<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Twitter as a Community Tool</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.chrisbrogan.com/twitter-as-a-community-tool/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.chrisbrogan.com/twitter-as-a-community-tool/</link>
	<description>Learn How Human Business Works - Beyond Social Media</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 12:25:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Guy P</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisbrogan.com/twitter-as-a-community-tool/comment-page-1/#comment-13954</link>
		<dc:creator>Guy P</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 15 Mar 2007 12:26:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://grasshopperfactory.com/cbc/twitter-as-a-community-tool/#comment-13954</guid>
		<description>One of the problems with groups is that Twitter usage varies so widely by topic... you wouldn&#039;t want to receive all the messages from everybody on the MIT campus, for example. It would be cool if a &quot;group&quot; was like a special kind of user, so when you directly messaged them &quot;d MITwitter worst spaghetti ever in cafe&quot; it was automatically spat out of their Twitter feed.

If Twitter could keep it trivial to start a group like &quot;the five of us who are going for dinner tonight&quot; then I would be all over that like *whoa.*</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>One of the problems with groups is that Twitter usage varies so widely by topic&#8230; you wouldn&#8217;t want to receive all the messages from everybody on the MIT campus, for example. It would be cool if a &#8220;group&#8221; was like a special kind of user, so when you directly messaged them &#8220;d MITwitter worst spaghetti ever in cafe&#8221; it was automatically spat out of their Twitter feed.</p>
<p>If Twitter could keep it trivial to start a group like &#8220;the five of us who are going for dinner tonight&#8221; then I would be all over that like *whoa.*</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Guy P</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisbrogan.com/twitter-as-a-community-tool/comment-page-1/#comment-233902</link>
		<dc:creator>Guy P</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 15 Mar 2007 12:26:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://grasshopperfactory.com/cbc/twitter-as-a-community-tool/#comment-233902</guid>
		<description>One of the problems with groups is that Twitter usage varies so widely by topic... you wouldn&#039;t want to receive all the messages from everybody on the MIT campus, for example. It would be cool if a &quot;group&quot; was like a special kind of user, so when you directly messaged them &quot;d MITwitter worst spaghetti ever in cafe&quot; it was automatically spat out of their Twitter feed.

If Twitter could keep it trivial to start a group like &quot;the five of us who are going for dinner tonight&quot; then I would be all over that like *whoa.*</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>One of the problems with groups is that Twitter usage varies so widely by topic&#8230; you wouldn&#8217;t want to receive all the messages from everybody on the MIT campus, for example. It would be cool if a &#8220;group&#8221; was like a special kind of user, so when you directly messaged them &#8220;d MITwitter worst spaghetti ever in cafe&#8221; it was automatically spat out of their Twitter feed.</p>
<p>If Twitter could keep it trivial to start a group like &#8220;the five of us who are going for dinner tonight&#8221; then I would be all over that like *whoa.*</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Justin Kownacki</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisbrogan.com/twitter-as-a-community-tool/comment-page-1/#comment-13455</link>
		<dc:creator>Justin Kownacki</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 11 Mar 2007 22:46:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://grasshopperfactory.com/cbc/twitter-as-a-community-tool/#comment-13455</guid>
		<description>It&#039;s possible that groups are SO obviously a good idea, they simply held them back from the initial release, so they could drop them in &quot;by popular demand&quot; down the line...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#8217;s possible that groups are SO obviously a good idea, they simply held them back from the initial release, so they could drop them in &#8220;by popular demand&#8221; down the line&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Justin Kownacki</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisbrogan.com/twitter-as-a-community-tool/comment-page-1/#comment-233901</link>
		<dc:creator>Justin Kownacki</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 11 Mar 2007 22:46:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://grasshopperfactory.com/cbc/twitter-as-a-community-tool/#comment-233901</guid>
		<description>It&#039;s possible that groups are SO obviously a good idea, they simply held them back from the initial release, so they could drop them in &quot;by popular demand&quot; down the line...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#8217;s possible that groups are SO obviously a good idea, they simply held them back from the initial release, so they could drop them in &#8220;by popular demand&#8221; down the line&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jim Long</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisbrogan.com/twitter-as-a-community-tool/comment-page-1/#comment-13431</link>
		<dc:creator>Jim Long</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 11 Mar 2007 18:20:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://grasshopperfactory.com/cbc/twitter-as-a-community-tool/#comment-13431</guid>
		<description>Twitter groups seems like a drop-dead simple idea.  Which crossed my mind too.  I&#039;m sure it occured to the people who designed it and I&#039;m surprised that it wasn&#039;t part of the original package.  Twitter is cool, no doubt about it,  as is your easy to digest breakdown of it&#039;s usefulness on Lifehack.

I wonder if some people are starting to over-think what it is.  I got a kick out of Stowe Boyd&#039;s &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.stoweboyd.com/message/2007/03/ross_mayfield_o.html&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;post on Twitter&lt;/a&gt;.  Some interesting observations sure, but good greif, just make it useful for yourself.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Twitter groups seems like a drop-dead simple idea.  Which crossed my mind too.  I&#8217;m sure it occured to the people who designed it and I&#8217;m surprised that it wasn&#8217;t part of the original package.  Twitter is cool, no doubt about it,  as is your easy to digest breakdown of it&#8217;s usefulness on Lifehack.</p>
<p>I wonder if some people are starting to over-think what it is.  I got a kick out of Stowe Boyd&#8217;s <a href="http://www.stoweboyd.com/message/2007/03/ross_mayfield_o.html" rel="nofollow">post on Twitter</a>.  Some interesting observations sure, but good greif, just make it useful for yourself.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jim Long</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisbrogan.com/twitter-as-a-community-tool/comment-page-1/#comment-233900</link>
		<dc:creator>Jim Long</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 11 Mar 2007 18:20:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://grasshopperfactory.com/cbc/twitter-as-a-community-tool/#comment-233900</guid>
		<description>Twitter groups seems like a drop-dead simple idea.  Which crossed my mind too.  I&#039;m sure it occured to the people who designed it and I&#039;m surprised that it wasn&#039;t part of the original package.  Twitter is cool, no doubt about it,  as is your easy to digest breakdown of it&#039;s usefulness on Lifehack.

I wonder if some people are starting to over-think what it is.  I got a kick out of Stowe Boyd&#039;s &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.stoweboyd.com/message/2007/03/ross_mayfield_o.html&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;post on Twitter&lt;/a&gt;.  Some interesting observations sure, but good greif, just make it useful for yourself.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Twitter groups seems like a drop-dead simple idea.  Which crossed my mind too.  I&#8217;m sure it occured to the people who designed it and I&#8217;m surprised that it wasn&#8217;t part of the original package.  Twitter is cool, no doubt about it,  as is your easy to digest breakdown of it&#8217;s usefulness on Lifehack.</p>
<p>I wonder if some people are starting to over-think what it is.  I got a kick out of Stowe Boyd&#8217;s <a href="http://www.stoweboyd.com/message/2007/03/ross_mayfield_o.html" rel="nofollow">post on Twitter</a>.  Some interesting observations sure, but good greif, just make it useful for yourself.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

