that I had stuck with them.</p>
<p>I also REALLY like the fact that your e-mail newsletters address me personally.  I know that&#39;s part of the program you use, but it was something I noticed right away from the first one I read.  It was like you were talking to me.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ray Martin</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisbrogan.com/the-myth-of-brand-loyalty/comment-page-2/#comment-177388</link>
		<dc:creator>Ray Martin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 02 Sep 2009 04:00:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisbrogan.com/?p=4225#comment-177388</guid>
		<description>This reminded me of something that T-Mobile used to do when I would call customer service, they&#039;d thank me for being a loyal customer for x number of years.  I had started my first cell plan with them when they were VoiceStream.  It was sort of canned or scripted, but I liked the acknowledgement that I had stuck with them.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I also REALLY like the fact that your e-mail newsletters address me personally.  I know that&#039;s part of the program you use, but it was something I noticed right away from the first one I read.  It was like you were talking to me.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This reminded me of something that T-Mobile used to do when I would call customer service, they&#39;d thank me for being a loyal customer for x number of years.  I had started my first cell plan with them when they were VoiceStream.  It was sort of canned or scripted, but I liked the acknowledgement that I had stuck with them.</p>
<p>I also REALLY like the fact that your e-mail newsletters address me personally.  I know that&#39;s part of the program you use, but it was something I noticed right away from the first one I read.  It was like you were talking to me.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: deboarhberry</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisbrogan.com/the-myth-of-brand-loyalty/comment-page-2/#comment-176223</link>
		<dc:creator>deboarhberry</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 19 Aug 2009 19:08:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisbrogan.com/?p=4225#comment-176223</guid>
		<description>RIGHT ON, BROTHER!!!!!!!!!!!!  Do you think they&#039;re paying attention?  By &quot;they&#039;re&quot; I mean all businesses who solicit existing customers, don&#039;t offer incentives to stay with that business and take you for granted because you are and have been a loyal customer.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>RIGHT ON, BROTHER!!!!!!!!!!!!  Do you think they&#39;re paying attention?  By &#8220;they&#39;re&#8221; I mean all businesses who solicit existing customers, don&#39;t offer incentives to stay with that business and take you for granted because you are and have been a loyal customer.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: dsearls</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisbrogan.com/the-myth-of-brand-loyalty/comment-page-2/#comment-175770</link>
		<dc:creator>dsearls</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 15 Aug 2009 18:18:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisbrogan.com/?p=4225#comment-175770</guid>
		<description>Great points, Chris.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;And yes, VRM is the way. (And there will be many VRM ways.)&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Meanwhile, no CRM system will cut it. It&#039;s not just that they&#039;re dumb, or operate at companies that don&#039;t care. It&#039;s that they bear the entire burden of a &quot;relationship&quot; that isn&#039;t. &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;We need native relationship-burden-bearing tools on the customer&#039;s side. That&#039;s what we&#039;re working on at ProjectVRM. (Which is actually a collection of efforts, scattered mostly between the U.S. and the U.K.)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Great points, Chris.</p>
<p>And yes, VRM is the way. (And there will be many VRM ways.)</p>
<p>Meanwhile, no CRM system will cut it. It&#39;s not just that they&#39;re dumb, or operate at companies that don&#39;t care. It&#39;s that they bear the entire burden of a &#8220;relationship&#8221; that isn&#39;t. </p>
<p>We need native relationship-burden-bearing tools on the customer&#39;s side. That&#39;s what we&#39;re working on at ProjectVRM. (Which is actually a collection of efforts, scattered mostly between the U.S. and the U.K.)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: nigelcaine</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisbrogan.com/the-myth-of-brand-loyalty/comment-page-2/#comment-175658</link>
		<dc:creator>nigelcaine</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 13 Aug 2009 17:00:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisbrogan.com/?p=4225#comment-175658</guid>
		<description>Hi Chris,&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I read about something similar in a class a long time ago. It&#039;s possible they are trying to reinforce the reasons why you bought the Mac to address any buyers remorse. &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;In my class the example was how auto companies were addressing buyers remorse in their tv commercials which serve two purposes, the first being to attract new customers, the second to offset buyers remorse, and this was done by going through the attractive features&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Nigel</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Chris,</p>
<p>I read about something similar in a class a long time ago. It&#39;s possible they are trying to reinforce the reasons why you bought the Mac to address any buyers remorse. </p>
<p>In my class the example was how auto companies were addressing buyers remorse in their tv commercials which serve two purposes, the first being to attract new customers, the second to offset buyers remorse, and this was done by going through the attractive features</p>
<p>Nigel</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Cindy West &#8211; Does technology take the common sense out of brand marketing? &#171; Stalwart Communications Blog</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisbrogan.com/the-myth-of-brand-loyalty/comment-page-2/#comment-175511</link>
		<dc:creator>Cindy West &#8211; Does technology take the common sense out of brand marketing? &#171; Stalwart Communications Blog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 12 Aug 2009 05:05:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisbrogan.com/?p=4225#comment-175511</guid>
		<description>[...] was reading a blog post over the weekend on Chris Brogan.com titled &#8220;The Myth of Brand Loyalty&#8221; and his post struck a nerve. Chris talks about his long relationship with Apple as a satisfied [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] was reading a blog post over the weekend on Chris Brogan.com titled &#8220;The Myth of Brand Loyalty&#8221; and his post struck a nerve. Chris talks about his long relationship with Apple as a satisfied [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: crmtutor</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisbrogan.com/the-myth-of-brand-loyalty/comment-page-2/#comment-175497</link>
		<dc:creator>crmtutor</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 11 Aug 2009 19:04:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisbrogan.com/?p=4225#comment-175497</guid>
		<description>Chris, I agree 100% We should demand that these brands (as you correctly boxed - where we spend thousands) get the necessary systems in place. Use (some of) the profit they make from us, their consumers, and improve our experience in dealing with them. Main profile details and interaction (incidents, purchases, warrantees, etc). It&#039;s not that difficult, I know. And the fact is, most companies/brands that invest in their own CRM (Customer Relationship Management) strategy, are rewarded with &quot;as loyal as can be&quot; customers that return for business.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Chris, I agree 100% We should demand that these brands (as you correctly boxed &#8211; where we spend thousands) get the necessary systems in place. Use (some of) the profit they make from us, their consumers, and improve our experience in dealing with them. Main profile details and interaction (incidents, purchases, warrantees, etc). It&#39;s not that difficult, I know. And the fact is, most companies/brands that invest in their own CRM (Customer Relationship Management) strategy, are rewarded with &#8220;as loyal as can be&#8221; customers that return for business.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: cindabaxter</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisbrogan.com/the-myth-of-brand-loyalty/comment-page-2/#comment-175490</link>
		<dc:creator>cindabaxter</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 11 Aug 2009 16:41:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisbrogan.com/?p=4225#comment-175490</guid>
		<description>We’re of like minds; just got the same email this weekend, about 24 hours after registering my new MBP. Cracked me up since I’ve been an Apple devotee since 1985 (which adds up to at least a dozen Macs alone). &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Silly, silly, silly, Uncle Steve....c’mon...it’s not like I’m asking for a birthday gift or anything....</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>We’re of like minds; just got the same email this weekend, about 24 hours after registering my new MBP. Cracked me up since I’ve been an Apple devotee since 1985 (which adds up to at least a dozen Macs alone). </p>
<p>Silly, silly, silly, Uncle Steve&#8230;.c’mon&#8230;it’s not like I’m asking for a birthday gift or anything&#8230;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: JonAndersonFan1025</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisbrogan.com/the-myth-of-brand-loyalty/comment-page-2/#comment-175471</link>
		<dc:creator>JonAndersonFan1025</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 11 Aug 2009 08:50:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisbrogan.com/?p=4225#comment-175471</guid>
		<description>Hmmm...interesting point you make, Chris! I&#039;m new to your blog, but I definitely like your style. Your blog is SO going in my faves! &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;You would think Apple would polish their PR tactics a bit and say to their trusty, loyal clientele, &quot;since you&#039;re our loyal customers, here is a sweet deal for your next computer/hardware purchase.&quot; &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;After all, if they REALLY want to make Microsoft look &#039;bad,&#039; in the PR department, let alone computer OS department (as indicated by the last few months&#039; spate of &#039;hip-looking youngster&#039;-vs-stuffy-beige-40-something&#039; commercials), they need to hunker down next to their customers and lure a few more people into the ultra-hip Garden of Eden that is Apple, Inc., by doing the following:&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;1) Being very obvious about donating more than a few computers to underfunded schools. Not only would that incur instant good karma on their part towards the disadvantaged school districts who are floundering in this crappy economy, but it would further encourage the brand competitiveness that spurs on the brand loyalty they, as a company, would naturally desire. Win-win! ;-)&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;2) Include open-source software (read: Linux-compatible stuff) on their computers that encourages people (especially those in the 18-30 age group) to get their developer-geek on..something that Microsoft doesn&#039;t allow people to do within the OS they offer. (Mind you, I&#039;m a Linux freak who is seriously considering a Mac solely for the &#039;Garage Band&#039; music composition app. Linux is great, but they still don&#039;t really have much in the way for music comp apps that rock out, and I&#039;m a LONG way from developing my own. But I thoroughly dislike Microsoft purely for their money-hogging anti-open-source business-ethics-principle. So Mac is my next viable option.)&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Anyhow, those are my thoughts.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Peace and Crunchy Geekiness,&lt;br&gt;Kat ^.^</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hmmm&#8230;interesting point you make, Chris! I&#39;m new to your blog, but I definitely like your style. Your blog is SO going in my faves! </p>
<p>You would think Apple would polish their PR tactics a bit and say to their trusty, loyal clientele, &#8220;since you&#39;re our loyal customers, here is a sweet deal for your next computer/hardware purchase.&#8221; </p>
<p>After all, if they REALLY want to make Microsoft look &#39;bad,&#39; in the PR department, let alone computer OS department (as indicated by the last few months&#39; spate of &#39;hip-looking youngster&#39;-vs-stuffy-beige-40-something&#39; commercials), they need to hunker down next to their customers and lure a few more people into the ultra-hip Garden of Eden that is Apple, Inc., by doing the following:</p>
<p>1) Being very obvious about donating more than a few computers to underfunded schools. Not only would that incur instant good karma on their part towards the disadvantaged school districts who are floundering in this crappy economy, but it would further encourage the brand competitiveness that spurs on the brand loyalty they, as a company, would naturally desire. Win-win! ;-)</p>
<p>2) Include open-source software (read: Linux-compatible stuff) on their computers that encourages people (especially those in the 18-30 age group) to get their developer-geek on..something that Microsoft doesn&#39;t allow people to do within the OS they offer. (Mind you, I&#39;m a Linux freak who is seriously considering a Mac solely for the &#39;Garage Band&#39; music composition app. Linux is great, but they still don&#39;t really have much in the way for music comp apps that rock out, and I&#39;m a LONG way from developing my own. But I thoroughly dislike Microsoft purely for their money-hogging anti-open-source business-ethics-principle. So Mac is my next viable option.)</p>
<p>Anyhow, those are my thoughts.</p>
<p>Peace and Crunchy Geekiness,<br />Kat ^.^</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: michellegreer</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisbrogan.com/the-myth-of-brand-loyalty/comment-page-2/#comment-175464</link>
		<dc:creator>michellegreer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 11 Aug 2009 05:13:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisbrogan.com/?p=4225#comment-175464</guid>
		<description>Actually, hold up.  These would both be sequel queries.  Very easy to pull.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Actually, hold up.  These would both be sequel queries.  Very easy to pull.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
