chrisbrogan.com

Covering social media business strategy and personal power

  • Home
  • About
  • Speaking
  • Rockstars
  • Subscribe
  • Newsletters
5

What BrightKite Does Well

April 21, 2008

brightkite BrightKite allows for a granularity of “friend” adding that I appreciate. I can add someone. I can add them as a TRUSTED friend, which means they get even more private info. And then from there, I can send their updates to a stream, to my phone via SMS, or to my email account. As social networks pile upon social networks, it’s time for you to start paying attention to the features that we’ll really need. Here’s a need:

I need for networks to start realizing a delicate social situation. It’s important that I accept people who know me from my blog and twitter as “friends” on a network, while still keeping them in the “small f” category of my life (until they grow into being more). Facebook doesn’t allow this. Hell, with Friend Suggest, it’s almost the opposite lately. I’m adding six-twelve new people a week that I don’t know, but presume I know from my blog or twitter or my friends.

What else do we need? We need a persona/profile that displays different values depending on the network. A service like ZLoop has an interesting service. They allow one to make several personas from one account, such that you can be a business version of yourself, a church version of yourself, and a friends version of yourself, or whatever versions you need to support.

What do YOU need in a social network platform these days? What tools do you need for the way you WANT to do work on these networks? You can start asking, you know. They need to start differentiating soon. It might as well be with your recommendations.

Screen caps made with Skitch

Uncategorized
socialnetworks, SocialSoftware, software

If you enjoyed this post, please consider leaving a comment or subscribing to the feed to receive future articles delivered to your feed reader.

Comments
Comment by Ricardo Bueno on April 21, 2008 @ 3:59 pm

My all-time favorite has been LinkedIn because it’s clean & to-the-point. Little spam and it’s a great way to stay in touch professionally with that group of people that you want to maintain contact with. But…as networks expand I definitely agree that it becomes important to differentiate one group of contacts from the next (who you’ve met and where & the extent of your relationship). It sounds silly, but these things are important!

Though FB is nice because you can interact informally, it’s difficult to keep up with everyone! Sure you can mass mail everyone an update or a greeting, but where’s the personal interaction in that?

I hesitate to try other social applications like Naymz but hey, if this will get your organized, why not give it a shot?

Comment by Ben Kunz on April 22, 2008 @ 10:50 pm

Chris, right on. Today we have what seems like a million different social media tools, yet each treats all of my contacts as the SAME pool of friends. You, my mom, my blog readers, my boss, my wife, my clients, my college friends are all on one mass level.

What I really want is fewer social media tools, and for each to allow me to segment friends. Sure, I’d like a handful of tools with discrete functionality, say text (Twitter), email, funk (Facebook), publishing (Blogger), and distribution (Digg). But there is no way that you should be in the same mass pool with my high school buddy … at least, not yet man.

The deep irony is that with all this social media innovation, we are still treating everybody the same. Feels a bit like mass media.

Comment by pieter on April 27, 2008 @ 2:16 pm

I’ve been thinking a lot about how normal social interactions might be defined with regard to information sharing between people. Off course how social networks handle this is of great interest to me.

Relationship types (and the mutual sharing of profile data) seems like a recurring theme in social network applications. Differentiation and ‘definition’ of the relationships you have is a basic social phenomenon. However, in my opinion most social web applications (even the ones allowing you to create different groups) have treated the concept of ‘friends’ exactly the wrong way around.

Most sites allow you to designate a relation (usually just ‘friend’, ‘co-worker’, ‘family’ etc) and based on that those people get to see more or less of your profile. This is exactly the opposite of what happens in our daily lives.

In real life, you start out with an initial level of disclosure towards some person, usually just your name and profession maybe. After that, the relationship might grow, and more (two way) disclosure follows. If all goes wel and neither of you causes a trust problem, then at some point you have a friend relationship. With other people such as colleagues, the (again two way) sharing of information doesn’t move beyond a certain point (i.e. no details about private personal things are shared).

So, to sum up; it’s not the relation ‘tag’ that determines what you share, but it’s what you share that determines the relation you have.

For social applications it follows that there is actually no need to explicitly name relationship types (friend, co-worker etc), but granular profile sharing should be implemented. Off course grouping your contacts every which way you want is still very useful, but it’s not strictly based on relationship types. (I could decide to group my contacts on an entirely different basis). Moreover, when grouping is based on predefined relationship types, a person can be only in one group at the time. Not likely in real life either.

Comment by Clarence Wooten on April 28, 2008 @ 1:31 am

Chris,

What about a concept of not having friends at all… but defining trust based on groups… and having dual profile personas (social & professional) that you display depending on the nature of the group that you’re communicating, sharing and networking with?

Yes.. this is a plug.. I’ve just described what CollectiveX does. I felt the need to mention it based on this post. Social networks are very friend-centric… and not very group-centric. CollectiveX-powered Groupsites are 100% group-centric, so defining levels of friendship isn’t necessary. The group defines the context and you decided how much of yourself you want to share based on that context and your level of trust in the group.

Try it and let me know what you think. So far it seems to be working… over 14,000 groups of all types and sizes have setup Groupsites powered by the CollectiveX platform. Not a single friend has been defined ;-)

Pingback by Brightkite Wants to Win the Mobile Social Network Battle + Invites for Readers - BuzzYA! on April 28, 2008 @ 7:19 pm

[…] pictures to my blog. Hopefully soon, I will be able to replace it with BrightKite." Twitterer igorschwarzmann likes their privacy features, CDReed is "all for encouraging real world interaction," and […]

Leave a comment

(required)

(required)


FriendFeed had this many likes and comments: hide
View this post on FriendFeed
  • December 31, 1969 at 4:33 pm John Federico
    Got any BrightKite invites, Chris? ...via AlertThingy

Add a comment on FriendFeed




Logged in as [logout]

Want to get the blog in your inbox? Enter your email (I value your privacy):

Delivered by FeedBurner

  • About Chris
    Chris Brogan advises businesses, organizations and individuals on how to use social media and social networks to build relationships and deliver value.

    I work with:

    CrossTechMedialogo

  • Recent Posts
    • Would Blockbuster Movies Benefit From Social Media
    • Essential Skills of a Community Manager
    • The Vital Importance of Your Network
    • Support Teams
    • Spectrums of Social Media for Marketing
  • FREE eBook
    free ebook
    Trust Economies (w/Julien Smith)

  • Blog Archives
    • July 2008
    • June 2008
    • May 2008
    • April 2008
    • March 2008
    • February 2008
    • January 2008
    • December 2007
    • November 2007
    • October 2007
    • September 2007
    • August 2007
    • July 2007
    • June 2007
    • May 2007
    • April 2007
    • March 2007
    • February 2007
    • January 2007
    • December 2006
    • November 2006
    • October 2006
    • September 2006
    • August 2006
    • July 2006
    • June 2006
    • May 2006
    • April 2006
    • March 2006
    • February 2006
    • January 2006
    • December 2005
    • October 2005
    • September 2005
    • August 2005
    • July 2005
    • June 2005
    • May 2005
    • April 2005
    • March 2005
    • February 2005
    • January 2005
    • December 2004
    • November 2004
    • October 2004
    • September 2004
    • August 2004
    • July 2004
    • June 2004
    • May 2004
    • April 2004
    • March 2004
  • Contact Chris
    • blog at chrisbrogan.com
    • 978-885-1551
    • AIM: cbrogandotcom
  • Find me on LinkedIn
  • Search
  • Tag Cloud
    advertising Announcement Article b2b birthday blogging blogs books branding business chrisbrogan communication community conference conferences customerservice event events facebook howto linkedin marketing media podcamp podcasting pr Promotion rss sales self-improvement selfimprovement socialmedia socialmedia100 socialnetworking socialnetworks SocialSoftware software Strategy technology twitter Uncategorized video videoblog writing youtube
  •  
  • Lijit Search
  • Upcoming.org Events
    More of chrisbrogan's events
  • freshbookslogo

Powered by Wordpress | Based on WP Premium theme by WP Remix. Customized by SnowyDay Design.
All contents Creative Commons licensed. chrisbrogan.com. Click here for rights info.