<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Thinking About Magazines</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.chrisbrogan.com/thinking-about-magazines/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.chrisbrogan.com/thinking-about-magazines/</link>
	<description>Learn How Human Business Works - Beyond Social Media</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 12:25:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: youtube downloader</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisbrogan.com/thinking-about-magazines/comment-page-2/#comment-288377</link>
		<dc:creator>youtube downloader</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 07 Dec 2010 11:23:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisbrogan.com/?p=2484#comment-288377</guid>
		<description>While we’re talking about how cool FriendFeed is, and how much we want big businesses to join the conversation, I want us (and by “us,” I mean anyone contemplating their social media expertise) to think about the Top 10 magazines and what we might do with these people to help them engage.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>While we’re talking about how cool FriendFeed is, and how much we want big businesses to join the conversation, I want us (and by “us,” I mean anyone contemplating their social media expertise) to think about the Top 10 magazines and what we might do with these people to help them engage.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: youtube downloader</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisbrogan.com/thinking-about-magazines/comment-page-2/#comment-288378</link>
		<dc:creator>youtube downloader</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 07 Dec 2010 11:23:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisbrogan.com/?p=2484#comment-288378</guid>
		<description>While we’re talking about how cool FriendFeed is, and how much we want big businesses to join the conversation, I want us (and by “us,” I mean anyone contemplating their social media expertise) to think about the Top 10 magazines and what we might do with these people to help them engage.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>While we’re talking about how cool FriendFeed is, and how much we want big businesses to join the conversation, I want us (and by “us,” I mean anyone contemplating their social media expertise) to think about the Top 10 magazines and what we might do with these people to help them engage.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: youtube downloader</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisbrogan.com/thinking-about-magazines/comment-page-2/#comment-288379</link>
		<dc:creator>youtube downloader</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 07 Dec 2010 11:23:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisbrogan.com/?p=2484#comment-288379</guid>
		<description>While we’re talking about how cool FriendFeed is, and how much we want big businesses to join the conversation, I want us (and by “us,” I mean anyone contemplating their social media expertise) to think about the Top 10 magazines and what we might do with these people to help them engage.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>While we’re talking about how cool FriendFeed is, and how much we want big businesses to join the conversation, I want us (and by “us,” I mean anyone contemplating their social media expertise) to think about the Top 10 magazines and what we might do with these people to help them engage.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Stephen Dill</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisbrogan.com/thinking-about-magazines/comment-page-2/#comment-123487</link>
		<dc:creator>Stephen Dill</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 03 May 2008 18:56:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisbrogan.com/?p=2484#comment-123487</guid>
		<description>To the question, what is the economic motivation? Traffic. If I post a video of mine to National Geographic&#039;s website, you can bet money I am going to promote the heck out of that within my community for the association and glamor of my content being there among those professionals. And who would not want traffic. 

Then there is the G2 value - market intelligence. Why rely on one editor to determine the next hot column or article? Why not tap into 16 million readers and amateur naturalists? 

I suspect this is just a matter of time. The print will always have a place in the definition of a timeless brand. With the growth of online magazines and newspapers are discovering they can publish so much more than &quot;what fits&quot; in the constrained print environment. Now, with the rise in social media, they will catch on to the &quot;We Are Smarter Than Me&quot; potential and add a whole new dimension to their brand - and history. 

Good question Chris - thanks for the effort!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>To the question, what is the economic motivation? Traffic. If I post a video of mine to National Geographic&#8217;s website, you can bet money I am going to promote the heck out of that within my community for the association and glamor of my content being there among those professionals. And who would not want traffic. </p>
<p>Then there is the G2 value &#8211; market intelligence. Why rely on one editor to determine the next hot column or article? Why not tap into 16 million readers and amateur naturalists? </p>
<p>I suspect this is just a matter of time. The print will always have a place in the definition of a timeless brand. With the growth of online magazines and newspapers are discovering they can publish so much more than &#8220;what fits&#8221; in the constrained print environment. Now, with the rise in social media, they will catch on to the &#8220;We Are Smarter Than Me&#8221; potential and add a whole new dimension to their brand &#8211; and history. </p>
<p>Good question Chris &#8211; thanks for the effort!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Stephen Dill</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisbrogan.com/thinking-about-magazines/comment-page-2/#comment-244692</link>
		<dc:creator>Stephen Dill</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 03 May 2008 18:56:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisbrogan.com/?p=2484#comment-244692</guid>
		<description>To the question, what is the economic motivation? Traffic. If I post a video of mine to National Geographic&#039;s website, you can bet money I am going to promote the heck out of that within my community for the association and glamor of my content being there among those professionals. And who would not want traffic. 

Then there is the G2 value - market intelligence. Why rely on one editor to determine the next hot column or article? Why not tap into 16 million readers and amateur naturalists? 

I suspect this is just a matter of time. The print will always have a place in the definition of a timeless brand. With the growth of online magazines and newspapers are discovering they can publish so much more than &quot;what fits&quot; in the constrained print environment. Now, with the rise in social media, they will catch on to the &quot;We Are Smarter Than Me&quot; potential and add a whole new dimension to their brand - and history. 

Good question Chris - thanks for the effort!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>To the question, what is the economic motivation? Traffic. If I post a video of mine to National Geographic&#8217;s website, you can bet money I am going to promote the heck out of that within my community for the association and glamor of my content being there among those professionals. And who would not want traffic. </p>
<p>Then there is the G2 value &#8211; market intelligence. Why rely on one editor to determine the next hot column or article? Why not tap into 16 million readers and amateur naturalists? </p>
<p>I suspect this is just a matter of time. The print will always have a place in the definition of a timeless brand. With the growth of online magazines and newspapers are discovering they can publish so much more than &#8220;what fits&#8221; in the constrained print environment. Now, with the rise in social media, they will catch on to the &#8220;We Are Smarter Than Me&#8221; potential and add a whole new dimension to their brand &#8211; and history. </p>
<p>Good question Chris &#8211; thanks for the effort!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Penny Haynes</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisbrogan.com/thinking-about-magazines/comment-page-2/#comment-122926</link>
		<dc:creator>Penny Haynes</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 24 Apr 2008 22:27:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisbrogan.com/?p=2484#comment-122926</guid>
		<description>This question is right up my alley.  I have really considered whether or not to approach magazines like this with my software, which does what you say - it lets the community not only upload audio and video and post text, it actually helps them easily create multimedia so they have something to upload.  

The real trick, as others have said, is that the audience who is still receiving these magazines aren&#039;t that multimedia or social media savvy.  Most probably don&#039;t go to their magazine&#039;s site. Even if they allowed User Generated Content, most users wouldn&#039;t know how to create it in order to participate.  

Since the behemoths of the print world are slow to join the social media world, first THEY would need to be taught what it is before they could offer it attractively enough to entice their readers to participate.  I think the real key to getting social media and internet novices into the online world is by planting someone within their existing community to take them by the hand and show them what to do and explain why they should bother doing it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This question is right up my alley.  I have really considered whether or not to approach magazines like this with my software, which does what you say &#8211; it lets the community not only upload audio and video and post text, it actually helps them easily create multimedia so they have something to upload.  </p>
<p>The real trick, as others have said, is that the audience who is still receiving these magazines aren&#8217;t that multimedia or social media savvy.  Most probably don&#8217;t go to their magazine&#8217;s site. Even if they allowed User Generated Content, most users wouldn&#8217;t know how to create it in order to participate.  </p>
<p>Since the behemoths of the print world are slow to join the social media world, first THEY would need to be taught what it is before they could offer it attractively enough to entice their readers to participate.  I think the real key to getting social media and internet novices into the online world is by planting someone within their existing community to take them by the hand and show them what to do and explain why they should bother doing it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Penny Haynes</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisbrogan.com/thinking-about-magazines/comment-page-2/#comment-244690</link>
		<dc:creator>Penny Haynes</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 24 Apr 2008 22:27:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisbrogan.com/?p=2484#comment-244690</guid>
		<description>This question is right up my alley.  I have really considered whether or not to approach magazines like this with my software, which does what you say - it lets the community not only upload audio and video and post text, it actually helps them easily create multimedia so they have something to upload.  

The real trick, as others have said, is that the audience who is still receiving these magazines aren&#039;t that multimedia or social media savvy.  Most probably don&#039;t go to their magazine&#039;s site. Even if they allowed User Generated Content, most users wouldn&#039;t know how to create it in order to participate.  

Since the behemoths of the print world are slow to join the social media world, first THEY would need to be taught what it is before they could offer it attractively enough to entice their readers to participate.  I think the real key to getting social media and internet novices into the online world is by planting someone within their existing community to take them by the hand and show them what to do and explain why they should bother doing it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This question is right up my alley.  I have really considered whether or not to approach magazines like this with my software, which does what you say &#8211; it lets the community not only upload audio and video and post text, it actually helps them easily create multimedia so they have something to upload.  </p>
<p>The real trick, as others have said, is that the audience who is still receiving these magazines aren&#8217;t that multimedia or social media savvy.  Most probably don&#8217;t go to their magazine&#8217;s site. Even if they allowed User Generated Content, most users wouldn&#8217;t know how to create it in order to participate.  </p>
<p>Since the behemoths of the print world are slow to join the social media world, first THEY would need to be taught what it is before they could offer it attractively enough to entice their readers to participate.  I think the real key to getting social media and internet novices into the online world is by planting someone within their existing community to take them by the hand and show them what to do and explain why they should bother doing it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Penny Haynes</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisbrogan.com/thinking-about-magazines/comment-page-2/#comment-244691</link>
		<dc:creator>Penny Haynes</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 24 Apr 2008 22:27:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisbrogan.com/?p=2484#comment-244691</guid>
		<description>This question is right up my alley.  I have really considered whether or not to approach magazines like this with my software, which does what you say - it lets the community not only upload audio and video and post text, it actually helps them easily create multimedia so they have something to upload.  

The real trick, as others have said, is that the audience who is still receiving these magazines aren&#039;t that multimedia or social media savvy.  Most probably don&#039;t go to their magazine&#039;s site. Even if they allowed User Generated Content, most users wouldn&#039;t know how to create it in order to participate.  

Since the behemoths of the print world are slow to join the social media world, first THEY would need to be taught what it is before they could offer it attractively enough to entice their readers to participate.  I think the real key to getting social media and internet novices into the online world is by planting someone within their existing community to take them by the hand and show them what to do and explain why they should bother doing it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This question is right up my alley.  I have really considered whether or not to approach magazines like this with my software, which does what you say &#8211; it lets the community not only upload audio and video and post text, it actually helps them easily create multimedia so they have something to upload.  </p>
<p>The real trick, as others have said, is that the audience who is still receiving these magazines aren&#8217;t that multimedia or social media savvy.  Most probably don&#8217;t go to their magazine&#8217;s site. Even if they allowed User Generated Content, most users wouldn&#8217;t know how to create it in order to participate.  </p>
<p>Since the behemoths of the print world are slow to join the social media world, first THEY would need to be taught what it is before they could offer it attractively enough to entice their readers to participate.  I think the real key to getting social media and internet novices into the online world is by planting someone within their existing community to take them by the hand and show them what to do and explain why they should bother doing it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Noah David Simon</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisbrogan.com/thinking-about-magazines/comment-page-2/#comment-122859</link>
		<dc:creator>Noah David Simon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 23 Apr 2008 07:28:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisbrogan.com/?p=2484#comment-122859</guid>
		<description>as someone who has worked in publishing on the marketing end of things I would say that publishing is hurting and it isn&#039;t go to be fixed.  The big fish will sell advertising on networks and the content will not be rewarded.  The identities of these magazine&#039;s are going to become an archive that will become a museum.  Bigger named identities will survive and will be bought as charity projects for web portals, and will only find a commercial audience with regular video broadcasts and other hot content.  It is silly to talk about turning Woman’s Day or RedBook into a popular blog when we have web identities that are very marketable like Susan Reynolds.  As for AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAARP it will survive because it is an organization that represents an age group that decides elections.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>as someone who has worked in publishing on the marketing end of things I would say that publishing is hurting and it isn&#8217;t go to be fixed.  The big fish will sell advertising on networks and the content will not be rewarded.  The identities of these magazine&#8217;s are going to become an archive that will become a museum.  Bigger named identities will survive and will be bought as charity projects for web portals, and will only find a commercial audience with regular video broadcasts and other hot content.  It is silly to talk about turning Woman’s Day or RedBook into a popular blog when we have web identities that are very marketable like Susan Reynolds.  As for AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAARP it will survive because it is an organization that represents an age group that decides elections.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Noah David Simon</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisbrogan.com/thinking-about-magazines/comment-page-2/#comment-244688</link>
		<dc:creator>Noah David Simon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 23 Apr 2008 07:28:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisbrogan.com/?p=2484#comment-244688</guid>
		<description>as someone who has worked in publishing on the marketing end of things I would say that publishing is hurting and it isn&#039;t go to be fixed.  The big fish will sell advertising on networks and the content will not be rewarded.  The identities of these magazine&#039;s are going to become an archive that will become a museum.  Bigger named identities will survive and will be bought as charity projects for web portals, and will only find a commercial audience with regular video broadcasts and other hot content.  It is silly to talk about turning Woman’s Day or RedBook into a popular blog when we have web identities that are very marketable like Susan Reynolds.  As for AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAARP it will survive because it is an organization that represents an age group that decides elections.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>as someone who has worked in publishing on the marketing end of things I would say that publishing is hurting and it isn&#8217;t go to be fixed.  The big fish will sell advertising on networks and the content will not be rewarded.  The identities of these magazine&#8217;s are going to become an archive that will become a museum.  Bigger named identities will survive and will be bought as charity projects for web portals, and will only find a commercial audience with regular video broadcasts and other hot content.  It is silly to talk about turning Woman’s Day or RedBook into a popular blog when we have web identities that are very marketable like Susan Reynolds.  As for AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAARP it will survive because it is an organization that represents an age group that decides elections.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

