<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Why Ive Bought Personality Not Included 3 Times So Far</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.chrisbrogan.com/why-ive-bought-personality-not-included-3-times-so-far/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.chrisbrogan.com/why-ive-bought-personality-not-included-3-times-so-far/</link>
	<description>Learn How Human Business Works - Beyond Social Media</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 14:24:09 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Wesley</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisbrogan.com/why-ive-bought-personality-not-included-3-times-so-far/comment-page-1/#comment-142726</link>
		<dc:creator>Wesley</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 25 Oct 2008 22:34:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisbrogan.com/?p=2879#comment-142726</guid>
		<description>&quot;You have to be kidding me?&quot;

Why is that? And why did you put a question mark after that sentence?  Heh, just kidding. :)

&quot;Why would you care if Chris makes a few cents off selling a book he genuinely likes?&quot;

I don&#039;t mind that at all. I&#039;ve even said in the comments on other posts of his that I have no problem with the Google ads in his RSS feed or the ads on the right of the page, because it is clear that they are ads. Deception is what I don&#039;t like.

&quot;He would (I imagine given the rave he wrote) write a post about it even if he didn’t make money.&quot;

That&#039;s not the issue. I&#039;m sure Chris really does like the book. But he tagged the post a review. It&#039;s not a review. It&#039;s an ad. A review should highlight both the positive and negative aspects of a product, not just say, &quot;this is great great great.&quot; I doubt his rave would have been quite so... positive... were he not making money each time someone purchased. This would all be irrelevant, however, if he were more up front about what he is doing.

&quot;It’s simple and smart to use Amazon links not for the money (because it isn’t much) but to see what your audience likes and buys, or doesn’t.&quot;

That&#039;s fine, but just be honest about doing it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;You have to be kidding me?&#8221;</p>
<p>Why is that? And why did you put a question mark after that sentence?  Heh, just kidding. :)</p>
<p>&#8220;Why would you care if Chris makes a few cents off selling a book he genuinely likes?&#8221;</p>
<p>I don&#8217;t mind that at all. I&#8217;ve even said in the comments on other posts of his that I have no problem with the Google ads in his RSS feed or the ads on the right of the page, because it is clear that they are ads. Deception is what I don&#8217;t like.</p>
<p>&#8220;He would (I imagine given the rave he wrote) write a post about it even if he didn’t make money.&#8221;</p>
<p>That&#8217;s not the issue. I&#8217;m sure Chris really does like the book. But he tagged the post a review. It&#8217;s not a review. It&#8217;s an ad. A review should highlight both the positive and negative aspects of a product, not just say, &#8220;this is great great great.&#8221; I doubt his rave would have been quite so&#8230; positive&#8230; were he not making money each time someone purchased. This would all be irrelevant, however, if he were more up front about what he is doing.</p>
<p>&#8220;It’s simple and smart to use Amazon links not for the money (because it isn’t much) but to see what your audience likes and buys, or doesn’t.&#8221;</p>
<p>That&#8217;s fine, but just be honest about doing it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Wesley</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisbrogan.com/why-ive-bought-personality-not-included-3-times-so-far/comment-page-1/#comment-254800</link>
		<dc:creator>Wesley</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 25 Oct 2008 22:34:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisbrogan.com/?p=2879#comment-254800</guid>
		<description>&quot;You have to be kidding me?&quot;

Why is that? And why did you put a question mark after that sentence?  Heh, just kidding. :)

&quot;Why would you care if Chris makes a few cents off selling a book he genuinely likes?&quot;

I don&#039;t mind that at all. I&#039;ve even said in the comments on other posts of his that I have no problem with the Google ads in his RSS feed or the ads on the right of the page, because it is clear that they are ads. Deception is what I don&#039;t like.

&quot;He would (I imagine given the rave he wrote) write a post about it even if he didn’t make money.&quot;

That&#039;s not the issue. I&#039;m sure Chris really does like the book. But he tagged the post a review. It&#039;s not a review. It&#039;s an ad. A review should highlight both the positive and negative aspects of a product, not just say, &quot;this is great great great.&quot; I doubt his rave would have been quite so... positive... were he not making money each time someone purchased. This would all be irrelevant, however, if he were more up front about what he is doing.

&quot;It’s simple and smart to use Amazon links not for the money (because it isn’t much) but to see what your audience likes and buys, or doesn’t.&quot;

That&#039;s fine, but just be honest about doing it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;You have to be kidding me?&#8221;</p>
<p>Why is that? And why did you put a question mark after that sentence?  Heh, just kidding. :)</p>
<p>&#8220;Why would you care if Chris makes a few cents off selling a book he genuinely likes?&#8221;</p>
<p>I don&#8217;t mind that at all. I&#8217;ve even said in the comments on other posts of his that I have no problem with the Google ads in his RSS feed or the ads on the right of the page, because it is clear that they are ads. Deception is what I don&#8217;t like.</p>
<p>&#8220;He would (I imagine given the rave he wrote) write a post about it even if he didn’t make money.&#8221;</p>
<p>That&#8217;s not the issue. I&#8217;m sure Chris really does like the book. But he tagged the post a review. It&#8217;s not a review. It&#8217;s an ad. A review should highlight both the positive and negative aspects of a product, not just say, &#8220;this is great great great.&#8221; I doubt his rave would have been quite so&#8230; positive&#8230; were he not making money each time someone purchased. This would all be irrelevant, however, if he were more up front about what he is doing.</p>
<p>&#8220;It’s simple and smart to use Amazon links not for the money (because it isn’t much) but to see what your audience likes and buys, or doesn’t.&#8221;</p>
<p>That&#8217;s fine, but just be honest about doing it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jennifer Louden</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisbrogan.com/why-ive-bought-personality-not-included-3-times-so-far/comment-page-1/#comment-142709</link>
		<dc:creator>Jennifer Louden</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 25 Oct 2008 18:40:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisbrogan.com/?p=2879#comment-142709</guid>
		<description>You have to be kidding me? Why would you care if Chris makes a few cents off selling a book he genuinely likes? He would (I imagine given the rave he wrote) write a post about it even if he didn&#039;t make money. It&#039;s simple and smart to use Amazon links not for the money (because it isn&#039;t much) but to see what your audience likes and buys, or doesn&#039;t.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You have to be kidding me? Why would you care if Chris makes a few cents off selling a book he genuinely likes? He would (I imagine given the rave he wrote) write a post about it even if he didn&#8217;t make money. It&#8217;s simple and smart to use Amazon links not for the money (because it isn&#8217;t much) but to see what your audience likes and buys, or doesn&#8217;t.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jennifer Louden</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisbrogan.com/why-ive-bought-personality-not-included-3-times-so-far/comment-page-1/#comment-254799</link>
		<dc:creator>Jennifer Louden</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 25 Oct 2008 18:40:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisbrogan.com/?p=2879#comment-254799</guid>
		<description>You have to be kidding me? Why would you care if Chris makes a few cents off selling a book he genuinely likes? He would (I imagine given the rave he wrote) write a post about it even if he didn&#039;t make money. It&#039;s simple and smart to use Amazon links not for the money (because it isn&#039;t much) but to see what your audience likes and buys, or doesn&#039;t.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You have to be kidding me? Why would you care if Chris makes a few cents off selling a book he genuinely likes? He would (I imagine given the rave he wrote) write a post about it even if he didn&#8217;t make money. It&#8217;s simple and smart to use Amazon links not for the money (because it isn&#8217;t much) but to see what your audience likes and buys, or doesn&#8217;t.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Wesley</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisbrogan.com/why-ive-bought-personality-not-included-3-times-so-far/comment-page-1/#comment-142649</link>
		<dc:creator>Wesley</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 25 Oct 2008 09:22:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisbrogan.com/?p=2879#comment-142649</guid>
		<description>I really didn&#039;t mean to start a huge argument with this. I should probably just leave it be... on the other hand...

&quot;I believe Chris properly disclosed the status of the affiliated nature of the links.&quot;

So does this mean you didn&#039;t read the post? Because he didn&#039;t disclose that at all.

&quot;For one, it’s widely known Amazon has an affiliate program; second, anyone can mouseover his links and discover the affiliate.&quot;

If you know what affiliate links look like. Many people would not even think to do that and if they did would just see a long URL.

&quot;Basically, Chris isn’t masking, burying or doing _anything_ deceptive with the links. More power to him that he shares WHY he loves the book.&quot;

But he didn&#039;t share the real reason he loves the book... that it makes him money! Heh, just kidding, I&#039;m sure he really does like the book, but come on. Tagging it as a review? It&#039;s an ad! I just think it should be labeled as such.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I really didn&#8217;t mean to start a huge argument with this. I should probably just leave it be&#8230; on the other hand&#8230;</p>
<p>&#8220;I believe Chris properly disclosed the status of the affiliated nature of the links.&#8221;</p>
<p>So does this mean you didn&#8217;t read the post? Because he didn&#8217;t disclose that at all.</p>
<p>&#8220;For one, it’s widely known Amazon has an affiliate program; second, anyone can mouseover his links and discover the affiliate.&#8221;</p>
<p>If you know what affiliate links look like. Many people would not even think to do that and if they did would just see a long URL.</p>
<p>&#8220;Basically, Chris isn’t masking, burying or doing _anything_ deceptive with the links. More power to him that he shares WHY he loves the book.&#8221;</p>
<p>But he didn&#8217;t share the real reason he loves the book&#8230; that it makes him money! Heh, just kidding, I&#8217;m sure he really does like the book, but come on. Tagging it as a review? It&#8217;s an ad! I just think it should be labeled as such.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Wesley</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisbrogan.com/why-ive-bought-personality-not-included-3-times-so-far/comment-page-1/#comment-254798</link>
		<dc:creator>Wesley</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 25 Oct 2008 09:22:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisbrogan.com/?p=2879#comment-254798</guid>
		<description>I really didn&#039;t mean to start a huge argument with this. I should probably just leave it be... on the other hand...

&quot;I believe Chris properly disclosed the status of the affiliated nature of the links.&quot;

So does this mean you didn&#039;t read the post? Because he didn&#039;t disclose that at all.

&quot;For one, it’s widely known Amazon has an affiliate program; second, anyone can mouseover his links and discover the affiliate.&quot;

If you know what affiliate links look like. Many people would not even think to do that and if they did would just see a long URL.

&quot;Basically, Chris isn’t masking, burying or doing _anything_ deceptive with the links. More power to him that he shares WHY he loves the book.&quot;

But he didn&#039;t share the real reason he loves the book... that it makes him money! Heh, just kidding, I&#039;m sure he really does like the book, but come on. Tagging it as a review? It&#039;s an ad! I just think it should be labeled as such.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I really didn&#8217;t mean to start a huge argument with this. I should probably just leave it be&#8230; on the other hand&#8230;</p>
<p>&#8220;I believe Chris properly disclosed the status of the affiliated nature of the links.&#8221;</p>
<p>So does this mean you didn&#8217;t read the post? Because he didn&#8217;t disclose that at all.</p>
<p>&#8220;For one, it’s widely known Amazon has an affiliate program; second, anyone can mouseover his links and discover the affiliate.&#8221;</p>
<p>If you know what affiliate links look like. Many people would not even think to do that and if they did would just see a long URL.</p>
<p>&#8220;Basically, Chris isn’t masking, burying or doing _anything_ deceptive with the links. More power to him that he shares WHY he loves the book.&#8221;</p>
<p>But he didn&#8217;t share the real reason he loves the book&#8230; that it makes him money! Heh, just kidding, I&#8217;m sure he really does like the book, but come on. Tagging it as a review? It&#8217;s an ad! I just think it should be labeled as such.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Joe</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisbrogan.com/why-ive-bought-personality-not-included-3-times-so-far/comment-page-1/#comment-142644</link>
		<dc:creator>Joe</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 25 Oct 2008 08:31:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisbrogan.com/?p=2879#comment-142644</guid>
		<description>@Wesley -- I believe Chris properly disclosed the status of the affiliated nature of the links. For one, it&#039;s widely known Amazon has an affiliate program; second, anyone can mouseover his links and discover the affiliate. 

Basically, Chris isn&#039;t masking, burying or doing _anything_ deceptive with the links. More power to him that he shares WHY he loves the book. 

--Joe</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Wesley &#8212; I believe Chris properly disclosed the status of the affiliated nature of the links. For one, it&#8217;s widely known Amazon has an affiliate program; second, anyone can mouseover his links and discover the affiliate. </p>
<p>Basically, Chris isn&#8217;t masking, burying or doing _anything_ deceptive with the links. More power to him that he shares WHY he loves the book. </p>
<p>&#8211;Joe</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Joe</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisbrogan.com/why-ive-bought-personality-not-included-3-times-so-far/comment-page-1/#comment-254797</link>
		<dc:creator>Joe</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 25 Oct 2008 08:31:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisbrogan.com/?p=2879#comment-254797</guid>
		<description>@Wesley -- I believe Chris properly disclosed the status of the affiliated nature of the links. For one, it&#039;s widely known Amazon has an affiliate program; second, anyone can mouseover his links and discover the affiliate. 

Basically, Chris isn&#039;t masking, burying or doing _anything_ deceptive with the links. More power to him that he shares WHY he loves the book. 

--Joe</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Wesley &#8212; I believe Chris properly disclosed the status of the affiliated nature of the links. For one, it&#8217;s widely known Amazon has an affiliate program; second, anyone can mouseover his links and discover the affiliate. </p>
<p>Basically, Chris isn&#8217;t masking, burying or doing _anything_ deceptive with the links. More power to him that he shares WHY he loves the book. </p>
<p>&#8211;Joe</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Wesley</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisbrogan.com/why-ive-bought-personality-not-included-3-times-so-far/comment-page-1/#comment-142643</link>
		<dc:creator>Wesley</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 25 Oct 2008 08:26:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisbrogan.com/?p=2879#comment-142643</guid>
		<description>How are they obvious? I had to roll over them to see if they were. If not for that I could have read the entire post and had no idea. And even on the off chance that your reader has read your entire 700 word about page with the &quot;disclaimer&quot; at the very bottom, it seems like it&#039;s referring to the ads on the sidebar. It says nothing about sneaking advertising into your posts and there is definitely nothing making it clear that this particular post contains affiliate links. 

I&#039;m not saying you don&#039;t have the right to dedicate entire posts to advertising your affiliate links, but I am saying that you should be more upfront about it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>How are they obvious? I had to roll over them to see if they were. If not for that I could have read the entire post and had no idea. And even on the off chance that your reader has read your entire 700 word about page with the &#8220;disclaimer&#8221; at the very bottom, it seems like it&#8217;s referring to the ads on the sidebar. It says nothing about sneaking advertising into your posts and there is definitely nothing making it clear that this particular post contains affiliate links. </p>
<p>I&#8217;m not saying you don&#8217;t have the right to dedicate entire posts to advertising your affiliate links, but I am saying that you should be more upfront about it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Wesley</title>
		<link>http://www.chrisbrogan.com/why-ive-bought-personality-not-included-3-times-so-far/comment-page-1/#comment-254796</link>
		<dc:creator>Wesley</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 25 Oct 2008 08:26:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisbrogan.com/?p=2879#comment-254796</guid>
		<description>How are they obvious? I had to roll over them to see if they were. If not for that I could have read the entire post and had no idea. And even on the off chance that your reader has read your entire 700 word about page with the &quot;disclaimer&quot; at the very bottom, it seems like it&#039;s referring to the ads on the sidebar. It says nothing about sneaking advertising into your posts and there is definitely nothing making it clear that this particular post contains affiliate links. 

I&#039;m not saying you don&#039;t have the right to dedicate entire posts to advertising your affiliate links, but I am saying that you should be more upfront about it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>How are they obvious? I had to roll over them to see if they were. If not for that I could have read the entire post and had no idea. And even on the off chance that your reader has read your entire 700 word about page with the &#8220;disclaimer&#8221; at the very bottom, it seems like it&#8217;s referring to the ads on the sidebar. It says nothing about sneaking advertising into your posts and there is definitely nothing making it clear that this particular post contains affiliate links. </p>
<p>I&#8217;m not saying you don&#8217;t have the right to dedicate entire posts to advertising your affiliate links, but I am saying that you should be more upfront about it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

