It’s Not Who You Circle; It’s Who Circles You

Circle of Journalists In Google+, one of the main activities we perform is finding people of interest to follow. In this graphic to the left, I started following journalists and news professionals based on a great list that I found at Muck Rack (hat tip +Steve Garfield). This will prove to be great, because I’ll get to learn what they’re doing with Google+, figure out what has their attention, and also, it never hurts to know some reporters and journalists.

But It’s Not Who You Circle

The fact that I’m circling up all these journalists in Google+ doesn’t matter. They may or may not get a notification of the connection (I don’t – I shut off all notifications). They may or may not look and think, Huh. No idea why he’s following me and I don’t know him, so no need to circle him back. Or they might know me, but decide that it’s not who they’ve chosen to circle (maybe they’re only following Silicon Valley tech CEOs, for instance.

I know this, though, even though I point content towards that circle, by sending out posts to ONLY that circle, they’ll go unseen until they circle me back. That’s how Google+ works. It’s not reciprocal. It’s not two way. People won’t see your stuff just because you mention them in it. (There’s no real @mentions like in Twitter that are robust enough just yet. I only see 3 or 4 mentions at any given time in the “notifications” tab on Google+.)

So, what has to happen next is that I have to ‘get on their radar,’ if I hope to be circled by them.

How to Encourage Being Circled

Now, let’s be clear: different people want different things, so there’s no blanket way to convince someone that they should add you to their circles. For instance, just because you and I are both interested in marketing, I’m not as likely to add you to a circle, because I’m already reading hundreds and hundreds of sources of marketing information. I do, however, love comics, and would circle many people involved in the creation of comic books and other related information. Why? Because it’s a personal interest. So, let’s agree that this advice is only a starting point, and that it’s still up to the person whether they choose to circle you or not.

Some Ways to Get Circled By People You Follow

  • Comment with meaningful and useful information or ideas. Someone shared a link to a related video to one that I had posted, and I found it useful, so I circled them back.
  • Share and add commentary to posts of that person, explaining why you find it interesting. Everyone loves a little boost of promotion.
  • Comment with relevant links to your own work, if it makes sense.
  • Have a well filled-out profile. The better your profile, the more likely someone is to want to connect with you.
  • Post interesting things worth seeing, should this person decide to look at what you’ve shared publicly.

Beyond that, that’s all you can do to hope to get some connectivity with those who you’ve chosen to circle.

Reciprocity Isn’t a Requirement. In Fact, it Can Be Bad

In Twitter, the biggest problem many people created for themselves was they did reciprocal following. I wrote about this here. But that’s tricky, because no one ever wants to feel like they’re not worthy of your time, and by not circling someone back, that’s what it (can) feel like you’re saying.

The problem with this is that to follow everyone back in Google+ recreates the same mess: the Stream (of information being read) is suddenly useless because it’s built on courtesy and not elements of interest, and because Google+ has a kind of “one circle or ALL circles” gate right now, it’s not easy enough to say, “Just put people in a circle.” Furthermore, that would just lead to the “follow you but don’t really read you” problem that exists already in places like Twitter and/or Facebook, for that matter.

So, Engagement Is The Thing

Near as I can tell, the secret of having reciprocal circles comes from those five points above. But I may be wrong. What do you think?

Related posts:

  1. The Circle Story
  2. Reciprocal Behavior in Social Networks
  3. Conversations Matter in Google+
  4. Google Plus is a VERY Different Sharing Environment
  5. Getting Started With Google Plus

ChrisBrogan.com runs on the Genesis Framework

Genesis Theme Framework

The Genesis Framework empowers you to quickly and easily build incredible websites with WordPress. Whether you're a novice or advanced developer, Genesis provides you with the secure and search-engine-optimized foundation that takes WordPress to places you never thought it could go.

With automatic theme updates and world-class support included, Genesis is the smart choice for your WordPress website or blog.

Become a StudioPress Affiliate

  • Taraclark

    Hi Chris,

    Great article, very informative. What are your thoughts on Google+ for business? Do you think that companies are better off using Google+ as a personal account to engage with customers and prospects or do you think that a Google+ business account would be a better way to connect with a particular community? Will Google+ for business be a good marketing tool? In what way?

    Thanks!

    @taraclark86

  • http://www.kristofcreative.com Kristof

    i think a big appeal of Google+ is that people have learned from the mistakes they made on Twitter — like auto following everyone who follows you. And now that their stream is so overloaded with noise, it’s almost impossible to go back and undo the mess. In fact, some people have actually started new Twitter accounts just so they can be more particular about who they follow and the content entering their stream. And with Google+, now people can do just that. I also really LOVE that I can’t see posts from people unless I circle them – a great way to keep spammers at bay.

  • Pingback: Twitted by KakieF

  • LeeNukes

    Isn’t the Incoming screen for posts from people who have you in their circles?

    I also thought the extended circles option was to post to your circles and everyone who has you in their circles.

    • http://bit.ly/RandyJMitchell Randy J. Mitchell

      LeeNukes: 

      The answer to your question about the “Incoming” Stream is yes. When someone who is NOT in one of your “Circles” attempts to share something with you. Their profile pic appears at the Top of your stream as a type of alert to let you know that the above is taking place.At this point you have the option of viewing their post via “Incoming” or ignoring it. If you choose to view it and its someone you don’t know but whom you find interesting you can add them to one of your circles at that point; i.e. “Following”. Or it could be as it was in my instance a friend who you forgot to add or who recently created a G+ Profile and is trying to connect.Extended Circles post to everyone in your “Circles” who also has you in their “Circles” as well as to everyone in the Circles of your reciprocating Circles; gotta be an easier way to explain that…sheeessh! :-)Hope that makes sense.Cheers!

  • http://twitter.com/AJ_Gruss J. Alexandre Gruss

    Very well written and super-useful. Thanks Chris

  • Pingback: Top 50 Social Media Blog Content For June and July 2011 | Garious Blog

  • Keith Patterson

    Your Google+ posts are displayed to the people who you have circled in their Incoming stream. Of course you can’t expect anyone with a life to be reading Incoming regularly, but perhaps Google has plans to use this later – alerts on keywords, for example

  • http://pulse.yahoo.com/_HSC25V7KQG4UJ5Q3KQQGTIAMTM Rose Lu

    I haven’t been on Google+ very long, but I am starting to think it’s for the “cool kids” !

  • Pingback: 26 Ressources Indispensables Pour Comprendre Et Utiliser Google Plus | Emarketinglicious.fr

  • Julia Rymut

    I’ve been coaching a client who is just starting with FB and Twitter.  He’s very old school, very offline in how he understands social interactions.  I’ve had to describe the social rules in these networks and it has me thinking.

    I think part of the problem is that all these social networks are creating new social rules that aren’t yet written.  Is it rude to not circle back?  FB has the problem that if someone “Friends” you and you don’t reciprocate, it sounds rude.  But “Fans” seem so egotistical.  Twitter had an unwritten rule that you should follow everyone who follows you.  But that’s like going to every event listed in the Events section of the newspaper.  Circles are nice, but you can start to feel like the kids who joins a party that no one invited you to.

    I agree that engagement is important, but what kind of engagement?  Is commenting “So true” a real connection?

    How are we weaving our social connections?

    There’s something real and authentic that is missing from most of this and I tend to think that the fault is in thinking that we can have 7000 close friends.  Myself, I’m working to have fewer, more meaningful circles.  If I can have real conversations with people, isn’t that better than surface interactions with the Google+ movie stars?

    • Keith Barron

      Most of my circles are for my own interests and people I actually know, I agree with what you say;

      ‘I’m working to have fewer, more meaningful circles.  If I can have real conversations with people, isn’t that better than surface interactions with the Google+ movie stars?’

  • Pingback: วิธีทำให้คน Circle คุณใน Google+ | Oddhome (อ๊อด)

  • Pingback: วิธีทำให้คน Circle คุณใน Google+ « it-cafe.in.th

  • Pingback: How to Get in Circles on Google Plus – Turning Friends and Followers into Real Relationships

  • http://laroquodexperiment.com/hypo/0.1/ Paul Laroquod

    From an earlier comment: “Twitter had an unwritten rule that you should follow everyone who follows you.”

    Actually, no. Only certain types on Twitter had that rule, particularly the marketing crowd. Almost nobody I actually follow has that rule; there are millions of ordinary people on Twitter who have never operated by this rule. The best way to find these people is to avoid marketing types all together. This is why anyone associated with ‘social media marketing’ has a bad name on Twitter now; because they were always the ones pushing the ‘everybody follow back’ culture for what were obviously selfish reasons, but don’t fool yourselves; nobody who *wasn’t* actually a social media marketer ever really believed that these promiscuous followbackers were ever listening to anyone. Because it was obvious and we weren’t stupid. So really social marketing types destroyed their own reputation on Twitter, with this exact ‘unwritten rule’, but it was by no means universal and most people using Twitter who do not read these types of articles (for example) do not and have never followed this rule: in fact they despise it and those who used it, to be honest.

    Things are not really any better on Google+, either. I see tons of people circling back thousands. I see people complaining unironically that they have hit to 5000-people circle limit and can’t circle anymore people back. I see people pretending that the circle system gives you a magical ability to pay attention to thousands, but it obviously doesn’t. What it does it make it easier to conceal than on Twitter the number of people you are circling and thus easier to pretend that you are listening to people when you aren’t. But make no mistake: people know exactly what you’re doing because the rest of us still aren’t stupid, and when you follow back 5000 people, you aren’t going to be able to spread yourself thin enough to be able to fool any of them into thinking they actually have your attention. Thus, there will be another backlash against over-socialisers who bite off more than they can chew on G+, just like there has been on Twitter.

    Attention is a finite resource: there is no software-based solution for this. Don’t let anyone convince you otherwise.

  • Pingback: Wednesday Five@5: Digital Marketing Daily | Frias Agency's Digital Marketing Blog

  • Pingback: Google Plus – A Tool to Transform Knowledge Sharing As We Know It? « KeySo Global Blog

  • Pingback: Google+ Resources, How-To’s, Tips and Tricks

  • Carol

    I’m really enjoying google+ I’ve created several circles identifying my new found friends. Such as Social Media – I have social media in common with these people in my circle. Healthy Living-people who teach or share their tips for living healthy. I have a news circle for keeping up with the news. A basic acquaintance circle for people i’m not sure which circle to put them in. Photography -for the really great photographers i’m meeting every day. The sky’s the limit. Customize your circles right from the beginning and save yourself time later. Chris thanks for sharing +Victoria Bracknell. Her healthy green drinks and daily walks inspire meet to take a break from the computer and get moving!

  • http://www.thebrandiD.com RachelGogos

    I think that the rules of engagement in the offline world often
    apply to the online world. Just because someone wants to be your
    “friend” or follower doesn’t mean that you would follow him or her
    back in the offline world so why would it online?  I never bought in to
    the reciprocal tweeting relationship nor the circle one.  ; )

  • http://www.thebrandiD.com RachelGogos

    I think that the rules of engagement in the offline world often
    apply to the online world. Just because someone wants to be your
    “friend” or follower doesn’t mean that you would follow him or her
    back in the offline world so why would it online?  I never bought in to
    the reciprocal tweeting relationship nor the circle one.  ; )